disapointed low 12 second run with 408
04-22-2006, 09:15 AM
#1
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
disapointed low 12 second run with 408 Dident have my skinnies on the front had my fat 17x9.5s and i think my 3.73s in the 12 bolt are hurting me pretty bad. im runing a m6 with a 26x10.5x16 et street. Im pretty shure i can get a 119mph and high 11second run how the car sits.....
60 1.704
330 5.071
1/8 7.799
mph 89.82
1000 10.156
1/4 12.108
mph 117.19
60 1.704
330 5.071
1/8 7.799
mph 89.82
1000 10.156
1/4 12.108
mph 117.19
04-22-2006, 10:48 AM
#3
Administrator
I would think your 408 should make around 500rwhp N/A which is good traps
in the 120's. I wouldn't bee too concerned about ET. That's just traction, suspension,
and driving issues. The lack of power is interesting.
in the 120's. I wouldn't bee too concerned about ET. That's just traction, suspension,
and driving issues. The lack of power is interesting.
Trending Topics
04-24-2006, 08:05 PM
#8
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea im gona order up a set of 4.10s and a spool....not shure to do qa1s firts in the front or the gera i wana get down in the 1.5 60 foot time but probly gona need both
04-30-2006, 05:47 PM
#9
Staging Lane
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre,PA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would def take the car to a different dyno, something doesnt add up. my car with mac mids/lid/free mods/stock weight went 12.6x @ 114 on a 2.0 60' . You have 490rwhp and only trapped 117?? as far as the 3.73's go their fine id get your motor checked out first
04-30-2006, 06:35 PM
#11
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BAD_Z28
i would def take the car to a different dyno, something doesnt add up. my car with mac mids/lid/free mods/stock weight went 12.6x @ 114 on a 2.0 60' . You have 490rwhp and only trapped 117?? as far as the 3.73's go their fine id get your motor checked out first
05-01-2006, 09:03 PM
#14
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sleeperstyle
so the clutch was slipping? or you couldn't shift fast?
good luck, post up the results.
good luck, post up the results.
05-03-2006, 05:53 PM
#16
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigbadblackws6
when are you running next to post new times? where in florida are you at?
steve
steve
