Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

too little crankshaft endplay?

Old 10-20-2010, 05:13 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default too little crankshaft endplay?

I'm doing all of the blueprinting on my shortblock this week, and today I got all of my main bearing gaps measured with plastigauge, and they all measure between .0015 and .002". I moved on to run-out on the crank and that was non-existant. I oiled all of the bearings, torqued to 15ftlbs, smacked the crank back and forward, then finished tightening the main caps. The problem is, I don't have any measurable endplay on the crank. I can reef back and forth on the crank with a screwdriver between a cap & a counter weight, but nothing moves. My smallest feeler gauge is .002" and I can't fit it between the crank and the thrust bearing. I set up a dial indicator on the end of the crank and I can't get it to move... but it's an old POS dial indicator, so I don't trust it. The crank spins freely & smoothly.

So... I seem to have little or no endplay on the crank. What do I do about it?

It's a compstar 4" crank and the bearings are clevite.
Old 10-20-2010, 05:40 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
HotSilverBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you didn't have any it wouldn't spin at all.
Old 10-20-2010, 07:18 PM
  #3  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Loosen the number 3 main cap and check for play with the cap loose. If it has play the cap was not centered.
You do have the Clevite MS2199H bearings I assume?

Kurt
Old 10-20-2010, 09:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
RARON455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You really need to be using a dial indicator, not feeler gauges, Mount it on the front of the block, then push forward and backward and watch the neede sweep to get the measurement.
Old 10-20-2010, 10:40 PM
  #5  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I have wet sanded many a thrust bearing on a piece of glass (or any very flat surface) to get the end-play figures I was looking for.

Its not uncommon for the LS engines to have little or no endplay.

Make sure what you have is correct by loosening the cap a little and trying to line them up again and if you don't have enough break out the wet/dry paper (320 works pretty good) and some WD 40 as a lubricant. It takes a little time...the material doesn't come off very quickly. I usually keep a 1 inch mic handy to measure how quickly the material is coming off. Just sneak up on it and recheck it in the engine a couple of time if necessary.

-Tony
Old 10-21-2010, 10:04 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This morning my father and I mounted a better dial indicator to the crank and reefed on the crank and measured .0015 to .00175" of endplay. I called Callies and they said that I need to have 5-7 thousands, so I'm still a long way off. The Callies guy looked up the specification for the Clevite 2199 bearing and said that it should measure 1.028", so I'm going to pull the crank back out and measure the bearing width while it's installed in the block. I'll also measure the width on the crank to see where I'm at.

Assuming that I need to sand the bearing a bit, how much can I sand before I need to be concerned about the top surface of the bearing becoming too thin? From the looks of things, I might need to take a couple thousands off each side of the bearing.
Old 10-21-2010, 10:28 AM
  #7  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jim85IROC
This morning my father and I mounted a better dial indicator to the crank and reefed on the crank and measured .0015 to .00175" of endplay. I called Callies and they said that I need to have 5-7 thousands, so I'm still a long way off. The Callies guy looked up the specification for the Clevite 2199 bearing and said that it should measure 1.028", so I'm going to pull the crank back out and measure the bearing width while it's installed in the block. I'll also measure the width on the crank to see where I'm at.

Assuming that I need to sand the bearing a bit, how much can I sand before I need to be concerned about the top surface of the bearing becoming too thin? From the looks of things, I might need to take a couple thousands off each side of the bearing.
Did you measure without the center cap?
Old 10-21-2010, 10:37 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No, I measured with everything in place. Isn't the center bearing what determines my endplay? How would I measure without it?
Old 10-21-2010, 10:45 AM
  #9  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Yes, the center thrust bearing is what determines endplay, but if you're having problems with it, you can measure without the center cap, or at least with it loose. You shouldn't be getting that little of clearance.

Like Kurt said, if you get a lot of clearance without the cap tighened and almost nothing when it is tightened, then the cap may not have set properly.
Old 10-21-2010, 12:43 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

GM service manual for the 4.8L,5.3L,6.0L engine calls for proper crankshaft endplay of (0.0015 - 0.0078 in ) , so looks like youre measurement are right on.
Old 10-21-2010, 02:45 PM
  #11  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 2500
GM service manual for the 4.8L,5.3L,6.0L engine calls for proper crankshaft endplay of (0.0015 - 0.0078 in ) , so looks like youre measurement are right on.
.002 is too tight for a performance build....

.004 - 005 is perfect IMO

OP, you can remove the material from one side of the bearing.....just make sure you hit the same side of the top and the lower shell (meaning either wet-sand both sides of the bearing on the reluctor side of the crank or both sides of the bearings on the dampner side of the crank.

Measure one side of each bearing shell with a 1" mic....knock a thou off them and reinstall it measuring endplay with the dial indicator once again. You should see a direct increase in end play associated with the reduction in thickness obviously. Taking your time and sneaking up on the clearance you need is usually best. If you have an honest .004 - .006 or so your done but I personally prefer to be in the middle or on the tighter side of that spec.

Note the crank will likely turn a little easier when your finished...

-Tony
Old 10-21-2010, 02:56 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
HotSilverBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think you are fine...let it be. It will wear in some too. 5-7 thous is WAY too much...I'd stay where you are.
Old 10-21-2010, 04:26 PM
  #13  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

What kind of damage do you see with the higher numbers?

Kurt
Originally Posted by HotSilverBird
I think you are fine...let it be. It will wear in some too. 5-7 thous is WAY too much...I'd stay where you are.
Old 10-21-2010, 04:47 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
HotSilverBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ever hear of the harmonic balancer bolt coming loose? The major cause is too loose end play on the crank. It really plays hell on everything. Lets the crank walk and shake itself to death.I would start out as tight as possible, ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with .002.
The following users liked this post:
LS CHEVY II (06-19-2023)
Old 10-21-2010, 04:57 PM
  #15  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I have never had that problem, but I have heard of them coming loose. What is the higher clearance doing that causes this? I have set them as high as .010 with no problems, but have seen trouble with high power engines below .003, although I have only built a few over the .005 mark.

Kurt
Originally Posted by HotSilverBird
ever hear of the harmonic balancer bolt coming loose? The major cause is too loose end play on the crank. It really plays hell on everything. Lets the crank walk and shake itself to death.I would start out as tight as possible, ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with .002.
Old 10-21-2010, 05:13 PM
  #16  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Tony,
Attached is how lazy people do it!!! I cut them in place with a mandrel I made that bolts into the mains on bearings. The other picture shows the force fed oiling I use on the turbo stuff, 8 holes feeding the thrust surface. This is used with .006-.008 endplay and has been working well!

Kurt
Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
.002 is too tight for a performance build....

.004 - 005 is perfect IMO

OP, you can remove the material from one side of the bearing.....just make sure you hit the same side of the top and the lower shell (meaning either wet-sand both sides of the bearing on the reluctor side of the crank or both sides of the bearings on the dampner side of the crank.

Measure one side of each bearing shell with a 1" mic....knock a thou off them and reinstall it measuring endplay with the dial indicator once again. You should see a direct increase in end play associated with the reduction in thickness obviously. Taking your time and sneaking up on the clearance you need is usually best. If you have an honest .004 - .006 or so your done but I personally prefer to be in the middle or on the tighter side of that spec.

Note the crank will likely turn a little easier when your finished...

-Tony
Attached Thumbnails too little crankshaft endplay?-dscf3595.jpg   too little crankshaft endplay?-dscf3596.jpg   too little crankshaft endplay?-dscf3598.jpg  
Old 10-21-2010, 06:25 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
HotSilverBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Has alot to do with how well the engine is balanced too. Poor balance and too much end play and its going to play hell on the bearings. My experience has always been keep it tight as possible. I had a high performance Porsche engine toss the flywheel 3 times because the IDIOT engine builder was on the top end of the crank clearance. Cost big bucks to fix it every time until i finally got smart and checked into it and found the IGIT was setting it as wide as possible. His explaination was loose was better and faster etc....BS After setting it to factory minimum setting i never tossed another flywheel and that was putting out over 300hp.

There is good reason that harmonic balancer is on the end of the crank, without it the bearing won't live very long. Same with the crank end play, that crank is moving all over the place and will beat itself to death quickly if it is too loose in end play. I can see a HIGH HP application using 4-5 thous but honestly any more than that is asking for trouble later on. Plus that thrust bearing is going to wear in some. You got 8 pistons pushing that crank all over the place, gotta have things tight if you want it to stay alive a long time.

Last edited by HotSilverBird; 10-21-2010 at 06:30 PM.
Old 10-21-2010, 07:44 PM
  #18  
10 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (25)
 
67SS509's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Whiteville, NC
Posts: 866
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have checked a few to see what affect wearin has. What started out as .003-.004 endplay became .007-.008 in less than a 1000 miles.
Old 10-21-2010, 07:56 PM
  #19  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427
Tony,
Attached is how lazy people do it!!! I cut them in place with a mandrel I made that bolts into the mains on bearings. The other picture shows the force fed oiling I use on the turbo stuff, 8 holes feeding the thrust surface. This is used with .006-.008 endplay and has been working well!

Kurt
Hey Kurt,

That's a pretty trick deal you have fabbed there but its hard to shake a stick at a simple and effective solution that anyone can handle in their garage or shop (with the obvious implications it makes more sense for most people reading this....LOL).

I have used the "wetsanding and mic" method for twenty five years without issue....you just need to take your time.

See you at PRI hopefully!

Cheers,
Tony

Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; 10-21-2010 at 08:22 PM.
Old 10-21-2010, 08:00 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
HotSilverBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 67SS509
I have checked a few to see what affect wearin has. What started out as .003-.004 endplay became .007-.008 in less than a 1000 miles.
There you go, its going to wear to a certain place no matter what you do. The crank moves around alot more than you think. It takes a hell of alot of abuse.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: too little crankshaft endplay?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.