LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

LS1/LS2/LS6 intake swap Sticky!!!

Old 03-01-2011, 09:13 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS1/LS2/LS6 intake swap Sticky!!!

First things first...
There has been a lot of questions about what intake manifold to use.. LS1 or LS6. F.A.S.T will not work due to the rear bulge. Sorry....

Here is a test performed by TPiS. READ AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF! http://www.tpis.com/pages/2_17_06

LS1 intake vs. LS6 intake flow numbers.
.........................................200"..300 "..350"..400"..450"..500"..550"..600"

Stock LS6 head, LS1 intake....156...199...212...224...232...238...243. ..247
Stock LS6 head, LS6 intake....154...204...220...235...247...257...263. ..265

Stock cam with 1.8 rockers will provid about .510" non DOD and .520" DOD lobes lift. Valves will only reach peak lift numbers/flow once; and .050" lift twice. This is why the LS1 intake works after getting it's *** kicked above .450"

This is how I did my intake swap and the parts I used.
I will add links for the parts later

LS1/LS6 intake
LS6 injectors
1/4 NPT to 3/8" hose fitting
1/4 NPT to 1/2" hose fitting
1 31/32" freeze plug
EV1-EV6 injector adapters
EGR plug (LS1 intake only)
LS1/LS6 fuel rail (non-returnless rail)
Intake gaskets, TB gasket
TB adapter
3M yellow weather stripping adhessive

You can get fittings here http://www.fastfittings.com/product/32006
Injector adapters http://www.bmotorsports.com/shop/pro...oducts_id/1765
Map extension harness http://www.bmotorsports.com/shop/pro...roducts_id/784

Start off by cleaning the intake with Gunk and hot water.

Remove the factory PCV fitting from the intake. You will need to gain as much opsu clearance as possible.
I used a dremel cutoff wheel. When the PCV nipple is ground down flush, plug the hole with some epoxy PUTTY.
Name:  mod.jpg
Views: 16143
Size:  50.0 KB
Name:  2011-03-18130655.jpg
Views: 14108
Size:  60.3 KB

Next remove the rear vacuum fitting.
Name:  351th5y.jpg
Views: 14900
Size:  21.3 KB

Take a hacksaw, and saw the fitting off. Pry the rest of the fitting out with a flat blade screwdriver.
Name:  2011-03-30181400.jpg
Views: 13852
Size:  82.7 KB
Name:  2011-03-30181418.jpg
Views: 13819
Size:  35.4 KB

Here is what you'll end up with.
Name:  2011-03-30181336.jpg
Views: 13964
Size:  32.4 KB

Next, plug the hole with a 1 31/32" freeze plug using 3M weatherstripping adhessive or epoxy. Then drill a 7/16" hole in the lower corner and mount the MAP sensor with a small screw. I used adhessive to seal the screw too.
Name:  2011-03-30185836.jpg
Views: 13814
Size:  30.6 KB
Name:  2011-03-30185808.jpg
Views: 13656
Size:  23.8 KB
Name:  2011-04-07111607.jpg
Views: 13948
Size:  37.3 KB
Name:  2011-04-07112208.jpg
Views: 13764
Size:  30.3 KB

Very tight fit!
Name:  2011-03-18130739.jpg
Views: 13718
Size:  68.1 KB

If using a LS1 intake and it has EGR you'll need to plug the EGR hole
Name:  BjnB2WQmkKGrHqUOKiEEsmg93JLBLURQBWC-1.jpg
Views: 13695
Size:  1.0 KB
Name:  BjnBBwCGkKGrHqMOKjUEsnLfv9gBLURPl0k8w_3.jpg
Views: 13616
Size:  19.8 KB
Name:  BjnB7fQBWkKGrHqEOKi0EsmBQm8BLURQbDy7_3.jpg
Views: 14049
Size:  22.1 KB

The plug pictured up above is found on E bay. You can also use Dorman 555-025 freeze plug for the EGR hole.

Now it is time to move onto the Vacuum fitting, and mod it for our power brake hose.

Drill the factory fitting out. Work your way up to a 7/16 drill bit.
Name:  2011-03-30181530-1.jpg
Views: 13698
Size:  46.4 KB
Name:  2011-03-30181631-1.jpg
Views: 13869
Size:  44.0 KB

Next tap the hole with a 1/4-18 pipe tap
Name:  2011-03-30185138-1.jpg
Views: 13921
Size:  39.0 KB

And install a 1/4 thread 1/2 hose fitting using 3M adhesive as sealer. This will allow the factocy brake hose to remain in the stock location. No clamps required.
Name:  32007.jpg
Views: 13596
Size:  5.1 KB

Move onto the bottom of the intake. The lower ribing will needs to be removed if using the DOD tray.
Name:  290x3t2-1.jpg
Views: 17290
Size:  50.5 KB

Here is what the bottom of the intake should look like after sanding or light grinding. Some intakes have curved bottoms and some are flat. Some DOD valley covers are thicker then others too! Remove a little at a time.
Name:  0820BOTTOM20OF20INTKAE.jpg
Views: 13470
Size:  2.8 KB

Brians TB adapter for use with headers
Name:  da699baa-3.jpg
Views: 13648
Size:  36.4 KB

Drill and tap the star area with 7/16 drill, and tap with a 1/4-18 pipe tap and install a 1/4 pipe to 3/8 hose fitting for the dirty air PCV. The hose will go from fitting to the rear valve cover. Install with 3M adhessive.
Name:  32006.jpg
Views: 13445
Size:  5.1 KB

I used LS6 injectors with LS6 fuel rail
Name:  IMG_0037-1.jpg
Views: 14103
Size:  30.3 KB

Which required pigtail adapters EV1 to EV6. This allows us to use our stock harness. I have also include a pic of the MAP extension harness.
Name:  IMG_0025-1.jpg
Views: 13698
Size:  26.3 KB

You can also use one piece adapters.
Name:  mustangtuning_2144_168536199.jpg
Views: 13611
Size:  14.6 KB

Now... In order to use the LS6 injectors/rail, you will need to remove your alt, and the alt bracket. The rear hump on the bracket has to be cut flush. It's pretty easy to figure out. Just use a vise and a hacksaw.
Name:  LS6-01_Ridiculously_Hard_To_Get_Bol.jpg
Views: 14531
Size:  65.9 KB

Here is a picture of the moddified bracket.
Name:  IMG_0029-2.jpg
Views: 13501
Size:  20.9 KB

Tons of clearance now!
Name:  IMG_0034-2.jpg
Views: 13608
Size:  37.5 KB

Everything assembled. MAKE SURE YOU BLOW THE INTAKE OUT WITH AIR TO REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DRILLING AND TAPING BEFORE INSTALL!!
Name:  IMG_0053-1.jpg
Views: 14705
Size:  47.6 KB

Now it is time to move onto the DOD tray.
IF USING DOD LIFTERS, THEN YOU MUST USE THE DOD TRAY, even if the DOD is tuned out.

The OPSU will not clear the intake, so the OPSU port needs to be cut down to the DOD oil feed, and rewelded at an angle. 30* seems to work pretty good. Have a fab shop do the moddification. Try to retain the DOD filter if you can. If not, then be prepared for a clogged solenoid, or collapsed lifter if you decided to keep the DOD functional.
Name:  manifold20clearance201-1.jpg
Views: 13754
Size:  50.9 KB

The DOD connector needs to be trimed down too, so pull the DOD connector out of the tray.
Name:  IMG_7413.jpg
Views: 13686
Size:  62.0 KB

Next split into two
Name:  IMG_7414.jpg
Views: 13606
Size:  58.8 KB

Trim the connector down as far as you can go. Then solder and heat shrink everything back together
Name:  LS6-06_Modified_DOD_Connector.jpg
Views: 13703
Size:  36.1 KB

IF YOU DO NOT PLAN ON USING DOD, THEN YOU CAN JUST PULL THE CONNECTOR FROM THE TRAY, AND WELD THE HOLE UP. JB WELD WILL WORK TOO! However.. The DOD Solenoids must remain intact. So bolt them back onto the tray after welding the OPSU at an angle

Tray isready to go. DOD still functionial!
Name:  LS6-08_Modded_Truck_VLOM.jpg
Views: 13913
Size:  57.4 KB

Intake manifold bolts Guide

Install and ensure that all 10 intake manifold bolts are hand threaded as far as they'll go, tighten them down with a wrench and then torque in the order shown in the picture on the left. You need to torque these down in a 2-pass fashion..the first pass, tighten to 44 INCH-lbs, then, on the 2nd pass torque them to 89 INCH-lbs. Again, note those specs are in INCH lbs. If you don't have an inch pounds torque wrench, just tigthen the bolts hand tight...its only about 7 ftlbs of torque on that final pass and the intake seals with rubber gaskets so its doesn't need much pressure at all to seal.
Name:  IMAGE017.jpg
Views: 13472
Size:  27.1 KB

Intake installed pic
Name:  1295839296294.jpg
Views: 13534
Size:  13.4 KB
Name:  2011-01-23192312.jpg
Views: 14114
Size:  50.1 KB

New fuel line location. Bendings and twisting is not required.
Name:  1295839350365.jpg
Views: 13386
Size:  12.8 KB

OPSU pic
Name:  1295839424542-1.jpg
Views: 13650
Size:  10.8 KB

Vacuum hose routing
Name:  2011-03-18130809.jpg
Views: 14195
Size:  57.6 KB

Why the LS6 injectors and rail?
Well, for one... they are a bolt on item, and for two.. the LS6 injectors are pretty close to the LS4 injectors. LS6 are rated at 28.8lb and the LS4 injectors are a tad over 28lb. (58psi)

I'd rather cut up my alt bracket then the intake.

The engine will fire right up with the LS6 stuff, and will drive just fine till tuning. YOU WILL NEED TUNING.

SEE PAGE 4 FOR MORE PICS AND DETAILS!

Last edited by DavidGXP; 09-14-2012 at 07:36 PM. Reason: Added flow numbers
Old 03-01-2011, 09:38 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mad props to TiredGXP, Sittingmongoose, and nmp0098.
Old 03-02-2011, 07:37 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
TheMonteMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: nj
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agreed. awesome job. great write up. easy to follow.
Old 03-02-2011, 11:18 AM
  #4  
Launching!
 
NHRA T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great writeup! I'm more at ease on doing this now.
Old 03-02-2011, 11:31 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
 
Sadden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wait are you guys KEEPING the LS4 Throttle body?
Old 03-02-2011, 11:49 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
 
nmp0098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice work. I have some alternatives to throw out there.

1) You don't have to grind the bottom of the manifold if you use the newer VLOM. I wouldn't grind it smooth regardless; I'd take off as little material as possible.

2) I'm not convinced that taking that much material from the alternator bracket is wise. It's actualy a 2-2.5 HP generator (no OEM has used what is technically an alternator for years) that wants to torque out of alignment when heavily loaded. There are other fuel rail options, too. The LS3, L76, LS7, L99, etc. all have injectors of the same physical size as ours, and the mounting tabs on the fuel rail could be modified for the LS6 intake fairly easily.

I want to make it clear that flow rate is only half of the story when it comes to injectors. It only describes an injector that is 100% on. Make sure that you have access to tuning software that can change injector Offset vs. MAP vs. Volts and the Short Pulse Adder, which are used to compensate for the injector opening and closing. You can somewhat compensate for them by using fictitious MAF and VE data, but you will never get consistent fueling doing that, especially during transients.


Finally, in my opinion most people should just spring for the LS6 intake. If you already in for $500+, why not spend the extra $250 for more torque everywhere (albeit not much at lower and middle RPMs) and more RPM potential if you do decide to cam the engine? Guys have spent more for less horsepower (see all of the K&N kits people buy, and the headers give you less HP/$ than springing for the LS6 would). The gap only grows the with additional mods.
Old 03-02-2011, 02:16 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
JDMC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Highland, MI
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nmp0098
Finally, in my opinion most people should just spring for the LS6 intake. If you already in for $500+, why not spend the extra $250 for more torque everywhere (albeit not much at lower and middle RPMs) and more RPM potential if you do decide to cam the engine? Guys have spent more for less horsepower (see all of the K&N kits people buy, and the headers give you less HP/$ than springing for the LS6 would). The gap only grows the with additional mods.
I agree, STOCK LS1's w/ LS6 intake make roughly 10-15hp over the LS1 intake.........that's why they cost more. The gains would be very similar on an LS4.
Old 03-02-2011, 02:17 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nmp0098
I'm not convinced that taking that much material from the alternator bracket is wise. It's actualy a 2-2.5 HP generator (no OEM has used what is technically an alternator for years) that wants to torque out of alignment when heavily loaded.
I was afraid to remove material thinking that the bracket might fail.
This has not been the case. I have had this bracket on for about almost a yr now. About 12k miles to be exact. When I swapped intakes last yr I installed the bracket. In fact.... the stock bracket is cast iron and weighs about 13lbs. With grinding and drilling small holes into it, I have got it down to 8lbs.
Again, not a single problem..

Originally Posted by nmp0098
There are other fuel rail options, too. The LS3, L76, LS7, L99, etc. all have injectors of the same physical size as ours, and the mounting tabs on the fuel rail could be modified for the LS6 intake fairly easily.
LS1/LS6 returnless rails are bolt on.. no modifications required with EV6 injectors. With the shorter EV1 injectors (LS4) then yes.. fuel rail mods are required. I was just going the easy route.
Originally Posted by nmp0098
I want to make it clear that flow rate is only half of the story when it comes to injectors. It only describes an injector that is 100% on. Make sure that you have access to tuning software that can change injector Offset vs. MAP vs. Volts and the Short Pulse Adder, which are used to compensate for the injector opening and closing. You can somewhat compensate for them by using fictitious MAF and VE data, but you will never get consistent fueling doing that, especially during transients..
100% correct. Tuning will be required. I was running very rich. I am using the Diablo sport Predator and had to make a few minor adjustments. Not perfect yet but.. I'd say very close. Even if one was to adapt the stock injectors, they would need to retune.

Originally Posted by nmp0098
Finally, in my opinion most people should just spring for the LS6 intake. If you already in for $500+, why not spend the extra $250 for more torque everywhere (albeit not much at lower and middle RPMs) and more RPM potential if you do decide to cam the engine? Guys have spent more for less horsepower (see all of the K&N kits people buy, and the headers give you less HP/$ than springing for the LS6 would). The gap only grows the with additional mods.
I have a ported LS6 comming in on Saturday (ported is probably a waste of $$) for my up comming cam swap. It just seems fitting too me. LS6 intake with LS6 heads. I have a 2001 LS6 MAF that I wanna install too.. But after looking at the stock LS4 tb opening. ( A little over 3 1/4) I am not going to bother. LS6 DBW tb has a 75mm throttle blade with a TB opening that is about 4".

Last edited by DavidGXP; 03-02-2011 at 02:22 PM.
Old 03-02-2011, 02:26 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sadden
Wait are you guys KEEPING the LS4 Throttle body?
Yes sir!
Old 03-02-2011, 02:38 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
JDMC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Highland, MI
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidGXP

I have a 2001 LS6 MAF that I wanna install too.. But after looking at the stock LS4 tb opening. ( A little over 3 1/4) I am not going to bother. LS6 DBW tb has a 75mm throttle blade with a TB opening that is about 4".


You will get gains by swapping to that larger maf, even with the stock TB.
Old 03-02-2011, 04:19 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
nmp0098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidGXP
This has not been the case. I have had this bracket on for about almost a yr now. About 12k miles to be exact. When I swapped intakes last yr I installed the bracket. In fact.... the stock bracket is cast iron and weighs about 13lbs. With grinding and drilling small holes into it, I have got it down to 8lbs.
Again, not a single problem..
I still wouldn't recommend it. I haven't failed a lifter yet with the high lift cam and I'm still using the stock style timing chain tensioner without issues, but that doesn't mean that I would recommend it to anyone as reliable long-term. Some speed shops are blowing out the stock tensioner with only a couple dyno pulls on a cam. I've also had the engine to 7000RPM several times without any issues, but I wouldn't recommend doing that either. I'm not being critical of your method, but I would say that there is risk involved and anyone attempting this should be aware of it. To put it another way, unless you did a DFMEA on the modified part and compared it to stock, you can't say it's perfectly OK. Clearly the part is not as strong as it was before, and without additional information it's impossible to say how much, if at all, you compromised the integrety of the belt system. So go ahead and do it, but take off as little material as possible and don't leave sharp angles to keep local stress/strain increases at a minimum.


Originally Posted by DavidGXP
LS1/LS6 returnless rails are bolt on.. no modifications required with EV6 injectors. With the shorter EV1 injectors (LS4) then yes.. fuel rail mods are required. I was just going the easy route.
Agreed, but you also had to get electrical adapters. I think if this is going to be a definitive source, then all of the options should at least be mentioned.


Originally Posted by DavidGXP
I have a ported LS6 comming in on Saturday (ported is probably a waste of $$) for my up comming cam swap. It just seems fitting too me. LS6 intake with LS6 heads. I have a 2001 LS6 MAF that I wanna install too.. But after looking at the stock LS4 tb opening. ( A little over 3 1/4) I am not going to bother. LS6 DBW tb has a 75mm throttle blade with a TB opening that is about 4".
I saw in increase in MAP at WOT (and yes, I looked at barometric pressure as well to make sure it wasn't weather) after swapping in an 85mm MAF. There's a little power there, and my MAF was only $25 + a couple connectors from the dealer. These MAFs also have more sensing elements (more consistent signal to the ECM) and read the same airflow at a lower output frequency (meaning my ECM can read more airflow before pegging the MAF, which may or may not come into play).
Old 03-02-2011, 06:47 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nmp0098
I still wouldn't recommend it. I haven't failed a lifter yet with the high lift cam and I'm still using the stock style timing chain tensioner without issues, but that doesn't mean that I would recommend it to anyone as reliable long-term. Some speed shops are blowing out the stock tensioner with only a couple dyno pulls on a cam. I've also had the engine to 7000RPM several times without any issues, but I wouldn't recommend doing that either. I'm not being critical of your method, but I would say that there is risk involved and anyone attempting this should be aware of it. To put it another way, unless you did a DFMEA on the modified part and compared it to stock, you can't say it's perfectly OK. Clearly the part is not as strong as it was before, and without additional information it's impossible to say how much, if at all, you compromised the integrety of the belt system. So go ahead and do it, but take off as little material as possible and don't leave sharp angles to keep local stress/strain increases at a minimum.
Excellent points and if I ever lose a belt, break a tensioner, or something was to happen out of the blue with my charging system then I'll consider the bracket the fault.
AlabamaGuy, has the same set up on his engine and we both drive our cars very hard. So far... we have not encountered any problems. (Knock on wood)
The bracket is freaking heavy duty.. man.

Not trying to be a dick or anything.. but I'd much rather cut up the bracket then modify the stock fuel rail and end up having something bust and spray fuel all over my hot engine. (My kind of luck)

Guess there is a risk with everything we do..


Originally Posted by nmp0098
I saw in increase in MAP at WOT (and yes, I looked at barometric pressure as well to make sure it wasn't weather) after swapping in an 85mm MAF. There's a little power there, and my MAF was only $25 + a couple connectors from the dealer. These MAFs also have more sensing elements (more consistent signal to the ECM) and read the same airflow at a lower output frequency (meaning my ECM can read more airflow before pegging the MAF, which may or may not come into play).
What coupler did you use to attach your MAF to your TB? According to my messurements I would need a 3 1/4 to 4. Also, I have noticed your are using the CAI kit. What filter are you using?


You should do a 85mm MAF write up.
Old 03-02-2011, 07:14 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
fieroguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 824
Received 197 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Good start to a potential sticky thread.

My only suggestion is to break each step down and list the details of each proven options for each step, just to make it the most informative. This would give the end users the various options to solve the clearance/fit/interface issues at each step.
Old 03-02-2011, 07:24 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fieroguru
Good start to a potential sticky thread.

My only suggestion is to break each step down and list the details of each proven options for each step, just to make it the most informative. This would give the end users the various options to solve the clearance/fit/interface issues at each step.
I was kind of thinking the same.
When my LS6 gets here I'll take a bunch of pics
Old 03-02-2011, 07:40 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Mels SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Orleans La
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And the install to
Old 03-02-2011, 07:47 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mels SS
And the install to
Don't push it buddy..
J/k
Old 03-02-2011, 08:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
 
nmp0098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidGXP
Guess there is a risk with everything we do..
Indeed sir. We are both committed, so I'm really talking to the next guy to come along. If I do catch fire, well, that's the risk you take when you dick around with anything that is working perfectly fine as it is.


Originally Posted by DavidGXP
What coupler did you use to attach your MAF to your TB? According to my messurements I would need a 3 1/4 to 4. Also, I have noticed your are using the CAI kit. What filter are you using?


You should do a 85mm MAF write up.
I used a 4" to 3.5" bending reducer and tightened it down good. It needs to be a 3.75" to 3.25" reducer, and you can cobble it together with any number of combinations of two pieces. The 85mm MAF is 4" in and 3.75" out. I used a Spectre filter... they filter just as well as K&N, are cheaper, and most importantly they work with a 4" inlet out of the box. Again, tuning is a must. Maybe I'll do a write up sometime, but I didn't take a single picture.

My MAF is mounted to the airbox, so no more clocking issues for me!


EDIT: Also, if you are interested, I am willing to help with the text of the thread.
Old 03-02-2011, 09:00 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nmp0098
My MAF is mounted to the airbox, so no more clocking issues for me!

I have a Specter cone filter in the garage. It's the one with the reducers, and is a very nice piece.
Can you snap a pic of the MAF in the box for me? Putting it in the box is a smart move, and I have thought about it.. I think I'd need a smaller cone filter though...

Originally Posted by nmp0098
EDIT: Also, if you are interested, I am willing to help with the text of the thread.?
Help would be nice. How should we go about it? Would you PM suggestions?
Old 03-02-2011, 09:06 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
 
Sadden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So we have LS6 Heads
When we do this mod wouldn't it make sense to do the LS6 MAF , Throttle body , And fueling(injectors and rails) all at the same time.

Otherwise the stock TB and MAF are still a major restriction and we wouldn't really see the true potential of this swap. Just my thoughts.
Old 03-02-2011, 09:22 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
DavidGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sadden
So we have LS6 Heads
When we do this mod wouldn't it make sense to do the LS6 MAF , Throttle body , And fueling(injectors and rails) all at the same time.

Otherwise the stock TB and MAF are still a major restriction and we wouldn't really see the true potential of this swap. Just my thoughts.
Would make a lot of since... if you can figure out how to get the LS6 TB to work, with our electronics

Last edited by DavidGXP; 03-03-2011 at 12:46 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: LS1/LS2/LS6 intake swap Sticky!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.