Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Edmunds Dyno-Test - 2011 Dodge Charger R/T HEMI

Old 03-22-2011, 12:01 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Edmunds Dyno-Test - 2011 Dodge Charger R/T HEMI

Dyno Tested: 2011 Dodge Charger R/T







By Jason Kavanagh | March 21, 2011

"How is it possible that we've never dynoed a Hemi Charger?" The question hung in the air like an apostrophe as we pondered the burnt orange 2011 Dodge Charger R/T in our stable.

We've dynoed many flavors of Mopar including Challengers in R/T and SRT8 trims, a Viper, even a Ram. But never a Charger.

Have Charger, will dyno. Off to MD Automotive's Dynojet we went.

The 2011 Charger R/T carries a 5.7-liter V8 dishing up 370 bhp at 5,250 rpm and 395 lb-ft at 4,200 rpm. It's backed by five-speed autobox. With its iron block and pushrod-actuated two valves per cylinder, this mill might appear to be lifted directly out of the sixties. However, it sports a few modern twists.

The new Hemi's got the ability to shut down half of its cylinders by essentially 'collapsing' the hydraulic lifters that actuate four of its eight intake valves. This cylinder deactivation system saves fuel during certain part-throttle situations by increasing the engine load (e.g., opening the throttle) on the remaining four cylinders.

That's all well and good, but this is a dyno test. And that's where the Hemi's variable valve timing can be put to good effect. All of its valves are actuated by a single cam; the variable timing mechanism adjusts both intake and exhaust valve timing in lockstep (only the Viper had a concentric-cam arrangement to facilitate independent valve timing for the intake and exhaust valve timing in a pushrod engine).

The Hemi's VVT may be something of a compromise, but it still allows the torque to plumped up a bit by improving volumetric efficiency across the rev range. The result can be seen below:



The Charger generates a peak of 393 lb-ft at 4260 rpm, while turning out more than 350 lb-ft at any point north of 2800 rpm. Its power peak of 360 horsepower arrives right at the 5300 rpm rev limit. Note that this is lower than the 5800 rpm in Dodge's literature due to a 140-and-change mph speed limiter encountered while on the dyno.

It's nice, too, that the Charger's automatic transmission doesn't downshift of its own accord when in manual mode. Many autoboxes (the Ram's included) overrule your better judgement in this situation when pedal meets carpet.

That little hitch in the torque curve at 4700 rpm was present in every one of the eight or so runs on the dyno. It's more of a curiosity than anything, since it was so repeatable and did occur in a particularly detonation-sensitive part of the torque curve. You'd normally see this kind of stuff happen at peak torque where cylinder pressures are higher.

We came away from this test impressed -- the standard-issue workaday Hemi V8 is quite healthy, comfortably generating more power than what Chrysler claims. Imagine if it wasn't forced to lug around so much car.

Old 03-22-2011, 12:05 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Wow, making some solid power and underrated at that, very nice.
Old 03-22-2011, 03:12 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

im surprised. very impressive.
Old 03-22-2011, 03:36 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
ChaseSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Wow, making some solid power and underrated at that, very nice.
I always like it when they're underrated
Old 03-24-2011, 04:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
turbowhistle86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: middle of nowhere, IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

now put this motor into a 2 seater along the lines of a Chrysler-based competitor to the Solstice and we'll be impressed! Anyone have a Prowler they'd like to donate?
Old 03-25-2011, 10:09 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
NJNETSFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Royal Oak, Mi
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I really love these cars. The design really sticks out to me and besides the Taurus Sho, what is it's main competition?
Old 03-25-2011, 10:12 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
98silvermaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

impressive
Old 03-25-2011, 11:22 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NJNETSFAN
I really love these cars. The design really sticks out to me and besides the Taurus Sho, what is it's main competition?
For what they charge it really doesn't have any.
Old 03-29-2011, 10:38 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are those numbers right? No Way it could be.
Old 03-30-2011, 08:05 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by camaro98z28
Are those numbers right? No Way it could be.
I test drove one at Larry Miller Dodge. After some wheel time I'm much more apt to believe the numbers now, they feel pretty strong. Right up there with the L99 Camaro I rented for a week.
Old 03-30-2011, 10:28 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That is some Serious Underation. LOL
Originally Posted by TriShield
I test drove one at Larry Miller Dodge. After some wheel time I'm much more apt to believe the numbers now, they feel pretty strong. Right up there with the L99 Camaro I rented for a week.
Old 03-30-2011, 10:37 AM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camaro98z28
That is some Serious Underation. LOL
No kidding, I'm shocked. Was this a new engine or that same old 5.7 that came in all the MOPAR R/T's?
Old 03-30-2011, 10:40 AM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
No kidding, I'm shocked. Was this a new engine or that same old 5.7 that came in all the MOPAR R/T's?
The 5.7 was updated with VVT, etc. The new 392 replaced the 6.1 and is apparently quite underrated as well.
Old 03-30-2011, 09:08 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
 
CoolAid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like it. The new oranger orange color on them with the 69-70 tails and door curves are sick. I wish GM had something like this out right now.
Old 04-08-2011, 01:38 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

The graph does tell its HP, not RWHP...I hate when they do that. So we guess its RWHP. We must not forget that RWHP is an unknown term for the mass...


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Edmunds Dyno-Test - 2011 Dodge Charger R/T HEMI



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.