Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

W8 vs. V8

Old 07-10-2010, 02:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
texas94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Keller, Texas
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default W8 vs. V8

W8



V8



The W8 block is smaller, lighter, and most importantly has 8 cylinders. Volkswagen failed at their DOHC W8 because of the cost. However, what if GM engineered a OHV W8? Efficiency anybody????

Discuss.
Old 07-11-2010, 02:11 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
gta3uzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That looks like it would be a pain in the *** to work on.
Old 07-11-2010, 06:40 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Unecessarily complex. What do the heads look like?

I think this was designed so that they could fit a V8 in a transverse FWD application.

New ideas and technology only stick if they are better in all areas such as performance, cost, reliability and size.

I read that GM is now working on a direct injected V8. Not sure if it's LS based, or a completely new design.
Old 07-11-2010, 11:35 AM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quadruple turbo W16 is where its at
Old 07-11-2010, 04:34 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06 6.0 GTO
Quadruple turbo W16 is where its at
Not when a twin turbo 408-427 LS1 will make more power.
Old 07-11-2010, 05:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
zacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats actually kind of cool looking, not to mention you could make a W10 look about the same size as a v8. except for the fact the cylinder heads are probably huge. not to mention the possible advantage of turning lateral force into rotational force in 2 more different directions on the crankshaft.
Old 07-11-2010, 06:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Not when a twin turbo 408-427 LS1 will make more power.
making 1000hp on 16 cylinders will always be more reliable then 1000hp on 8 cylinders considering both motor are made properly

let me simplify that. if you need to lift up a very heavy table, who will be more tired at the end of the day, 8 people or 16 people lifting that same table ? yes both of the groups will be able to lift it but the 16 people group will be able to do it more times.

yes, if the 16 cylinder motor is not built properly it will not be able to make 1000hp reliable but in case of the veyron motor it is.
Old 07-11-2010, 06:22 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zacht
thats actually kind of cool looking, not to mention you could make a W10 look about the same size as a v8. except for the fact the cylinder heads are probably huge. not to mention the possible advantage of turning lateral force into rotational force in 2 more different directions on the crankshaft.
yea but have you seen the crankshaft on a W8 engine ? i personally do not think you will able to spin the motor very fast with a crank like that
Old 07-12-2010, 07:07 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would have a look a Narrow angle V engines if you are intrested in W engines. VW VR6 and R32/36 engines are pretty impresive. heads are BIG though! also keeping them cool is a BIG problem as you have very long exhaust ports.

Also there was a W8 engine used in a W8. hoever i heard the bottom end was very weak as it could only run 3 main bearings!

Regards,

Chris.
Old 07-12-2010, 09:50 AM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd rather have an inline 8.
Old 07-12-2010, 01:10 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by elias_799
making 1000hp on 16 cylinders will always be more reliable then 1000hp on 8 cylinders considering both motor are made properly

let me simplify that. if you need to lift up a very heavy table, who will be more tired at the end of the day, 8 people or 16 people lifting that same table ? yes both of the groups will be able to lift it but the 16 people group will be able to do it more times.

yes, if the 16 cylinder motor is not built properly it will not be able to make 1000hp reliable but in case of the veyron motor it is.
But then you get into the problem of paying twice as many people, fueling twice as many people, etc. And last time I checked a proberly build twin turbo 427 LS motor is damn reliable. I wonder what the price difference is? I be the LS gets better fuel economy also.

The W motors are a neat idea, but I don't like the fact that you have different length intake and exhaust ports. How the hell do you tune that for power?? And how does the crank take power pulses from so many different angles?? And like stated above; the crank loses room for main caps being so short with so many rods strapped to it.
Old 07-12-2010, 03:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

dam that looks complicated to build and machine. prolly sohc or dohc since i cant see cam tunnel bore.
Old 07-12-2010, 05:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My friend has a W8 in his VW. It breaks all the time and to work on? ha good luck. Yeah is sounds good but its junk to me. Thinks hes hot **** cause he can kill hondas. Not a chance againts my old TBSS...
Old 07-13-2010, 02:23 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

how about a flat 16 engine? here is how napier did it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Sabre

Chris.
Old 07-13-2010, 07:58 AM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
dam that looks complicated to build and machine. prolly sohc or dohc since i cant see cam tunnel bore.
Yes they are DOHC.
Old 07-13-2010, 09:59 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Not when a twin turbo 408-427 LS1 will make more power.
If thats how we will play then ill take a 3.0 2jz or 2.0 4g63 which make equal power

Thats just as valid a comparison
Old 07-13-2010, 10:45 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06 6.0 GTO
If thats how we will play then ill take a 3.0 2jz or 2.0 4g63 which make equal power

Thats just as valid a comparison
2jz ftw oops did i say that on an LS board?!
Old 07-13-2010, 11:04 AM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06 6.0 GTO
If thats how we will play then ill take a 3.0 2jz or 2.0 4g63 which make equal power

Thats just as valid a comparison
Yes, all three are much more valid options than the VW quad turbo W16 when it comes to price, packaging, parts support, etc. Of course we could get into the powerband/torque/useable power argument also.

I just think the W16 is overly complex and unjustifyable from a business standpoint. Now a VR8 like the VR6 might be a more interesting notion.........
Old 07-14-2010, 02:32 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Yes, all three are much more valid options than the VW quad turbo W16 when it comes to price, packaging, parts support, etc. Of course we could get into the powerband/torque/useable power argument also.

I just think the W16 is overly complex and unjustifyable from a business standpoint. Now a VR8 like the VR6 might be a more interesting notion.........
VR8 would be intresting. Would be a little longer than a normal V8, probably the length of a inline 6. However you would have 2 extra cylinders. hmmm bet that would look intresting with a pair of T70 turbos hanging off one side! lol
Old 07-14-2010, 01:09 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Not when a twin turbo 408-427 LS1 will make more power.
it wont last as long nor be as cool and as useable

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: W8 vs. V8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.