The LS7: How was it created? - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Advanced Engineering Tech
Log In 
Search


Advanced Engineering Tech
For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents
Sponsored by
Whipple Super Chargers


The LS7: How was it created?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2011, 08:47 AM   #1
TECH Regular
 
lovescamaros28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 446
Default The LS7: How was it created?

I understand the LS7 is a NA 7.0L engine that powers the Z06 Vette,but how do they actually go about boring a LSX block to 4.125. I know it has a 4.000 stroke also. Even with re-sleeving arent the cylinder walls paper thin? I have heard you can only bore an LS1 out to around .005 and the LS2 is a bit beefier at .030.(lol)Just curiousity but if anyone has knowledgable input I would like to get some education on how it was achieved.
lovescamaros28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2011, 01:48 PM   #2
TECH Fanatic
 
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit ROCK City
Posts: 1,484
Default

A big factor is that the Ls7 cylinder block assembly includes pressed-in cylinder sleeves and forged steel main bearing caps. Pressed-in cylinder sleeves are used to allow the large 104.8-mm bore while the six-bolt, doweled-in-place CNC-machined forged steel main caps offer the superior strength required at the LS7's power level. The smaller-displacement LS2 engine (101.6-mm bore x 92-mm stroke) has cast-in cylinder sleeves and powder metal main caps.

You can do some more reading here:http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/LS7.shtml
But that is the main idea. Its a lil different block than a stand. ls2 and with the use of coated and better parts like titanium rods, it is able to take the beating and not break easily.
__________________
00' Silver Formula Ws6 M6 {1of233}
00' Silver Z28 M6 SOLD
95' White 3.8l Camaro
*UPDATED 8/7/13*Ls1/6 Parts For Sale Here
TurboSmart Fuel Pressure Regulator For Sale NIB. PM for details.
Fb0dy0nly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2011, 08:58 AM   #3
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 766
Default

Simple. It is a different casting to the other LS blocks. It is purpose cast for the larger bores and has the right amount of wall thickness around the cylinders.

As Fbody notes, the liners are pressed in to accurately machined bores in the block. The regular blocks with the cast in liners can have the liner 1mm or so off centre in relation to the bore centerline. The LS7 liners a dead on and they also have different design bulkheads etc than the same LS blocks when they were introduced. Design features that were adapted into the LS3 etc blocks later.
rsz288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 11:54 AM   #4
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,855
Default

Ok, first off, the bore spacing of the LSx is the same as the GenI and GenII SBC which is 4.400". So, accomodating a 4.125" bore is not an issue.

The issue with the Ls1 and Ls2 and having a larger bore is the thickness of the cylinder liner in the block to start with. You have an aluminum block with a steel cylinder liner. The liners are cast iron which suffer some core shift during block casting.

Bottom line is the LS7 just has a sleeve which is larger in diameter than the Ls1/Ls2. it is also a bit longer to accomodate the longer stroke of the Ls7.

The dimension of a LS-2 block are @4.280 thickness of the outer part of the liner with an inner bore of 4.000 with a max tollerable over bore of .030 giving a GM min tolerable wall thickness of .125/3.125mm if the block has zero core shift. Since there is almost always core shift, that minimum wall thickness will vary and why bore is limited to .030.

You could in theory bore an Ls1/Ls2 block slighly larger if you sonic check all the bores and can verify the core shift on the liners in the block.

As an FYI with a re-sleeve using a dry sleeve (like a Darton) you can take a LSx block out to 4.185"
J-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 09:17 AM   #5
TECH Resident
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Right here, right now!
Posts: 766
Default

Hardly any need to sonic check, they are very obvious when they are off centre. Very obvious. The eccentricity can be measured with a ruler.
rsz288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 11:19 AM   #6
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,855
Default

My point was with the core shift is that what you see at the top may not always be the same at the bottom of the cylinder. If you want to go more than the recommended overbore, a soinc check is the best way to verify it.
J-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ls9 vs ls7 vs ls3 heads on a ls3 bp944 Generation IV Internal Engine 10 09-26-2014 04:38 PM
4.070 lq9 block will be ok on boost? 01 blue ss Forced Induction 7 06-04-2012 03:13 PM
bore vs stroke CJRiojas Advanced Engineering Tech 16 10-06-2010 01:34 PM
LS3 head gaskets marksboy7 Generation IV Internal Engine 8 08-04-2009 10:33 AM
ls7 bore? lsxlowtech Generation IV Internal Engine 14 09-16-2008 11:00 AM


Tags
block, bore, created, cylinder, liners, ls1, ls7, pressedin, pressing, sleave, sleeve, sleeves, thickness, thinckness, wall


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details