Gapless vs Conventional rings in boosted application...
10-28-2006, 08:40 PM
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gapless vs Conventional rings in boosted application... I am curious what the prevailing wisdom on this board is concerning the two different ring types in boosted applications...
And which groove do you think it is better to run the gapless ring on, the first or second ring groove and why...?
Also what kind of end gap do you like on both the first and second ring gap for boosted application...?
And which groove do you think it is better to run the gapless ring on, the first or second ring groove and why...?
Also what kind of end gap do you like on both the first and second ring gap for boosted application...?
Last edited by Sledgehammer; 10-28-2006 at 08:50 PM.
10-28-2006, 09:30 PM
#4
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Bay, CA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Only on the top is a gapless worth something.
Trending Topics
10-29-2006, 07:07 PM
#12
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK...Lots of "talk? about "unmentionable's"...
But it's a little short on info for the original questions...
As far as these two posts...What seems to be the thinking on why a gapless ring in the second ring groove is not a good idea in boosted applications...?
But it's a little short on info for the original questions...
As far as these two posts...What seems to be the thinking on why a gapless ring in the second ring groove is not a good idea in boosted applications...?
Only on the top is a gapless worth something.
I'm with you on that one. Do you know where I can find a good article to that effect, got a guy that swears by 2nd gapless rings - compiling a case against them. Didn't D. Morgan write something a while back?
