Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Advanced Engineering Tech
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Advanced Engineering Tech
For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents
Sponsored by
Whipple Super Chargers

Valvetrain weight concerns with Caddy lifters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2007, 12:18 PM   #1
TECH Addict
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 2,632
Default Valvetrain weight concerns with Caddy lifters

Not sure if this belongs in Advanced or regular, but I'll start here and someone can relocate it if it's inappropriate

I've read a little somewhere about the Caddy racing lifters supporting a much lighter valvetrain in the endurance motors. Will the increased valvetrain mass cause longevity problems in a street/autox/road race vehicle unless I use hollow unobtainium valvetrain components instead of typical valves, dual springs, pushrods, etc?

Also, do we have specs on how much open/close spring pressure as well as lobe lift these Caddy lifters will control?
__________________
1998 NBM Camaro Z28
377ci LS3,FastToys 85mm lid,TSP 100mm MAF,Nick Williams 92mm TB,Rick Crawford Modified LS3 intake,EPS 222/230 112+2,ARH 1.75" headers & catted y-pipe,SLP Dual/Dual,LS7 clutch,Fidanza 13lb flywheel,3.73s,Eaton Differential,Unbalanced Engineering LPHB/LCAs/TA,Koni DAs,650#F coilover springs,300#R on weight jacks,35/24 sway bars,C4 ZR1 17x11 wheels all around on 315/35/17 NT05s
Excel tools: Compression calculator & PipeMax,Engine Analyzer Pro testing

Last edited by JimMueller; 06-16-2007 at 01:04 PM..
JimMueller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 08:48 PM   #2
TECH Addict
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,152
Default

I was under the impression that the Caddy lifters were lighter than the conventional pieces, though I never could find the actual weights.

Mike
__________________
1995 Z28
388 LT4, AFR 210's, Home built T-76GTS turbo system
TH-350, Vigilante 10.5", Ford 9"
engineermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 08:50 PM   #3
11 Second Club
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,623
Send a message via AIM to speed_demon24
Default

I think hes asking since they used the caddy lifter in engines with a light valvetrain if they will still perform in a street car with a heavier valvetrain.
__________________
2014 Focus ST
http://ls1tech.com/forums/vehicle-cl...p-386rwtq.html
97 Z28 M6 4.10's 430rwhp/386.7rwtq 11.89@120.2 1.93 60'[/B]
Engine - stock shortblock, Ai 200cc heads/cam, jethot longtubes, 2otl, cai, asp u/d pulley, 58mm tb
Suspension - Koni's, strano springs, strano swaybars, umi phb, C5 brakes
speed_demon24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2007, 09:22 PM   #4
TECH Veteran
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 12
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,286
Send a message via AIM to Wnts2Go10O
Default

the caddy lifters are fine. just dont spin it to 8500 on a heavier valvetrain. your setup will determine how long they last, which, im sure is a long while.
__________________
89 Camaro RS: 6.0L, L92 heads, Patriot Golds, LS7 cam, Spec Flywheel, Ram Clutch, T56, Pro 5.0, Lous Short Stick, L76 Intake, Holley 90mm TB, 42LB delphi injectors, 255 Pump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by President George W. Bush
I think the national anthem ought to be sung in English, and I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English and they ought to learn to sing the national anthem in English.
May 1 2011
Wnts2Go10O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 03:29 PM   #5
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 230
Default

The tech department is a little out of my realm but. The spring adds the load on the lifter, that's the resistence. So what is the spring pressure on the caddy lifter - ls6 spring ie: light. The reason for a light valvetrain is so the ls6 spring can handle higher rpms and last 100k+. A heavy valvetrain isn't the worst thing you just need enough spring to control it at a given rpm. vavlefloat...... (also spring maybe lifter life)
__________________
'99Z M6, '77Z M4 & The old '75 camaro
DJ_951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 03:43 PM   #6
Launching!
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 212
Default

Where you want to try to save the most weight in a valvetrain is on the spring side of the rocker fulcrum. Lifter weight and pushrod weight has a little effect on your valvetrain dynamics. The biggest reason why you see light pushroads in some racing is that they are trying to achieve a "spring board" effect from them and actually storing energy in the pushrod.

Lighter is still better on that side, but for the sake of durablity sometimes not worth it.
__________________
RYE
Yeahdoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 08:10 AM   #7
Launching!
 
MSURacing's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 296
Default

The lightweight lifter is not the assembly itself. The magic is inside. If you need more info, contact me.
MSURacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 07:21 PM   #8
On The Tree
 
grinder11's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MSURacing
The lightweight lifter is not the assembly itself. The magic is inside. If you need more info, contact me.
I have spoken with SDPC recently about ordering a set of these for my motor. I have had some issues recently w/my Futral cam and it's questionable heat treat (Or lack thereof!) and since I had to buy a new cam, as one lobe was scored, I figured that with 30,000 miles on a Hi-Po motor, I should replace the lifters also. I did not see any unusual wear on any of the lifters, but they are stock hydraulic rollers and figured that, if nothing else, these new "Caddy" lifters might provide a little over-rev insurance, and maybe a few extra ponies over 6200 R's or so. SDPC quoted a $225.00 price for 16 of them. Pace in Ohio has stock replacements (OEM), like I have been using, for $118.00, which sounds awful cheap for even the stock pieces. You said to ask about these new Caddy lifters, so here I am!! Thanks in advance.
__________________
'00 C5 convertible-LS7 Block/Heads-Comp Cam-Kooks 1-7/8 headers-Flowmasters
grinder11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2007, 02:38 PM   #9
TECH Addict
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 2,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MSURacing
The lightweight lifter is not the assembly itself. The magic is inside. If you need more info, contact me.
You have a PM.

How about the pushrod wall thickness and diameter? Will 3/8 x .08 be sufficient for a 145/390 dual spring? Should I use the recommended preload of .060 for the Caddy lifters? I read reducing the preload will help...

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=413469
__________________
1998 NBM Camaro Z28
377ci LS3,FastToys 85mm lid,TSP 100mm MAF,Nick Williams 92mm TB,Rick Crawford Modified LS3 intake,EPS 222/230 112+2,ARH 1.75" headers & catted y-pipe,SLP Dual/Dual,LS7 clutch,Fidanza 13lb flywheel,3.73s,Eaton Differential,Unbalanced Engineering LPHB/LCAs/TA,Koni DAs,650#F coilover springs,300#R on weight jacks,35/24 sway bars,C4 ZR1 17x11 wheels all around on 315/35/17 NT05s
Excel tools: Compression calculator & PipeMax,Engine Analyzer Pro testing
JimMueller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2007, 02:38 PM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply


Tags
caddy, concern, effect, ford, lifters, lighter, log, ls1tech, mn, push, rod, train, valve, weight


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Join Ls1Tech

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details