4L60 Not shifting on time on 2-3 shift only at WOT
#1
4L60 Not shifting on time on 2-3 shift only at WOT
I've been over the tune and can't figure out what's going on. I have the WOT rpm & speed adjusted to shift @ 60mph & 4650rpm & the PCM will not command the shift. This truck has 4.88 gears & 37" tires & the speedo has been calibrated to reflect gps accuracy. The owner of the truck did have the trans rebuilt & the builder did just a standard build but did turn up the force motor current so high that it sometimes barks the tires on the shift. Another factor is that even though in the tune I have it commanded to shift @ 4650 RPM, the ecu doesn't send the signal for 3rd gear till later, so I don't know if its a line pressure issue or not.
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
You need to make sure all MPHs for full throttle match in all tables. Also, program the full throttle mph trigger first and rpm second but do them right. Full throttle doesn't need to be at 4k something rpms. You need to log actual RPM vs speed so you know where to set it. If I want my car to shift at say 6500 or 65 mph I must command an earlier shift. So let's say 59 mph = 5900 rpm and 62 mph = 6200 rpm, I would command 59 mph and 6200 rpm for a 6500 actual shift with a 6800 limiter. The PCM needs to see speed first, rpm second, then has to have time to send the command and the Trans complete it. Can you post a tune file so we can look at it?
#3
You need to make sure all MPHs for full throttle match in all tables. Also, program the full throttle mph trigger first and rpm second but do them right. Full throttle doesn't need to be at 4k something rpms. You need to log actual RPM vs speed so you know where to set it. If I want my car to shift at say 6500 or 65 mph I must command an earlier shift. So let's say 59 mph = 5900 rpm and 62 mph = 6200 rpm, I would command 59 mph and 6200 rpm for a 6500 actual shift with a 6800 limiter. The PCM needs to see speed first, rpm second, then has to have time to send the command and the Trans complete it. Can you post a tune file so we can look at it?
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
So i know.....What's the desired shift rpm? When is it actually shifting? What's the limiter? I will look at it when I get to a laptop and report back.
Trending Topics
#14
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
Right off the bat: Part throttle shift, all 4 tables dont match in the 94-100% columns- normal performance cruise hot should all match each other. Full throttle normal, performance and hot dont match either other either. Full throttle rpm tables dont match. Get all these sync'd 100% in the full throttle region.
Up-Shift pressure looks a tad weak, force motor is ok, shift time Id run .250 in the upper half of the table.
4579rpm=60mph. You are commanding both triggers at almost identical times. MPH needs to be met first. Lower the 60mph down to say 55 to give it some breathing room, then it will meet that criteria and shift off of rpm only.
Up-Shift pressure looks a tad weak, force motor is ok, shift time Id run .250 in the upper half of the table.
4579rpm=60mph. You are commanding both triggers at almost identical times. MPH needs to be met first. Lower the 60mph down to say 55 to give it some breathing room, then it will meet that criteria and shift off of rpm only.
#15
Right off the bat: Part throttle shift, all 4 tables dont match in the 94-100% columns- normal performance cruise hot should all match each other. Full throttle normal, performance and hot dont match either other either. Full throttle rpm tables dont match. Get all these sync'd 100% in the full throttle region.
Up-Shift pressure looks a tad weak, force motor is ok, shift time Id run .250 in the upper half of the table.
4579rpm=60mph. You are commanding both triggers at almost identical times. MPH needs to be met first. Lower the 60mph down to say 55 to give it some breathing room, then it will meet that criteria and shift off of rpm only.
Up-Shift pressure looks a tad weak, force motor is ok, shift time Id run .250 in the upper half of the table.
4579rpm=60mph. You are commanding both triggers at almost identical times. MPH needs to be met first. Lower the 60mph down to say 55 to give it some breathing room, then it will meet that criteria and shift off of rpm only.
4650=60mph see.
#16
Moderator
Wshummer: While you are correct that the "Hot" table can be very modest to protect the trans, I also like to set the Normal and Performance tables the same.
We strongly suggest that you set the 94%-100% column in the Partial Table to agree with the WOT table. (However I think you do - I looked at it last night).
HOWEVER I absolutely agree with the 01ssreda4 the the WOT MPH needs to be set much lower at least to 55MPH (which then also means setting the Partial Throttle table to match). I set my MPH to about 15% lower than the max RPM I want to experiment with. That way at the track I can experiment by only setting the WOT RPM table and ignoring the WOT MPH table.
01ssreda4 has probably helped many dozens of people with similar problems and his suggestions nearly always solved it. Indeed your log that 4650==60MPH guarantees that you will have problems using those values in the tune.
We strongly suggest that you set the 94%-100% column in the Partial Table to agree with the WOT table. (However I think you do - I looked at it last night).
HOWEVER I absolutely agree with the 01ssreda4 the the WOT MPH needs to be set much lower at least to 55MPH (which then also means setting the Partial Throttle table to match). I set my MPH to about 15% lower than the max RPM I want to experiment with. That way at the track I can experiment by only setting the WOT RPM table and ignoring the WOT MPH table.
01ssreda4 has probably helped many dozens of people with similar problems and his suggestions nearly always solved it. Indeed your log that 4650==60MPH guarantees that you will have problems using those values in the tune.
#17
Wshummer: While you are correct that the "Hot" table can be very modest to protect the trans, I also like to set the Normal and Performance tables the same.
We strongly suggest that you set the 94%-100% column in the Partial Table to agree with the WOT table. (However I think you do - I looked at it last night).
HOWEVER I absolutely agree with the 01ssreda4 the the WOT MPH needs to be set much lower at least to 55MPH (which then also means setting the Partial Throttle table to match). I set my MPH to about 15% lower than the max RPM I want to experiment with. That way at the track I can experiment by only setting the WOT RPM table and ignoring the WOT MPH table.
01ssreda4 has probably helped many dozens of people with similar problems and his suggestions nearly always solved it. Indeed your log that 4650==60MPH guarantees that you will have problems using those values in the tune.
We strongly suggest that you set the 94%-100% column in the Partial Table to agree with the WOT table. (However I think you do - I looked at it last night).
HOWEVER I absolutely agree with the 01ssreda4 the the WOT MPH needs to be set much lower at least to 55MPH (which then also means setting the Partial Throttle table to match). I set my MPH to about 15% lower than the max RPM I want to experiment with. That way at the track I can experiment by only setting the WOT RPM table and ignoring the WOT MPH table.
01ssreda4 has probably helped many dozens of people with similar problems and his suggestions nearly always solved it. Indeed your log that 4650==60MPH guarantees that you will have problems using those values in the tune.
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
I do understand the differences in the tables believe me. I've always been taught for the truest most consistent auto Trans behavior (wot, obviously not wanting to hit the limiter) is to sync all the columns. I realize wot is separate from part throttle, but there is still 94 and 100 throttle columns on the part throttle table. If the wot 100 is on a different table, it makes sense for them to match so that no matter where the computer reference the behavior is predictable.....and so on and so fourth. I'm not trying to pick apart your tune but we are here to pick apart your tune
#19
I do understand the differences in the tables believe me. I've always been taught for the truest most consistent auto Trans behavior (wot, obviously not wanting to hit the limiter) is to sync all the columns. I realize wot is separate from part throttle, but there is still 94 and 100 throttle columns on the part throttle table. If the wot 100 is on a different table, it makes sense for them to match so that no matter where the computer reference the behavior is predictable.....and so on and so fourth. I'm not trying to pick apart your tune but we are here to pick apart your tune