Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anybody use the Yank pro extreme 4200 stall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2007, 06:51 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Cool anybody use the Yank pro extreme 4200 stall?

what kind of ET's did you gain after the install and what mods were done at that time?
Old 08-29-2007, 06:27 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

anybody?
Old 08-29-2007, 06:31 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
TLewis4095's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have the 4500 and 60' 1.53, 11.17@ 129 with 330 RWHP. I like it.
Old 08-29-2007, 08:46 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TLewis4095
I have the 4500 and 60' 1.53, 11.17@ 129 with 330 RWHP. I like it.
now thats what I'm talkin' bout! whats the whole combo if you don't mind me asking? I would take that 330rwhp but runs 11.17@129 all day!
Old 08-29-2007, 08:54 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
 
gyrene2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chesapeake va
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

sounds like a setup that really pushes the limits! That is awesome. U have to give a mods list. obviously u have some really good suspension!
Old 08-29-2007, 02:02 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DannoWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central MA
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TLewis4095
I have the 4500 and 60' 1.53, 11.17@ 129 with 330 RWHP. I like it.
Yeah, I'm gonna have to raise the Bullshit flag on that one. 129mph!
Old 08-29-2007, 02:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TLewis4095
I have the 4500 and 60' 1.53, 11.17@ 129 with 330 RWHP. I like it.

To run 129 mph with just 330 rwhp would probably take a sub 3000lb car.
Putting a 129 mph against an 11.17 ET smells like NOS being sprayed after the 60' mark to me.
Old 08-29-2007, 02:52 PM
  #8  
Launching!
 
nick1ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: STL
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep. alot of nos after 60ft!
Old 08-29-2007, 04:09 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I think it was a TYPO and it should read 119mph!
Old 08-30-2007, 10:17 AM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i'm going to guess a typo as well - in my old car i ran almost identical times - 11.17@119 with a 1.51 60'.

so i'm going to guess he meant to type 119 instead of 129mph. and i'll be his car is VERY light.
Old 08-30-2007, 02:41 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

11.17 @ 119 is a good heads and cam car, or a light cam only car. Even if it is 119 mph, to do that with 330 rwhp takes a superlight car. Think about something like an 04 Zo6. Easily exceeds 330 rwhp, has pretty good gearing, and they don't trap 119 on a regular basis.

Last edited by Ragtop 99; 08-30-2007 at 02:47 PM.
Old 08-30-2007, 02:48 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
DannoWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central MA
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If he's making 330 unlocked on a Mustang dyno and his car weighs under 3000#'s. Maybe...

I'm still skeptical.
Old 08-30-2007, 03:27 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TLewis4095
I have the 4500 and 60' 1.53, 11.17@ 129 with 330 RWHP. I like it.
is that 4500 a Yank or Vigalante or what?
Old 08-31-2007, 08:33 AM
  #14  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
ack5005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cullman,AL
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got it in mine. I like it!

With a Vig3200, LS1 intake, headers, hooker catback, superchips tune, on stock 17" wheels w/Nittos, and full weight; I ran a 1.75 60' 8.20 1/8th 8X? MPH. The track and nittos were not doing my car any justice.

Since then I've added LS6 intake, MS3 cam, UD pulley, Moser 9" 3.70, full suspension minus adj. shocks, MT radials with skinnies, removed about 50lbs, replaced the vig with the PE4200, and swapped to TSP duals, added ported TB and a tune. Here's the results - 1.56 60' 7.34 1/8th 96MPH.

This converter is meant for high RPMs. Cam only I spun it to 6200 RPMs. I might have done better with a PT series at the time. But I'm keeping it in cause I'm getting heads for the car and I'll be spinning it up to 6800. So I'm kind of curious how it will do. After that I'll see how it handles a 150 shot.
Old 08-31-2007, 09:06 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ack5005
I've got it in mine. I like it!

With a Vig3200, LS1 intake, headers, hooker catback, superchips tune, on stock 17" wheels w/Nittos, and full weight; I ran a 1.75 60' 8.20 1/8th 8X? MPH. The track and nittos were not doing my car any justice.

Since then I've added LS6 intake, MS3 cam, UD pulley, Moser 9" 3.70, full suspension minus adj. shocks, MT radials with skinnies, removed about 50lbs, replaced the vig with the PE4200, and swapped to TSP duals, added ported TB and a tune. Here's the results - 1.56 60' 7.34 1/8th 96MPH.

This converter is meant for high RPMs. Cam only I spun it to 6200 RPMs. I might have done better with a PT series at the time. But I'm keeping it in cause I'm getting heads for the car and I'll be spinning it up to 6800. So I'm kind of curious how it will do. After that I'll see how it handles a 150 shot.
good to hear! how does it drive around town in DD??? and I was told it is a NO,NO for nitrous use?
Old 08-31-2007, 09:20 AM
  #16  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
ack5005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cullman,AL
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Compared to the Vig it slips more but I'm use to it. Plus once you roll your foot in the throttle you forget all about it slipping. The only thing that bothers me sometimes is with the duals and cam... It's loud as hell when going up a hill! I had the hooker catback on there after I put the stall in. It was a real nice ride, just slips more than the vig. I'll be going back to that soon. Also I know for a fact that lower gears will make it feel tighter. I wish I could compare it against a PT4400. I've always wanted to see what the difference was.

As far as nitrous, I'm doing it anyway. There's a lot of things not built for nitrous but people do it anyway. If it's too much off the line I'll do a progressive! I know I won't get the best time with nitrous and that converter but I like being all motor in the end. Nitrous would just be something to play with.
Old 08-31-2007, 11:13 AM
  #17  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
11.17 @ 119 is a good heads and cam car, or a light cam only car. Even if it is 119 mph, to do that with 330 rwhp takes a superlight car. Think about something like an 04 Zo6. Easily exceeds 330 rwhp, has pretty good gearing, and they don't trap 119 on a regular basis.

check out the quickest bolt-on cars list - there are a few guys running 119 or better. yes it takes a super light car... but there are plenty of guys out there with super light cars.
Old 08-31-2007, 01:59 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by imslow
check out the quickest bolt-on cars list - there are a few guys running 119 or better. yes it takes a super light car... but there are plenty of guys out there with super light cars.
I hope to be on that list very soon!
Old 09-03-2007, 02:31 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ack5005
Compared to the Vig it slips more but I'm use to it. Plus once you roll your foot in the throttle you forget all about it slipping. The only thing that bothers me sometimes is with the duals and cam... It's loud as hell when going up a hill! I had the hooker catback on there after I put the stall in. It was a real nice ride, just slips more than the vig. I'll be going back to that soon. Also I know for a fact that lower gears will make it feel tighter. I wish I could compare it against a PT4400. I've always wanted to see what the difference was.

As far as nitrous, I'm doing it anyway. There's a lot of things not built for nitrous but people do it anyway. If it's too much off the line I'll do a progressive! I know I won't get the best time with nitrous and that converter but I like being all motor in the end. Nitrous would just be something to play with.
can you keep me personally posted with your results?
Old 09-04-2007, 11:24 AM
  #20  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
ack5005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cullman,AL
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Omega Doom
can you keep me personally posted with your results?
Sure thing, I'll let you know what it does with the heads on. I should have the car back soon. And then it's off to the track!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.