Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

GM-Chrysler Merger News and Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2008, 09:39 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Morbid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Colony, TX
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Exclamation GM-Chrysler Merger News and Discussion

It's breaking news on CNBC right now. They're saying as of today, the merge between GM and Chrysler is a 50/50 chance. It seems Cerberus is still in talks with Nissan and Renault.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/bu...hp&oref=slogin

G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger

DETROIT — General Motors is in preliminary talks about a possible merger with Chrysler, a deal that could drastically remake the landscape of the auto industry by reducing the Big Three of Detroit automakers to the Big Two.

The talks between G.M. and Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm that owns Chrysler, began more than a month ago, and the negotiations are not certain to produce a deal. Two people close to the process said the chances of a merger were “50-50” as of Friday and would most likely still take weeks to work out.

A merger would be a historic event, with two of the most iconic names in American industry coming together to survive in an increasingly difficult environment. Both have roots dating back decades in Detroit and, with Ford, long dominated the auto industry — until Japanese and other foreign car makers began making inroads into the American market.

The auto industry is being pummeled from all sides — by high gas prices that have soured consumers on profitable S.U.V.’s, by a softening economy that has scared shoppers away from showrooms, and by tight credit that is making it difficult for willing buyers to obtain loans. Both G.M. and Chrysler have been struggling with product lineups that are out of sync with consumer demand for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.

General Motors’ stock has fallen from more than $42 a share last year to less than $5, and it is burning through its cash hoard at a rapid rate. Chrysler, as a private company, no longer needs to report its finances.

The meetings between General Motors and Cerberus began more than a month ago, said people familiar with the discussions, and the companies have held several talks involving their most senior executives. Given that both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling, the two sides may determine a merger may not be in their best interests.

The exploratory talks have included debates over various calculations of the savings that would result from a merger, these people said, but neither side has yet to dig into each others’ private financial books and records.

At the same time, Cerberus is continuing to hold talks with other automakers including Nissan and Renault, said people familiar with the discussions. It is unclear at what stage those discussions have reached.

Speculation about a possible bankruptcy filing by G.M. has mounted in recent weeks because of the automaker’s dwindling cash reserves. The automaker had $21 billion in cash on hand at the end of the second quarter, but it was burning through more than $1 billion a month.

The credit rating firm Standard & Poor’s put G.M. on negative credit watch on Thursday.

But G.M. has said it is confident that it can increase its liquidity, and emphasized in a statement released Thursday that it was not considering a bankruptcy filing.

G.M. once commanded about 50 percent of market, but its share so far this year has fallen to 22 percent, according to the research firm Autodata. Chrysler had a market share of about 15 percent before acquisition in 1998 by Daimler, but its share this year has dwindled to 11 percent.

How government and labor react to a potential merger of G.M. and Chrysler is unclear. There could be antitrust questions raised, but political issues could be overshadowed by the precarious financial prospects of both automakers.

If G.M., the nation’s largest automaker, combined operations with Chrysler, the smallest of Detroit’s Big Three, they would create an auto giant that would surpass Japan’s Toyota Motor Company, which recently has been battling G.M. for bragging rights as the world’s largest automaker.

A G.M. spokesman declined to comment on any specific talks with Chrysler. “Without referencing this specific rumor, as we’ve often said G.M. officials routinely discuss issues of mutual interest with other automakers,” said the spokesman, Tony Cervone. There was no immediate comment from Cerberus.

People briefed on the deal said the talks started as an exploration of possible joint venture opportunities between G.M. and Chrysler.

Cerberus acquired an 80.1 percent stake in Chrysler in August 2007 for $7.4 billion from the German automaker Daimler AG.

Under the terms of the deal being discussed, Cerberus would end up owning an unspecified equity stake in G.M.-Chrysler, according to people briefed on the talks.

The ramifications of the merger would be enormous in the global auto industry. G.M. and Chrysler together would control more than 35 percent of the United States vehicle market, and be by far the dominant producer of pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and minivans.

It would also marry such iconic American brands as G.M.’s Chevrolet and Cadillac with Chrysler’s Jeep and Dodge divisions.

However, the potential merger carries enormous risks. Both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling mightily in what is the worst market for vehicle sales in the United States in 15 years.

People close to the discussions said that if the prospective deal did not happen, Cerberus would probably look to Nissan and Renault.

But the marriage of G.M. and Chrysler has far more potential than hitching Chrysler to a foreign automaker. While G.M. and Chrysler may be hamstrung by labor contracts from cutting jobs, the two companies could combine dealers, product lines and advanced vehicle technology.

Bill Vlasic reported from Detroit and Andrew Ross Sorkin from New York.
Old 10-10-2008, 09:47 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

What money does GM have to do this in the first place?

I think they should stay separate, really.
Old 10-10-2008, 10:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
BeefTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Looks like GM and Chrysler will merge!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/bu...hp&oref=slogin

G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This
Print
Reprints
Share
Linkedin
Digg
Facebook
Mixx
Yahoo! Buzz
Permalink


By BILL VLASIC and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Published: October 10, 2008
DETROIT — General Motors is in preliminary talks about a possible merger with Chrysler, a deal that could drastically remake the landscape of the auto industry by reducing the Big Three of Detroit automakers to the Big Two.

Skip to next paragraph Add to Portfolio
General Motors Corp

Go to your Portfolio »
The talks between G.M. and Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm that owns Chrysler, began more than a month ago, and the negotiations are not certain to produce a deal. Two people close to the process said the chances of a merger were “50-50” as of Friday and would most likely still take weeks to work out.

A merger would be a historic event, with two of the most iconic names in American industry coming together to survive in an increasingly difficult environment. Both have roots dating back decades in Detroit and, with Ford, long dominated the auto industry — until Japanese and other foreign car makers began making inroads into the American market.

The auto industry is being pummeled from all sides — by high gas prices that have soured consumers on profitable S.U.V.’s, by a softening economy that has scared shoppers away from showrooms, and by tight credit that is making it difficult for willing buyers to obtain loans. Both G.M. and Chrysler have been struggling with product lineups that are out of sync with consumer demand for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.

General Motors’ stock has fallen from more than $43 a share last year to less than $5, and it is burning through its cash hoard at a rapid rate. Chrysler, as a private company, no longer needs to report its finances.

The meetings between General Motors and Cerberus began more than a month ago, said people familiar with the discussions, and the companies have held several talks involving their most senior executives. Given that both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling, the two sides may determine a merger may not be in their best interests.

The exploratory talks have included debates over various calculations of the savings that would result from a merger, these people said, but neither side has yet to dig into each others’ private financial books and records.

At the same time, Cerberus is continuing to hold talks with other automakers including Nissan and Renault, said people familiar with the discussions. It is unclear at what stage those discussions have reached.

Speculation about a possible bankruptcy filing by G.M. has mounted in recent weeks because of the automaker’s dwindling cash reserves. The automaker had $21 billion in cash on hand at the end of the second quarter, but it was burning through more than $1 billion a month.

The credit rating firm Standard & Poor’s put G.M. on negative credit watch on Thursday.

But G.M. has said it is confident that it can increase its liquidity, and emphasized in a statement released Thursday that it was not considering a bankruptcy filing.

G.M. once commanded about 50 percent of the American vehicle market, but its share so far this year has fallen to 22 percent, according to the research firm Autodata. Chrysler had a market share of about 15 percent before its acquisition in 1998 by Daimler, but its share this year has dwindled to 11 percent.

How government and labor might react to a potential merger of G.M. and Chrysler is unclear. Antitrust questions could be raised, but political issues could be overshadowed by the precarious financial prospects of both automakers.

If G.M., the nation’s largest automaker, combined operations with Chrysler, the smallest of Detroit’s Big Three, they would create an auto giant that would surpass Japan’s Toyota Motor Company, which recently has been battling G.M. for bragging rights as the world’s largest automaker.

A G.M. spokesman declined to comment on any specific talks with Chrysler. “Without referencing this specific rumor, as we’ve often said G.M. officials routinely discuss issues of mutual interest with other automakers,” said the spokesman, Tony Cervone.

There was no immediate comment from Cerberus.

People briefed on the deal said the talks started as an exploration of possible joint venture opportunities between G.M. and Chrysler.

Cerberus acquired an 80.1 percent stake in Chrysler in August 2007 for $7.4 billion from the German automaker Daimler AG.

Under the terms of the deal being discussed, Cerberus would end up owning an unspecified equity stake in G.M.-Chrysler, people briefed on the talks said.

The ramifications of the merger would be enormous in the global auto industry. G.M. and Chrysler together would control more than 35 percent of the United States vehicle market, and be by far the dominant producer of pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and minivans.

It would also marry such iconic American brands as G.M.’s Chevrolet and Cadillac with Chrysler’s Jeep and Dodge divisions.

However, the potential merger carries enormous risks. Both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling mightily in what is the worst market for vehicle sales in the United States in 15 years.

People close to the discussions said that if the prospective deal did not happen, Cerberus would probably look to Nissan and Renault.

But the marriage of G.M. and Chrysler has far more potential than hitching Chrysler to a foreign automaker. While G.M. and Chrysler may be hamstrung by labor contracts from cutting jobs, the two companies could combine dealers, product lines and advanced vehicle technology.
Old 10-10-2008, 10:23 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BLK85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WOW!!! I doubt it will happen but what if....
Old 10-10-2008, 10:23 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
BeefTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How could this get moved out of the lounge....seriously
Old 10-10-2008, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (92)
 
~JOSHUA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ummm... this has already been posted.

Look below, or above depending on time...
Old 10-10-2008, 10:25 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BeefTip
How could this get moved out of the lounge....seriously
How could it not...seriously.

We have a forum specifically for Automotive News.
Can you think of a single even that would be more worthy
of being in the Automotive News forum than Chrysler & GM
potentially merging?

...besides, it's a repost.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1000133
Old 10-10-2008, 11:04 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

God, let's hope this isn't for real.

A merger would exacerbate the problems both companies have which are fundamentally the same. It wouldn't cure anything.

Cerberus is dying to unload Chrysler onto anyone and GM is basically broke. A marriage made in Hell.
Old 10-10-2008, 11:08 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (92)
 
~JOSHUA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
God, let's hope this isn't for real.

A merger would exacerbate the problems both companies have which are fundamentally the same. It wouldn't cure anything.

Cerberus is dying to unload Chrysler onto anyone and GM is basically broke. A marriage made in Hell.
I have good credit.... maybe I can buy it, on an adjustable rate interest only mortgage type loan with preferred stock options after 6 months....
Old 10-10-2008, 11:15 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ~JOSHUA
I have good credit.... maybe I can buy it, on an adjustable rate interest only mortgage type loan with preferred stock options after 6 months....
Need a partner?
Old 10-10-2008, 11:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
wabmorgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USS Enterprise 1701
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
God, let's hope this isn't for real.

A merger would exacerbate the problems both companies have which are fundamentally the same. It wouldn't cure anything.

Cerberus is dying to unload Chrysler onto anyone and GM is basically broke. A marriage made in Hell.
:wtf:

Actually I think GM execs must be watching Charles Bronson's movies.

DEATHWISH comes to mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 10-10-2008, 11:27 PM
  #12  
Banned
iTrader: (92)
 
~JOSHUA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
Need a partner?
yeah... the first order of business after the dust settles is to make a new Trans Am. "Bad as hell" is the base option, with HOLY $#!+ as the optional package.
Old 10-10-2008, 11:31 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ~JOSHUA
yeah... the first order of business after the dust settles is to make a new Trans Am. "Bad as hell" is the base option, with HOLY #$% as the optional package.
The Vette could get the "Oh my Phuking God upgrade."
Old 10-11-2008, 12:02 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
 
05CherryGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This could get really weird. We all know how GM loves to recycle cars, so we could end up:

Chevy Camaro
Dodge Challenger
Pontiac Firebird
-All the same car

Chevy Corvette
Dodge Viper
-Same Car

Dodge Ram
Sierra
Silverado
-Same Truck

How weird would that be?
Old 10-11-2008, 01:01 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
wabmorgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USS Enterprise 1701
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ~JOSHUA
yeah... the first order of business after the dust settles is to make a new Trans Am. "Bad as hell" is the base option, with HOLY $#!+ as the optional package.
Now there's a plan if I ever heard one!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 10-11-2008, 02:46 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hmm.
Challenger SS?
Camaro SRT-8?
Silverado Ram Cummins Turbo Diesel?
Corvette SRT/10?



Though I'd rather see GM and Ford merge, this would be one seriously LARGE American car company no doubt.
Old 10-11-2008, 03:40 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Vicinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Hmm.
Challenger SS?
Camaro SRT-8?
Silverado Ram Cummins Turbo Diesel?
Corvette SRT/10?



Though I'd rather see GM and Ford merge, this would be one seriously LARGE American car company no doubt.
Good engines and good rear ends! Finally! Too bad that's down there next to impossible.
Old 10-11-2008, 07:46 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

i dont think itll happen. neither of them is in good shape and it would just amplify GMs problems.
Old 10-11-2008, 08:32 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ugh god no, do not want a Mopar motor in my Camaro/Corvette.
Old 10-11-2008, 09:07 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
05CherryGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Hmm.
Challenger SS?
Camaro SRT-8?
Silverado Ram Cummins Turbo Diesel?
Corvette SRT/10?



Though I'd rather see GM and Ford merge, this would be one seriously LARGE American car company no doubt.
SRT 4 Firehawk.

Hey it has 4 doors and a supercharger, so it works.


Quick Reply: GM-Chrysler Merger News and Discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.