Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

2011 GT500 vs Corvete GS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2010, 11:20 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2011 GT500 vs Corvete GS

http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/co...d-shelby-gt500



The Chevrolet Corvette is the classic American sports car. The Ford Mustang is the quintessential American pony car. In the past, a decision between the two might have been easy: If you like going straight, choose the Mustang. If you occasionally stray onto a curvy back road or find yourself at a track day, opt for the low-slung Corvette. But the 2011 Ford Shelby GT500 is a pony that’s ready to run, straight or twisty, while the 2010 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport has the handling prowess of the Z06, but without that car’s 7.0-liter V-8—or its high price. So which car rules the American roost?

2010 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport
2010 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport
2010 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport

The Grand Sport replaces the Z51 in the Corvette model lineup. For roughly $6000 more than a base Vette, the GS gets the Z06’s brakes, dry-sump oiling (for its hand-built 436-bhp 6.2-liter LS3 V-8), wheel sizes, tires, front clip, hood and rear fenders. The Grand Sport shares the Z06’s anti-roll bars, but the springs and dampers are unique.

The result is handling performance about equal to the more expensive Z06. True, the GS suffers from slightly more understeer because of its weight (it uses a steel frame, as opposed to the Z06’s aluminum version) and softer springs, but it’s considerably more sporting than the previously offered Z51 performance package. And, it’s much less of a handful around the track than the Z06. There's still plenty of power, but the car is considerably less twitchy.

The handling numbers back this up, as the Grand Sport pulled 0.96g around the skidpad and averaged 70.7 mph through the slalom. But get this: The considerably heavier Ford Shelby GT500 Mustang managed an incredible 1.00g circling the skidpad, and was almost as quick through the slalom, with an average speed of 69.6 mph.

Of note, all Corvettes with manual transmissions now come standard with launch control. Foot to the floor, drop the clutch and feel (and hear) the awesomeness of this system. The distinctive pop and crackle as the engine control module manages torque with fuel and spark control is a beautiful thing.

With a base price of $54,770, the Grand Sport is a whopper of a bargain versus the Z06, costing nearly $20,000 less. Now that’s some math we can all appreciate.

2011 Ford Shelby GT500
2011 Ford Shelby GT500
2011 Ford Shelby GT500

Only last year, the Shelby GT500 received a serious makeover. Now the boys at Ford/SVT and Shelby have gone and done it again, dropping weight, adding power and giving it even more performance than the past-generation KR edition. From a pure numbers standpoint the new all-aluminum V-8 does little apart from removing about 100 lb. from the nose of the car. Power is up slightly thanks to a lower-backpressure exhaust that exhibits a bit more rumble than its predecessor. The newly introduced $3495 SVT Performance Package is the option that makes the biggest difference to the car’s dynamics. Larger Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar G:2 tires (265/40ZR-19 front, 285/35ZR-20 rear) really let the track-oriented suspension work. As our numbers show, the 2011 model trumps the “King of the Road” in every performance category, while hanging with, or besting, the Corvette Grand Sport.

At the test track, the Shelby’s 550-bhp supercharged 5.4-liter V-8 enabled it to consistently hit 60 mph in the mid-4s (the Grand Sport managed 4.1 seconds, although the cars tied to 100 mph—at 9.2 sec.) and suffered little to no heat soak after repeated runs. Around the skidpad, the SVT suspension worked its magic and resulted in exactly 1.00g, while the Grand Sport could only manage 0.96g. Think about that: A Mustang out-handling a Corvette! Since the Shelby’s suspension was designed more for the track than the road, it did give up some stability in our slalom, requiring a deft touch to keep the rear wheels planted; hence the reason the Shelby couldn’t quite match the Grand Sport’s slalom speed.

As an aside, the Shelby’s handling numbers are even better than the Ford GT we tested back in December 2003. Impressive stuff for a factory-modified Mustang to best a mid-engine exotic.

Conclusion

After the dust had settled, the Ford Shelby GT500 came out as the winner. It can hang right with the Corvette Grand Sport in acceleration and handling—and in some cases, such as the skidpad, even outperform it. What’s more, the Shelby’s starting price is about $6000 less, while its as-tested price is almost $13,000 less. Don’t get us wrong: The Corvette Grand Sport is one heckuva good car, and a true bargain in the Corvette world. But the Shelby GT500 is even more of a steal, and without question the most impressive Mustang we’ve ever driven.

Make/
Model

2010 Chevrolet
Corvette

2011 Ford Shelby
GT500
List price $54,770 $48,645
Price as tested $68,365 $55,537
Curb weight est 3360 lb 3820 lb
Engine, transmission 6.2-liter V-8, 6-sp manual 5.4-liter supercharged V-8, 6-sp manual
Horsepower, bhp @ rpm 436 @ 5900 550 @ 6200
Torque, lb-ft @ rpm 428 @ 4600 510 @ 4250
0-60 mph 4.1 sec 4.4 sec
0-100 mph 9.2 sec 9.2 sec
0-1320 ft (1/4 mile) 12.4 sec @ 116.5 mph 12.6 sec @ 118.9 mph
Top speed 190 mph* 155 mph*
Braking, 60-0 mph 112 ft 117 ft
Braking, 80-0 mph 197 ft 197 ft
Lateral accel (200-ft skidpad) 0.96g 1.00g
Speed thru 700-ft slalom 70.7 mph 69.6 mph
Old 10-07-2010, 04:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hmm the shelby with over 100hp advantage and judging by there numbers it looks like the gs came on top imo. numbers for the skidpad and lateral g's for the shelby are pretty impressive though
Old 10-07-2010, 04:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Never quite understood comparing the handling prowess of two cars using slalom, braking, and skidpad tests. Why not put them both on a road course and see how they do? Actually I'd love to see these two go head to head on a good road course. I know the new Shelby has been given some impressive improvements, I'm just curious as to whether its additional girth would counteract its power advantages on an actual track.

Either way, I'm glad to see Ford and GM still producing some outstanding specimens for their two legendary icons.
Old 10-07-2010, 04:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Weird how this is a comparison. The mustang seats 4. Quite an advantage.
Old 10-07-2010, 05:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Given my situation (family of 4 without the funds to have multiple badass performance cars), I'd opt for the GT500. Different people have different priorities.

I doubt the GT500 (which has 7-8mph in the 1/4 on the 5.0 GT) would get left in the dust by a GS on a road course. The 5.0 GT stays neck and neck on road courses with the new BMW M3.
Old 10-07-2010, 05:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06 6.0 GTO
Weird how this is a comparison. The mustang seats 4. Quite an advantage.
Run what you brung.

You'll see both at road racing events and drag nights too.
Old 10-07-2010, 06:04 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm...
They should have put the GT500 up against the base C6 to keep the prices closer.
Then again, the GT500 still wins.

Still an interesting read though.
Old 10-07-2010, 06:11 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I more surprised about the 2.4mph difference in trap speed. Interesting read though. I'm in he same boat as Ross which would make me choose the Shelby over the Vette.
Old 10-07-2010, 06:16 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -Ross-
I doubt the GT500 (which has 7-8mph in the 1/4 on the 5.0 GT) would get left in the dust by a GS on a road course. The 5.0 GT stays neck and neck on road courses with the new BMW M3.
You're correct based on what's available as a reference out there.
The only official lap time for the 2011 GT500 is a 2:58.48 at VIR, done by Ford themselves.
In contrast, the 2010 C6 GS ran a 2:58.8; driven by C&D.

In fact, the GT500 is barely slower than a C6 Z06 tested by C&D in '05. The C6Z ran a 2:58.2.

All three are very close on a track that represents a pretty good track capability benchmark.
Old 10-08-2010, 06:17 PM
  #10  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This time next year it will be the GT500 vs. the Z28... any bets?
Old 10-09-2010, 03:28 AM
  #11  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
fspeedster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
This time next year it will be the GT500 vs. the Z28... any bets?
Irunelevens---------------->>> Ford
Old 10-09-2010, 04:08 AM
  #12  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fspeedster
Irunelevens---------------->>> Ford
Bwahaha, you're kidding right?
Old 10-09-2010, 10:37 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
Run what you brung.

You'll see both at road racing events and drag nights too.
Very true, but with the GT500 i can bring some friends along and make for a more enjoyable trip. To me having 4 seats is a must.
Old 10-09-2010, 10:58 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
This time next year it will be the GT500 vs. the Z28... any bets?
It's hard to say really. The GT500 was considerably faster than the 09+ CTS-V around VIR, but GM looks like they're trying hard to make the Z28 a good road course performer. It should be pretty clear which should be better once/if GM releases any of the Z28's times around the ring.
Old 10-09-2010, 08:57 PM
  #15  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DiscerningZ32
It's hard to say really. The GT500 was considerably faster than the 09+ CTS-V around VIR, but GM looks like they're trying hard to make the Z28 a good road course performer. It should be pretty clear which should be better once/if GM releases any of the Z28's times around the ring.
My money will be on the Z28 simply because it's newer. From here on out, the newest release is going to be the best performer in the Chevy vs. Ford war. We're starting to probe the upper limits in what cars (as we know them) are going to be capable of doing on road courses. Things are going to be very close from now on.
Old 10-09-2010, 09:27 PM
  #16  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

We'll see... it won't be competitive enough I don't think unless it comes in under 4,000lbs
Old 10-09-2010, 10:26 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
We'll see... it won't be competitive enough I don't think unless it comes in under 4,000lbs
Competitive in stock form but unless hey add forged internals to the Z28 it'll only get worse once the mod bug hits.
Old 10-09-2010, 10:32 PM
  #18  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

To a certain extent... the LSA is proving to be able to handle some abuse on the stock internals, just not the HUGE numbers that the GT500 can handle.
Old 10-10-2010, 09:34 AM
  #19  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
We'll see... it won't be competitive enough I don't think unless it comes in under 4,000lbs
What makes you think it won't be under 4000lbs? I consider the under-4000lb attribute to be a given. I also consider the magneheteorogical damper system to be a given in this car...which is why I fully expect it to be the better performer all around...albeit just edging out the GT500 in all performance categories, but that's about the best you can expect these days with these nearly-4000lb cars with ungodly amounts of HP.

Keep in mind that the GT500 isn't really all that much faster than a standard SS. The GT500 does run about even with the CTS-V which has the same engine and damper system that the Z28 will have. The Z28 will be 300-400lbs lighter than the CTS-V however. The math is pretty simple from there.

Last edited by Blakbird24; 10-10-2010 at 09:39 AM.
Old 10-10-2010, 12:31 PM
  #20  
TECH Regular
 
Lethal Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
What makes you think it won't be under 4000lbs? I consider the under-4000lb attribute to be a given. I also consider the magneheteorogical damper system to be a given in this car...which is why I fully expect it to be the better performer all around...albeit just edging out the GT500 in all performance categories, but that's about the best you can expect these days with these nearly-4000lb cars with ungodly amounts of HP..
Well for starters the standard SS is 3800lbs and change. The added weight of the supercharger and supporting mods means if its not 4K pounds its gonna be damn close. Until they change the platform, weight will never be in this cars favor. Which means the Cobra still holds the edge here. This will be a good match up no doubt, but to go as far as saying it will edge out the GT500 in every catagory is wishful thinking IMO.

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
Keep in mind that the GT500 isn't really all that much faster than a standard SS. The GT500 does run about even with the CTS-V which has the same engine and damper system that the Z28 will have. The Z28 will be 300-400lbs lighter than the CTS-V however. The math is pretty simple from there.
When motor trend matched these two cars up the Cobra beat the SS by 29ft. Now the time in the quarter was pretty close but thats primarily because the Cobra had a hell of a time trying to get traction off the line on stock tires. A set of sticky tires and it wouldn't have been close at all.


Quick Reply: 2011 GT500 vs Corvete GS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.