Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:39 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel

Chrysler announced today that the Ram 1500 will offer a light-duty diesel engine when it goes into production this fall. Using the same turbocharged 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V6 recently introduced in the 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Ram 1500 is expected to get even better fuel economy than the current 2013 model's best-in-class 25 miles per gallon on the highway.

Power output has not been released for the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel, but in the Grand Cherokee, this engine produces 240 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque, and it will be paired with Chrysler's eight-speed automatic transmission. This has definitely been a busy and exciting year for the Ram division, bringing home major awards such as the 2013 North American Truck of the Year, 2013 Motor Trend Truck of the Year and 2013 Truck of Texas not to mention the recent announcement that the Ram HD models will offer a best-in-class towing capacity of 30,000 pounds – all of which is pointed out in the press release.
Article Link

TL;DR Highlights:
- 3.0L V6 turbo diesel + 8-speed auto transmission combo coming this year in Ram 1500
- estimated 240hp/420tq
- estimated/projected possibility of 30 mpg highway
Old 02-14-2013, 12:54 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Eco this, Eco that

Enough already with the greenwashing
Old 02-14-2013, 01:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

dear GM, you just got PWNED on the light duty diesel. morons. they couldve corned the market there.
Old 02-14-2013, 02:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
dear GM, you just got PWNED on the light duty diesel. morons. they couldve corned the market there.
Truth.
Old 02-14-2013, 03:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Why the **** has this taken so long? You get better than big V8 torque (same torque numbers as the current big V8s, but low end torque>>>>high end torque all the current V8s have), and WAY better gas mileage! I'm probably wrong, but I'm think Ford's Ecoboost engine is the top seller right now, and that's the closet a 1/2-ton truck has come to having a turbo diesel option. V8s have long gone the way of the dinosaur in the 3/4 and 1-ton market, no reason at all they should have taken this long putting them into the 1/2 tons.

Originally Posted by TriShield
Eco this, Eco that

Enough already with the greenwashing
And all this. Sick of Eco everything. It's those goddamn hippies fault!
Old 02-14-2013, 09:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
dear GM, you just got PWNED on the light duty diesel. morons. they couldve corned the market there.
Dodge getting there first is a big deal, but if GM (or anyone else) gets to the market cheaper with a turbo diesel, it is anyone's game.

That said, bonus points go to Dodge as their 3.0 V6 TD is already in the Jeep Grand Cherokee, so it is a proven power plant. Chrysler/Dodge will have the 1/2 ton market cornered for at least the next couple years with this setup. I'm very interested.
Old 02-14-2013, 11:07 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
Dodge getting there first is a big deal, but if GM (or anyone else) gets to the market cheaper with a turbo diesel, it is anyone's game.

That said, bonus points go to Dodge as their 3.0 V6 TD is already in the Jeep Grand Cherokee, so it is a proven power plant. Chrysler/Dodge will have the 1/2 ton market cornered for at least the next couple years with this setup. I'm very interested.
lol gm lost. they back burnered their small diesel never to have it heard from again.
Old 02-15-2013, 01:49 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
firebird99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
lol gm lost. they back burnered their small diesel never to have it heard from again.
Yeah gotta hate it when "BANKRUPTCY" gets in the way. I'm sure they would of liked to continue on with that engine program but it's better to still be in business.
Old 02-15-2013, 06:48 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by firebird99
Yeah gotta hate it when "BANKRUPTCY" gets in the way. I'm sure they would of liked to continue on with that engine program but it's better to still be in business.
Because they totally shut down their R&D department, and haven't come out with a single new thing since then? All of the big three have been scared to sell a diesel 1/2-ton in the US. That's almost all they sell in the 3/4 and 1-ton market, so I have no idea why they waited so long.
Old 02-15-2013, 07:24 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
ramairetransam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amsterdam Ny, the good part
Posts: 3,389
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

dont worry gm will come out with something in 6 yrs that has the same hp and tw and make it seem like they invented the wheel .

They are constantly late , the srt 4 neon 03 -05 then the cobalt ss comes out a yr later . **** like this happnes all the time . They are the apple of the car world. Lets be late and then make great marketing and it will all be awesome.
Old 02-15-2013, 08:09 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by firebird99
Yeah gotta hate it when "BANKRUPTCY" gets in the way. I'm sure they would of liked to continue on with that engine program but it's better to still be in business.
Good thing Chrysler didn't have a bankruptcy/take-over to worry about. Oh wait...
Old 02-15-2013, 10:01 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Rawr256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ramairetransam
dont worry gm will come out with something in 6 yrs that has the same hp and tw and make it seem like they invented the wheel .

They are constantly late , the srt 4 neon 03 -05 then the cobalt ss comes out a yr later . **** like this happnes all the time . They are the apple of the car world. Lets be late and then make great marketing and it will all be awesome.
x2

They are SLOW with putting anything in thought into production. Perfect example is the Camaro, seen it for how long and it took how long to throw it out there? Challenger for example seemed like it was a year process, we saw it and within the year you could buy it.

Than another issue they have is they give just crap for the first 1 maybe 2 years than release some upgraded version. If they jumped into this market, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they threw out a diesel without a turbo, than two years later "a new and improved version with a turbo" comes along.
Old 02-15-2013, 11:50 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
NW-99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 1,136
Received 170 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Agreed with GM being responsive and slow. What happened to GM, they used to lead the way in new designs and tech, now they just copy and paste. Good for Dodge, this is going to change the truck market forever. I would buy this before any gas 1/2 ton.
Old 02-15-2013, 02:47 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
93M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What sucks is that GM had diesels in there trucks before everyone else at one time and were the only ones to put diesels in there 1/2 tons from 78-81(shitty 5.7 Diesel) then the 6.2 diesel 82-93, and finally the 6.5 Turbo 92-00.
My old 6.2 Diesel '82 GMC got 23 MPG constantly and I loved that thing. I think there is still a huge market for a 1/2 ton diesel.
Old 02-15-2013, 02:54 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Jon5212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gocartone
Why the **** has this taken so long? You get better than big V8 torque (same torque numbers as the current big V8s, but low end torque>>>>high end torque all the current V8s have), and WAY better gas mileage! I'm probably wrong, but I'm think Ford's Ecoboost engine is the top seller right now, and that's the closet a 1/2-ton truck has come to having a turbo diesel option. V8s have long gone the way of the dinosaur in the 3/4 and 1-ton market, no reason at all they should have taken this long putting them into the 1/2 tons.



And all this. Sick of Eco everything. It's those goddamn hippies fault!
Except what I've been hearing is the Ecoboost F150 sucks in fuel mileage department if you are towing anything because it's always in boost does't make enough low end torque.

When I tow 10-15,000 pounds with my duramax I can run 60-65 MPH in 6th gear around 5-9 PSI.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:00 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jon5212
Except what I've been hearing is the Ecoboost F150 sucks in fuel mileage department if you are towing anything because it's always in boost does't make enough low end torque.

When I tow 10-15,000 pounds with my duramax I can run 60-65 MPH in 6th gear around 5-9 PSI.
I've heard the same, that the Ecoboost takes roughly the same hit V8 gas engines do when towing. It's no diesel, but low end torque on it is WAY better than any of the big gas engines. How much do you lose in your Duramax towing vs empty? Like 2mpg?
Old 02-21-2013, 11:31 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Jon5212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^ Worst I got was 16 MPG pulling a 9,000 pound vehicle on a 24 foot flatbed at 60 MPH.
Old 02-21-2013, 12:08 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TriShield
Eco this, Eco that

Enough already with the greenwashing
Ha, my thoughts exactly. Tired of seeing all this "eco" labeled stuff. It's getting annoying. Ecotec, ecoboost, ecodiesel, ecocrap... urgh



Quick Reply: Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.