Line Lock is standard on the new Mustang GT
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Line Lock is standard on the new Mustang GT
http://jalopnik.com/heres-your-first...tan-1565538531
What think you collective LSTechers? Questions regarding warranty are very much not answered yet.
What think you collective LSTechers? Questions regarding warranty are very much not answered yet.
#4
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
If you want to keep your warranty, do a burnout like a regular human being and use the brake. Self control.
If you give zero ***** about the warranty and plan to mod it pretty intensely, Line Lock your *** off.
It's really that simple. I think it's cool as ****.
If you give zero ***** about the warranty and plan to mod it pretty intensely, Line Lock your *** off.
It's really that simple. I think it's cool as ****.
#5
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How exactly would it effect the warranty?
The way I look at it, for someone that wants to burn off a set of tires, it probably saves ford from having to warrant prematurely wearing rear brakes, or prematurely wearing clutch discs because of someone that doesn't know what they're doing?
If Ford set the rev limiter on the engine with enough safety margin you should be able to burn off several sets of tires all on the rev-limiter. Or hell who knows maybe ford set the rev limiter lower when its in line lock mode?
Kudos to Ford as a cool feature that sets them a part
The way I look at it, for someone that wants to burn off a set of tires, it probably saves ford from having to warrant prematurely wearing rear brakes, or prematurely wearing clutch discs because of someone that doesn't know what they're doing?
If Ford set the rev limiter on the engine with enough safety margin you should be able to burn off several sets of tires all on the rev-limiter. Or hell who knows maybe ford set the rev limiter lower when its in line lock mode?
Kudos to Ford as a cool feature that sets them a part
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
Feature is said to be for racing purposes only
Racing voids warranty
Depends how it gets played off at dealers but I could see a number of them being ******** about it. "Oh your're car is here for a warranty check on the transmission...oh looks like you've used that line lock. You were racing. No warranty for you, stfu and get out....that will be $199.95 pay at the front counter and get this thing towed out of here"
Other than that, yes it is pretty cool.
Racing voids warranty
Depends how it gets played off at dealers but I could see a number of them being ******** about it. "Oh your're car is here for a warranty check on the transmission...oh looks like you've used that line lock. You were racing. No warranty for you, stfu and get out....that will be $199.95 pay at the front counter and get this thing towed out of here"
Other than that, yes it is pretty cool.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://jalopnik.com/use-the-2015-mus...you-1567209420
So it doesn't void the warranty unless you are racing someone on the track...but I have no idea how doing a 1/4 mile run by yourself is different than racing someone. It seems like this is their way of telling people to street race...
But what, exactly, is racing? Brian Cotter, global Mustang communications coordinator, wrote via email, "If you are using this feature in an actual race (ex. at a drag strip vs. your neighbor's Camaro) this would create a problem from a warranty standpoint."
Cotter further explained, "[T]here is nothing wrong with testing the capabilities of the Mustang in a non-race environment. You could, for instance, test your quarter-mile time on a closed-course. This would be permissible because you aren't competing against any other car OR against a predetermined time, etc."P
Cotter further explained, "[T]here is nothing wrong with testing the capabilities of the Mustang in a non-race environment. You could, for instance, test your quarter-mile time on a closed-course. This would be permissible because you aren't competing against any other car OR against a predetermined time, etc."P
#10
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In your sisters panties
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, I'd hate to be one of the new owners who has to fight a warranty claim on this like the first GTR owners. IMHO, if a feature is factory included, then IT's to be factory warrantied.
What if you have a warranty claim because the line-loc DOESN'T work?
Bottom line - If you DON'T want to warranty the use/result of using a factory "feature," then DON'T make that "feature" a factory feature at all.
Honestly, if I were in the market for a new sports car, it's this like THIS that would prevent me from buying a new Mustang.
What if you have a warranty claim because the line-loc DOESN'T work?
Bottom line - If you DON'T want to warranty the use/result of using a factory "feature," then DON'T make that "feature" a factory feature at all.
Honestly, if I were in the market for a new sports car, it's this like THIS that would prevent me from buying a new Mustang.
#11
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bunch of cry-babies in here. GM put the LS1 in the F-body and Corvettes, basically encouraging people to race...guess what? If they could prove you were racing it using that fantastic feature (the engine) they would void your warranty. This is literally no different.
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
Bunch of cry-babies in here. GM put the LS1 in the F-body and Corvettes, basically encouraging people to race...guess what? If they could prove you were racing it using that fantastic feature (the engine) they would void your warranty. This is literally no different.
#15
When I saw this a few days ago, I wondered where the warranty argument would go, having noted it in an article. Fact is, by law, using a factory installed part of any vehicle... CANNOT void the warranty... It's nonsense that too many people fall for. State and federal laws are in effect...
PS... OUTSTANDING that they've decided to add some fun!
PS... OUTSTANDING that they've decided to add some fun!
#16
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In your sisters panties
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I saw this a few days ago, I wondered where the warranty argument would go, having noted it in an article. Fact is, by law, using a factory installed part of any vehicle... CANNOT void the warranty... It's nonsense that too many people fall for. State and federal laws are in effect...
PS... OUTSTANDING that they've decided to add some fun!
PS... OUTSTANDING that they've decided to add some fun!
#17
I know they can still lie and so forth AND that they do it every single day of the week on some level. Still, someone would surely sue IF the dealer or manufacturer said, "Hey! We're glad you bought the car, but since you USED it, the warranty is void." Attorneys live for moments like that.
#18
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still think using a line lock is much easier on the drivetrain than a conventional burnout using the brakes. This is a win win for ford.
Someone that wants to do a burnout, will try it regardless, and there is undoubtedly more that can go wrong without a line lock when you have someone behind the wheel not knowing what to do.
This will save more clutches and brakes than it will wreck
Someone that wants to do a burnout, will try it regardless, and there is undoubtedly more that can go wrong without a line lock when you have someone behind the wheel not knowing what to do.
This will save more clutches and brakes than it will wreck