Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Official: 300C SRT-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2004, 11:26 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
Shinkaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Official: 300C SRT-8

Couldn't find our own 300C SRT-8 working forum to post this in...... gawd I'm a crappy moderator.


Bigger powerplant adds grunt to chunky saloon

Chrysler is to unleash an all-new, beefed-up 6.1-litre 425 bhp Hemi V8 engine in the new 2005 Chrysler 300C SRT8 next spring. Preliminary performance targets are 0-60 mph in the low five-second range and a quarter-mile time in the high 13-second range, says Chrysler.

The company adds that the naturally aspirated engine will be the highest specific output V8 engine ever offered by Chrysler, its 69.8 hp-per-litre rating exceeding even that of the legendary 1966 "Street HEMI." However, it compares poorly with engines such as the Honda VTEC housed in the S2000, which extracts 240 bhp from two litres, a specific output of 120 bhp per litre. Torque from the Hemi will be 420 lb-ft.

"Without question, the Hemi continues to play a critical role in building momentum for the Chrysler Group," said Ridenour. "With the introduction of the 6.1-litre Hemi, we're taking the legendary Hemi to a new level of benchmark performance."

Since first introducing the all-new 5.7-litre Hemi V-8 engine for the 2003 model year, Chrysler says it's sold more than 300,000 vehicles with a Hemi inside. Where Hemi is offered, it claims the take-up rate is 46 per cent.

"The Hemi continues to resonate with consumers and has essentially become a brand within our brands," said product manager Eric Ridenour. "And with MDS, our modern cylinder deactivation system, the Hemi seamlessly moves from eight cylinders to four cylinders and back. The only thing customers notice is a savings in fuel economy of up to 20 per cent."

On a product-by-product basis, the Hemi remains a popular engine choice, says Chrysler. For Dodge Durango, the take-up rate is 54 per cent. The 2005 Dodge Ram is at 46 per cent while Dodge Magnum and Chrysler 300C are at 43 per cent. Jeep Grand Cherokee's take-up rate is 29 per cent.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:35 AM
  #2  
'Bird Director
iTrader: (80)
 
y2k_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Posts: 12,824
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Well faster might sell a few more cars, but they need to delete a couple of doors too.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:40 AM
  #3  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,650
Received 1,096 Likes on 720 Posts

Default

I can envision them selling for $45K and not a lot of folks getting them.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
Shinkaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I can envision them selling for $45K and not a lot of folks getting them.
Personally I think Chrysler will find it easier to sell and appeal to themasses with a 400+hp Automatic 300C tuned for cruising than Cadillac will selling a 400+hp Manual CTS-V tuned for Corner Carving. Though, between the two the CTS-V appeals to me ar more.

Kinda remind ya of a AMG Merc vs. an M-Series BMW comparo...
Old 12-10-2004, 12:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Belton, Tx
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The tires are too skinny
Old 12-10-2004, 12:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
 
Turo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i like the car, i think it looks nice. i wouldnt buy it, but i like it
Old 12-10-2004, 01:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Just Floor It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh man! That sux, It only has 70 hp/L, whereas the S2000 has 120 hp/L
Old 12-10-2004, 03:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
Shinkaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Just Floor It
Oh man! That sux, It only has 70 hp/L, whereas the S2000 has 120 hp/L
[RICETALK]I just don't understand, My Honda CBR-600RR makes 200hp/Liter so my bike must be twice as technologically advanced as an S2000[/RICETALK]

-Adam
Old 12-10-2004, 05:36 PM
  #9  
'Bird Director
iTrader: (80)
 
y2k_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Posts: 12,824
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shinkaze
[RICETALK]I just don't understand, My Honda CBR-600RR makes 200hp/Liter so my bike must be twice as technologically advanced as an S2000[/RICETALK]

-Adam
Wow that [RICETALK] [/RICETALK] warning works wonders.....I was immediately alerted and therefore quickly diverted my eyes before I had a chance to read what it said
Old 12-21-2004, 09:23 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Mike98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's a very nice car. I like it in white especially. I've seen a couple now with the Rolls Royce grill and it looks hot IMO.
Old 12-22-2004, 12:46 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
OctaneZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Holland, IL
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

425hp/420tq and would run high 13s?
That thing must weigh ALOT! (Regular 300C = 4046lbs)
Too many lost ponies... or maybe a bunch that aren't there to begin with.
I would agree that sticker shock is gonna turn alot of folks away from this car.
Old 12-22-2004, 07:24 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
 
JackZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Houston
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I like the design of those. It would look mean as hell coming up behind someone!
Old 12-22-2004, 12:19 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Steve88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am thinking my wife may need one of these as the ole family buckster. The price will be a factor but I can't imagine that it would be a lot more than the Yukon that we have now and I am sure it would be a lot more fun to drive. Somehow a 13 sec. family car sounds a little better than an 17 or 18 sec one!
Old 12-22-2004, 01:13 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
2000 SILVERADO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been in the V6 one, slow as hell. Maybe this one is a lot faster.
Old 12-22-2004, 09:21 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
bruddah_man_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Palolo Valley HI, or Whitter SoCal
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 SILVERADO
I've been in the V6 one, slow as hell. Maybe this one is a lot faster.
Gee... you think?

225hp more than the 2.7L and 175hp more than the 3.5L. I frickin hope it's faster.



Quick Reply: Official: 300C SRT-8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.