Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

10.86 @ 127 with the only mod being drag radials

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2015, 03:37 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 10.86 @ 127 with the only mod being drag radials

Like it or not when a Hellcat can run a 10.8 by only bolting on a set of drag radials gotta give it credit.


Old 04-02-2015, 03:49 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
wes8398's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yowza! There's no doubting that these things are fast. From what I've heard through the grapevine, a lot of the vids and stories of it being less-than-spectacular are mostly due to the need for a driver mod. There's actually a funny but accurate YouTube video where a guy spells out a few of the major things that people are doing wrong when they're trying to drive these cars fast... look it up if you have a minute.
Old 04-02-2015, 04:23 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
NIKDSC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 2,600
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

I put drag radials on my brand new car. Now I have to add a cage
Old 04-02-2015, 05:31 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
actrite80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Gresham,Or
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default



For the win haha
Old 04-02-2015, 06:28 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by actrite80


For the win haha



Which is more impressive ? The Hellcat weighs 4469 lbs. with 707 HP and the Vette weighs 3558 lbs. with 650 HP . Hmm, food for thought.
Old 04-02-2015, 06:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
fruitsalad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GTman
Which is more impressive ? The Hellcat weighs 4469 lbs. with 707 HP and the Vette weighs 3558 lbs. with 650 HP . Hmm, food for thought.
So one is supposed to be impressed that Dodge can build a 2-door sports coupe that weighs in excess of 2 tons? Really slick work.
Old 04-02-2015, 07:37 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
4doortypels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: lilburn GA
Posts: 422
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

707 hp under rated? How quick can the helcat get thru gears... 8 gears you can really play with ratios... they are stout no matter what way you cut it.
Old 04-02-2015, 09:07 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
rand49er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Lyon, MI
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NIKDSC5
I put drag radials on my brand new car. Now I have to add a cage
Ha ha!
Old 04-02-2015, 10:09 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NIKDSC5
I put drag radials on my brand new car. Now I have to add a cage
Pretty sure the rules were amended for new cars for this very reason. I believe they can now go 10.0 before a roll bar is needed.
Old 04-03-2015, 06:33 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fruitsalad
So one is supposed to be impressed that Dodge can build a 2-door sports coupe that weighs in excess of 2 tons? Really slick work.




Did you manage to catch this vid of the Hellcat vs Vette from a roll.

Old 04-03-2015, 06:56 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
NIKDSC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 2,600
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
Pretty sure the rules were amended for new cars for this very reason. I believe they can now go 10.0 before a roll bar is needed.

You know, I was wondering that. Because I hadn't seen people getting booted lately.

Thanks! Good to know if my puny V1 ever gets to the 10's I won't have to add weight
To the above video with the zo6, it clearly needs a driver mod. I also love how they termed it annihilate that race should be very even with the whole power to weight aspect. It's good to see that with some traction given to both cars, from a dig the vette wins, and I'd bet the hellcat never catches it. Aerodynamics and all. What is the rated top speed of both cars?

Last edited by NIKDSC5; 04-03-2015 at 07:04 AM.
Old 04-03-2015, 10:25 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
rand49er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Lyon, MI
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NIKDSC5
... it clearly needs a driver mod ...
Are you suggesting that he join Weight Watchers because just slamming his foot to the floor can't be too difficult.

You're right about the word "annihilate." Doesn't quite work here.
Old 04-03-2015, 12:15 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NIKDSC5
that race should be very even with the whole power to weight aspect. What is the rated top speed of both cars?



With the Vette having 650 HP and weighing in at 3558 ( according to Car & Driver mag ) and with the Hellcat having only 57 more HP at 707 and weighing 4469 that puts the weight difference at a little over 900 lbs. in favor of Vette so not sure that the race should be " very even with the whole power to weight aspect " as you have suggested.

As for top speed the Hellcat's is reported to be 199 MPH ( 204 mph for the Charger ) while the Vette's is only 186 mph( hard to believe that's not a typo mistake from Chevrolet ).
Old 04-03-2015, 12:39 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
NIKDSC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 2,600
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

911 pounds for 57 HP is a close race. 6.32 lbs per HP in the dodge, 5.47 in the vette. Lot of variables here, drivetrain loss (standard v auto) aerodynamic wind resistance etc etc. Lets not forget the same torque figure in both cars* My point was the hell cat may very well win, but not by much.

The top speed issue as I understand it is the rear wing on the vette. Apparently creates a **** load of drag (kinda counter my previous argument there). The ZR1 did 205 with 630 so no reason why the zo6 cannot do the same with aerodynamic hindrances removed.

As for the driver mod thats easy. Look at those 1/4 mile times. The guy driving that vette is damn near a pro at the strip. Other novice drivers in that car modded and tuned are on youtube hitting 11 flat area. Look at the C6 Z, people hit 10.8 in that stock. You would think it is as easy as mashing the gas, but apparently it is not.

I do look forward to more Z/hellcat stock for stock showing up in the future.

Car and driver @ road Atlanta: Vette :1:29 Hellcat (can't seem to find it) For the more than straight line people.
Old 04-03-2015, 01:07 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
fruitsalad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GTman
As for top speed the Hellcat's is reported to be 199 MPH ( 204 mph for the Charger ) while the Vette's is only 186 mph( hard to believe that's not a typo mistake from Chevrolet ).
Not hard to believe you have no clue what aero is.

Also, now this is what I call impressive:

All 707 conspiring to get it down to a blistering 12.7 ET! Excuses inbound!
Old 04-03-2015, 01:34 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fruitsalad
Not hard to believe you have no clue what aero is.

Also, now this is what I call impressive:
Hellcat Charger Hits Sacramento Raceway - YouTube

All 707 conspiring to get it down to a blistering 12.7 ET! Excuses inbound!


Just as you have no clue when it comes to a 900+ weight advantage.
Old 04-03-2015, 02:58 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
fruitsalad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GTman
Just as you have no clue when it comes to a 900+ weight advantage.
How flawed of you.
Old 04-03-2015, 03:06 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fruitsalad
How flawed of you.

How **** of you to notice !
Old 04-05-2015, 08:40 PM
  #19  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 406
Received 218 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Dodge has had some badass cars come out. I mean when a muscle car can outrun GM's top of the line vette in a roll race you are doing something right. And a sedan that can run tens off the showroom floor for sub 60k is amazing. And fruitsalad I guess spinning halfway down the track don't mean much to you. I got my old 392 to run a 12.47 @ 114 mph.
Old 04-06-2015, 06:36 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
Dodge has had some badass cars come out. I mean when a muscle car can outrun GM's top of the line vette in a roll race you are doing something right. And a sedan that can run tens off the showroom floor for sub 60k is amazing. And fruitsalad I guess spinning halfway down the track don't mean much to you. I got my old 392 to run a 12.47 @ 114 mph.



IMO, running a 12.47 @ 114mph normally aspirated in a heavy car like a Mopar is pretty good number.

Last edited by GTman; 04-06-2015 at 06:41 PM.


Quick Reply: 10.86 @ 127 with the only mod being drag radials



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.