Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Header size question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2011, 04:51 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Header size question?

Looking to buy headers for my car. I'm sure y'all have seen my post about the OBX headers. Quick question... Are you guys running 1-3/4 or 1-7/8 headers??

What kind of power is the 1-3/4 good to? I don't want to have to buy headers twice. Sooner or later, it will be a minimum heads/cam bolt-on car so prob in the 450rwhp range. From what I understand, at 500hp, the 1-3/4 become restrictive. Should I run 1-7/8 incase I add nitrous or get mod crazy or should the 1-3/4 be fine?
Old 06-17-2011, 05:16 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The 1 7/8 should make equal low & mid-range torque and more horsepower even on a stock motor. Assuming the cost is about the same, the only advantage of 1 3/4 headers is they have fewer clearance issues in the engine compartment.

Based on standard engineering gas flow formulas a 1 7/8 piping system will flow 19.5% more than a 1 3/4 piping system of the same design and length. So the difference is not huge.
Old 06-17-2011, 08:19 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the info man! Just wonder why majority of guys seem to run the 1-3/4 setup then? Price is almost the exact same (within $30) and if the 1-7/8 flows better and makes the same torque but more horsepower on the high end, it seems foolish to buy the 1-3/4 over the 1-7/8 option.

My thinking is this though...

Even though they both go to a 3" collector, the fact that the rest of the exhaust is only 2.5" means they would both flow the same in the end anyway unless you made the entire exhaust 3"... right? At that point, it seems like the 1-7/8 would actually have a benefit to it but until then, i couldn't see the slightly larger size being an advantage unless the rest of the exhaust could keep up with it.

Maybe im wrong but thats just my thinking.
Old 06-17-2011, 08:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NeverSatisfied02
Thanks for the info man! Just wonder why majority of guys seem to run the 1-3/4 setup then? Price is almost the exact same (within $30) and if the 1-7/8 flows better and makes the same torque but more horsepower on the high end, it seems foolish to buy the 1-3/4 over the 1-7/8 option.

My thinking is this though...

Even though they both go to a 3" collector, the fact that the rest of the exhaust is only 2.5" means they would both flow the same in the end anyway unless you made the entire exhaust 3"... right? At that point, it seems like the 1-7/8 would actually have a benefit to it but until then, i couldn't see the slightly larger size being an advantage unless the rest of the exhaust could keep up with it.

Maybe im wrong but thats just my thinking.
The exhaust gases leave the engine at very high temperatures become cooler the as they travel farther away from the engine. As the gases cool they also contract volumetrically and therefore, take up less space. Because of this, reductions in pipe size become less critical to flow rates farther downstream. Because the exhaust will eventually run into smaller diameter piping it is even more important to maximize the flow closer to the engine.

Last edited by Darkman; 06-17-2011 at 08:52 PM.
Old 06-17-2011, 09:05 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh I see. Well thanks for breaking it down for me. Makes sense now!

So is 1-3/4 plenty enough up to a certain hp? Like say 500rwhp? I know 1-3/4 is still a big upgrade from factory.
Old 06-17-2011, 09:26 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NeverSatisfied02
Oh I see. Well thanks for breaking it down for me. Makes sense now!

So is 1-3/4 plenty enough up to a certain hp? Like say 500rwhp? I know 1-3/4 is still a big upgrade from factory.
There is not a huge different between the two sizes particularly with fewer mods.

The clearance issues with the larger headers can be important if the car is a daily driver since those clearance issues can translate into melted wires, connectors, starters, and engine mounts. You also have do some bending to install the larger size in the V (steering column). Overall in the V, the larger size may not be the best choice unless you are going big (maggies, heads, big cams and such), or building a track oriented car.

Your call.
Old 06-17-2011, 09:49 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I see. Well mine is a daily and I plan to do a nice heads/cam combo and that's about it. Maybe a little laughing gas later but nothing too huge. I think 1-3/4 might be my best bet to avoid clearance issues.
Old 06-18-2011, 01:43 AM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
siggyfreud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 344
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The smaller pipe size downstream, as the gasses contract, should theoretically help keep exhaust velocity up as well.

Old 06-18-2011, 01:52 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
RADEoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Harrison City, PA
Posts: 1,695
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I never knew obx made 1 3/4.
Old 06-18-2011, 02:20 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont know if they do but kooks does.
Old 06-18-2011, 02:44 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
babrown18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah I had the same issue. On kooks website they said that the 1-7/8 header is for extreme use... ie heads/cam/maggie etc.. if that's ur plan I think the 1-7/8 will be a good fit. I personally got 1-3/4 kooks headers because I only plan to cam it only.. but like the guys said earlier, its your call.
Old 06-18-2011, 07:37 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
scatillac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ruckerville, Ky
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
The clearance issues with the larger headers can be important if the car is a daily driver since those clearance issues can translate into melted wires, connectors, starters, and engine mounts. You also have do some bending to install the larger size in the V (steering column).
I have 1 7/8" Kooks (coated) and have encountered none of these issues. I did, however fabricate some harness retainers and use DEI's insulating products where the proximity the header tube (and possibility of contact) warranted.

Also, when installing headers of any size, a starter shield/insulator should always be used.
Old 06-18-2011, 07:40 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
SimplistikTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Currently El Paso, TX
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So if I planned on doing just a Maggie on the stock heads and cam I'd be good with 1 3/4?
Old 06-18-2011, 12:11 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
NeverSatisfied02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hope 1-3/4 will be enough for a nice heads/cam setup. Doubt I'll be supercharging mine.
Old 06-20-2011, 04:20 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
LS2duc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default header diameter

I was under the impression (not sure why) that 1 3/4 were generally for motors that would not be supercharged, while the wider diamters were more appropriate for forced induction systems. Someone told me, acutually more than one person told me this. Great thing about being newbie, research can be much more anecdotal. When does newbieism cease? When does responsibility commence? I listened to all you forum folks and freaks and a few salesmen and my V runs like the MF'ing space shuttle! Yes-1 7/8 pipes.



Quick Reply: Header size question?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.