ctsv intake
#41
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess I don't agree, certainly our intake isn't optimal but I don't see how it's effecting the curve. The restriction wouldn't be at a particular RPM but at a particular airflow. Your 418 with the larger cam is going to hit this limit even earlier than your friends and if it were truly an issue you would think you would peak even earlier?
#42
I guess I don't agree, certainly our intake isn't optimal but I don't see how it's effecting the curve. The restriction wouldn't be at a particular RPM but at a particular airflow. Your 418 with the larger cam is going to hit this limit even earlier than your friends and if it were truly an issue you would think you would peak even earlier?
#43
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#44
that's true... its just really weird... is it just a coincidence that 3 completely different sized motors with completely different heads and cams and exhausts would all do the same thing up top? seems really weird to me... there has to be some factor somewhere tying those results together
#45
Okay guys ive modified the volant box and decided to run my 05 K and N intake tube. I pulled the tb spacer to get a little more room and run a little longer coupler on the throttle body. So first off took some foil tape and covered the inside of the air box where the maf bolts to and used 2 tube of black plastic weld to seal that location. After drying I sanded it down. Did a mock up to see where my tubing would go. Sharpie a hole and cut it out with an extra .25 of an inch for the coupler to sit. The maf I have is a modified (ported screen removed and plastic around the filiment). Installed the elbow box and couplers. Notched out a small area where the maf cable can enter and hooked it all up. I used a stainless steel spectre air filter (had it laying around from an old turbo integra). The box is firm (will work on properly mounting soon) the tubing clears my radiator and the power steering pulley. I ran the car after all was said and done. The car feels like it pulls harder to red line. Its tapering off around 6700 by feel. Tuner said before I was 28*s in the midrange and pulling down to 24* by redline. Ill run my friends car to see if any difference was made. He is always 1/2 a car back. Ill see if the tuner can get my timing back. And return to the dyno and see what it does. Unfortunately the last place to dyno was hunters which is shut down. So a comparison wont be able to be made... and ive installed an 8.8 with 3.55 since
#46
From what I can tell... here are intake options for V1.
Stock: intake tube highly restrictive, resonance (accordian ridges) tubing. High flow box...
LINGENFELTER: replaces stock box with heat shield... keeps restrictive intake pipe. Adds k&n cone style filter
K&N: nice large smooth intake pipe mates to high flow cone style filter with same heat shield as lingenfelter. No provisions for fresh air.
Volant: nice plastic box with provisions for cool air from the front grill. The box has an area that pertrudes beside the radiator for air from the front grille, and to the inner fender liner. Nicely enclosed piece. Probably the best engineered piece. Pitfall is the beautifully molded piece that has a sharp turn into the throttle body. The tube is round where it mounts into the box, then is pinched into several oblongs reopens to a nice round piece right at the throttle body. Its a hard 90* turn.
My suggestion... DIY 90* silicone coupler, abs plastic 3.5 in piece to factory or the garbage can mod.
Anyone able to upload pics... I can email them. They wont upload to my photo bucket
Stock: intake tube highly restrictive, resonance (accordian ridges) tubing. High flow box...
LINGENFELTER: replaces stock box with heat shield... keeps restrictive intake pipe. Adds k&n cone style filter
K&N: nice large smooth intake pipe mates to high flow cone style filter with same heat shield as lingenfelter. No provisions for fresh air.
Volant: nice plastic box with provisions for cool air from the front grill. The box has an area that pertrudes beside the radiator for air from the front grille, and to the inner fender liner. Nicely enclosed piece. Probably the best engineered piece. Pitfall is the beautifully molded piece that has a sharp turn into the throttle body. The tube is round where it mounts into the box, then is pinched into several oblongs reopens to a nice round piece right at the throttle body. Its a hard 90* turn.
My suggestion... DIY 90* silicone coupler, abs plastic 3.5 in piece to factory or the garbage can mod.
Anyone able to upload pics... I can email them. They wont upload to my photo bucket
#47
i will measure the spectre i have just for info sake. it came on the car. i started reading about tsp and lpe 100mm maf last night. got me thinking about a 90deg elbow and a 4" intake pjpe and use the spectre heat shield existing. like u guys said though, thats tight through there. dang shame we cant do the vette style two cone filter intake and use a box under it to keep heat off yet get air from grill
#48
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Been there and thought of them all...
I dont want to lose the MAF so my options are lessened.
OTRCAI will NEVER be feasible on a small budget, you have to do extensive chassis alterations
3.5" tube, samco 90 degree elbow and LPE CAI is the best combo with potential till about 450rwhp.
4" tube with samco 90 degree elbow and LPE CAI is the ultimate combo for more peak HP with slight loss of tq at bottom end. Also a hole should be made in the bottom of the filter box for more air.
I have a 6" velocity stack feeding into a 6" long 102mm MAF with 45 elbow then 102mm intake tube to 90 elbow straight into the engine.
As i have louvers right above the air filter i do not need to drill any holes.
AFE make the best sand resistant filters
followed by AEM synthetic
followed by KN
AFE make powercore paper filters but max power is 380rwhp, after which you will start to suffocate the engine.
My AFE filter is of a custom build that is short wide and has top cone filter as well..This way i maximize my filtration area with minimal dust introduction.
The elbow is the most important, thus the reason i am using samco. It has the least restrictive that is basically a curved straight tube. Most other elbows have an edge inside causing turbulence and ultimately loss of potential power...Their 4-ply is great for you all, though i am using 102mm 5-ply as so not to collapse under high suction loads...
I dont want to lose the MAF so my options are lessened.
OTRCAI will NEVER be feasible on a small budget, you have to do extensive chassis alterations
3.5" tube, samco 90 degree elbow and LPE CAI is the best combo with potential till about 450rwhp.
4" tube with samco 90 degree elbow and LPE CAI is the ultimate combo for more peak HP with slight loss of tq at bottom end. Also a hole should be made in the bottom of the filter box for more air.
I have a 6" velocity stack feeding into a 6" long 102mm MAF with 45 elbow then 102mm intake tube to 90 elbow straight into the engine.
As i have louvers right above the air filter i do not need to drill any holes.
AFE make the best sand resistant filters
followed by AEM synthetic
followed by KN
AFE make powercore paper filters but max power is 380rwhp, after which you will start to suffocate the engine.
My AFE filter is of a custom build that is short wide and has top cone filter as well..This way i maximize my filtration area with minimal dust introduction.
The elbow is the most important, thus the reason i am using samco. It has the least restrictive that is basically a curved straight tube. Most other elbows have an edge inside causing turbulence and ultimately loss of potential power...Their 4-ply is great for you all, though i am using 102mm 5-ply as so not to collapse under high suction loads...
#52
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
narrow drivers side headlight, drill hole in radiator support, route fresh air into airbox, go from there.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/cadillac-...v1-bumper.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/cadillac-...v1-bumper.html
#54
Yea don't waste your time doing what I did with the headlights. Its way to much work if you just want a little more air into the intake. I did it for future turbos.
Also; relocating the battery is easy, but relocating the fuse box to the battery location...that's a little more work. I'm currently doing that now, and I need to extend pretty much every wire going to the drivers side of the car. Again, not worth it for just intake tube.
Just remove the drivers side headlight completely!! It'll get plenty of air at that point lol
Also; relocating the battery is easy, but relocating the fuse box to the battery location...that's a little more work. I'm currently doing that now, and I need to extend pretty much every wire going to the drivers side of the car. Again, not worth it for just intake tube.
Just remove the drivers side headlight completely!! It'll get plenty of air at that point lol
#56
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Its about temperature, not volume.
http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...-intake-3.html
For a true Cold Air Induction on this platform, are there any better ideas floating around? The underhood temps on this car are savage and I live in the south, so I think pursuing this makes sense, especially sense I already plan on having the bumper off the car and buying a spare set of headlights to have polished and ready to go. Sectioning the headlight could be done while watching Breaking Bad reruns...my kind of mod.
http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...-intake-3.html
For a true Cold Air Induction on this platform, are there any better ideas floating around? The underhood temps on this car are savage and I live in the south, so I think pursuing this makes sense, especially sense I already plan on having the bumper off the car and buying a spare set of headlights to have polished and ready to go. Sectioning the headlight could be done while watching Breaking Bad reruns...my kind of mod.
Last edited by ls1247; 09-25-2014 at 09:04 AM.
#59
my tuner did some pulls with my car on the street and could not see a restriction from what he could tell... Although he did say the resolution doing it that way was not the best and he preferred to do it with other sensors on the dyno to be sure...But at least from that i don't think its as big of a prob as i originally thought
The following users liked this post:
ShakeDownZ28 (12-20-2023)