Ok I searched, but wanted your opinions. - LS1TECH

Log In 


Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

Ok I searched, but wanted your opinions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2012, 10:01 PM   #1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
Chris05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East of the east bay CA
Posts: 884
Default Ok I searched, but wanted your opinions.

I have a 1972 Chevelle with a LQ9, patriot 226 cam, turbo 400. I'm planning to run a single plane of some sort, long tubes and a 3400-3500 stall, Gears are 4.10s. I have a 750 Holley vac secondary carb from the last engine, should I reuse this carb or should I step up to a bigger carb or another 750 with mechanical secondaries??? I plan on swapping the heads out later to a set of SDPC cnc'd 243s.
Chris05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 11:08 PM   #2
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
Chris05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East of the east bay CA
Posts: 884
Default

I know it takes time to get responses. 71 views later, I figured I'd have a couple...
Chris05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 05:22 AM   #3
On The Tree
 
richard david's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 165
Default

If your just making a cruiser that will work but if your wanting to make some power go with a mechanical.750 or 850.. I ran a 75010 vac sec. On mine and could only get 119mph out of it went to 850 and picked up to 124 with my old lq4.
richard david is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 05:24 AM   #4
On The Tree
 
richard david's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 165
Default

That was supposed to say 750 vac.secondary
richard david is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 06:43 AM   #5
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

I take it you are setting this up for the track? You will be moving a good bit of air with that cam and ported heads. I'm sure it could use the extra CFM up top so I would think at least an 850 would be a better choice. I would be tempted to run what I had for now and upgrade later.

Mechanical vs. vac secondary, I don't know what to tell you. Some guys on here say never run a vac secondary cause they cost HP up top. Holley only recommends them for light weight, low gear cars with manual transmissions.
Pop N Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 08:04 AM   #6
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 10,980
Default

The 750 will work, but a mechanical will get the max air to the engine, and larger cfm is a plus as stated.
ZONES89RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 09:40 AM   #7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
Chris05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East of the east bay CA
Posts: 884
Default

Thank you guys.
Chris05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:12 AM   #8
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (15)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,802
Default

I would not run a vacuum secondary carburetor with a high stall converter over 2500.
speedtigger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 11:59 AM   #9
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (37)
 
MikeFSKSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 799
Default

If you need, I have killer deals on Proform/Quickfuel Carbs in stock
MikeFSKSpeed is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.