Timing and fuel Question
#1
Timing and fuel Question
I need some input on timing. I have a 383 ls1, 12.5-13.0CR, lunati forged RA, AI custom grind, .626/.626 270/278 (239/249@.050) 112 lsa, 2.3 Advances, AI ported/milled (58cc) 243s, super victor, holley hp 850 E85 carb, on E85.
so, to start off, I used to the preset #1 timing curve, and the car fired right up. idles/revs good. I was giving advice from 2 different people, both have been proven to know their stuff. anywho, I tried both the timing curves. 0*@0rpm, 5*@1k, 10*@2k, 15*@3k-redline. the other, 2*@0rpm, 7*@1k, 15*@2k, 19*@2400, 22*@3k-redline. both curves made my car run like junk. I re-programmed #1 curve and the engine runs good again. But on the start up of first rev, it pops, then revs great. not all the time. power valve? it has not backfired at all through the carb or headers. Can someone point me in the right direction on the timing I should be running? please. thanx!
Also, what micron rating are you guys running on your systems? and where are you mounting them? (before pump, after pump, after reg,)
so, to start off, I used to the preset #1 timing curve, and the car fired right up. idles/revs good. I was giving advice from 2 different people, both have been proven to know their stuff. anywho, I tried both the timing curves. 0*@0rpm, 5*@1k, 10*@2k, 15*@3k-redline. the other, 2*@0rpm, 7*@1k, 15*@2k, 19*@2400, 22*@3k-redline. both curves made my car run like junk. I re-programmed #1 curve and the engine runs good again. But on the start up of first rev, it pops, then revs great. not all the time. power valve? it has not backfired at all through the carb or headers. Can someone point me in the right direction on the timing I should be running? please. thanx!
Also, what micron rating are you guys running on your systems? and where are you mounting them? (before pump, after pump, after reg,)
#3
The compression you have and those heads. IMO you should be running a 950 cfm carb. Unless you have a bad *** 850 that flows like a 950. I think you are leaving some on the table.
#4
With E85 you should have a 100 micron before the pump and a 40 micron after.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
ill have to give that timing a shot. It seems like it likes more timing. what do you recommend as for pulling timing on the bottle? I really don't know how to go about doing that as well.
Thanks guys for all the feed back!!
#11
Check out any good fuel pump site like Aeromotive or Magna Fuel. With gas you should have a 100 before and a 10 after. I run a A3000 Aeromotive. The 100 is a modular canister unit that attaches to the pump itself.
#12
Which is why I asked you about your earlier suggestion to run a 40 micron after the pump. 10 is what I have always read. Thought maybe there was something special about E85 that required a coarser filter.
#13
A little bit off topic, but surely the lobe ramp on your cam could not be this aggressive?
Especially if going by these numbers, the exhaust lobe is faster off the seat than the intake lobe??
I would assume you've misquoted the cam specs entirely.
Especially if going by these numbers, the exhaust lobe is faster off the seat than the intake lobe??
I would assume you've misquoted the cam specs entirely.
#15
Yes the 40 micron is for E85 only. And yes it is more coarse. Has less of a chance of gumming up do to the thicker fuel. Sorry my bad.
#16
#17
I doubt it. I had the cam specd out from AI for me. i told them all my specs, and what i wanted out of the car. Although, this was specd for my previous setup, which was a Direct port FAST 90/NW 90. I already had the cam when i swapped top ends, but i contacted them and asked them if i needed to change my cam. they said as long as i am still on spray, it will work good. he said if i was going n/a then he would recommend something on a 109 lsa
#18
Hmmm, still think the advertised numbers must be somewhere in the @ .015" - .020" lift range.
If those numbers were at typical adv. spec of .006" lift, your valvetrain noise would be excessive, that's for sure. Would doubt it to be possible to run such an aggressive ramp rate with hyd roller, valvetrain life would be very short I'd imagine.
If those numbers were at typical adv. spec of .006" lift, your valvetrain noise would be excessive, that's for sure. Would doubt it to be possible to run such an aggressive ramp rate with hyd roller, valvetrain life would be very short I'd imagine.
#19
I didn't actually measure with a degree wheel but you make me want to. the cam is aggressive, but valvetrain noise is no where to be heard. 1. The engine is super loud with open headers, 2. I used a pushrod length checker, and with the lifter preload, 7.4 pushrods are a perfect fit. you can hear the motor here...