possible to use an LT1 T56 on an LS engine?
#1
possible to use an LT1 T56 on an LS engine?
I have a 65 cutlass that I have swapped an LT1 T56 into. It runs great but I am considering upgrading to an LS engine in the future and want to keep my T56. I have read that there are crank spacers available to work with gen I transmissions, does this mean that I could space out the flywheel and use my LT1 parts? Or would I need to use the spacer and an LS version flywheel/clutch/bellhousing with the LT1 trans? I am hoping this is possible since I have a few more LT1 T56 transmissions for future use and it would be easier to use them than try to find LS versions of the T56.
#4
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
As far as i know. I've never personally compared them but from everything ive read its the wrong length. See when you bolt an SBC transmission to an LS1 you need to use a spacer for the torque converter. This work fine. I dont see you being able to space a flywheel. And you can space the pressure plate or it wont work. I would just say no.
#5
ok, just found some pics on site where someone changed the input shaft to an LS1 style, looks like it was possible to do this by taking the front of the trans off only and not having to tear it all apart. If this is the case then it is not too big a deal, I will look into it.
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, just found some pics on site where someone changed the input shaft to an LS1 style, looks like it was possible to do this by taking the front of the trans off only and not having to tear it all apart. If this is the case then it is not too big a deal, I will look into it.
#7
Yes it is possible, I am in the middle of a conversion. Not to an LS motor, but I have to change to the LS input shaft. As long as your LT T56 trans is not a 93'/ early 94' F body and you pull the front cover to verify that you don't have a 29 tooth input shaft an LS1 input will fit directly in and an LS1 bellhousing/slave cylinder will mate right up ( all the T56's use the same bell to trans bolt pattern, but the bell to engine patterns and depths are different...hence the longer LS input shaft. The base trans are all interchangeable, though the Vipers have a bigger input/output shaft, and the early 93'/94' F bodies use a different gear set that is not interchangeable with the LS and later LT input shafts.
Trending Topics
#8
Sell that t56 and buy an LS version. The LT type trans should be worth more since they made so few of them and they bolt up to the first get SBC stuff. Can't believe you couldn't make a trade somewhere and end up dollars ahead. Although I know dealing in used transmission is always a risk. Something about a failing trans can make people less than honest.
#9
Sell that t56 and buy an LS version. The LT type trans should be worth more since they made so few of them and they bolt up to the first get SBC stuff. Can't believe you couldn't make a trade somewhere and end up dollars ahead. Although I know dealing in used transmission is always a risk. Something about a failing trans can make people less than honest.
As for already having the LT trans, I would just buy a new input and locate a Ls bellhousing. Should be pretty simple and cost effective in your situation.
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
You are missing some info there crookedbowtie..
Internally the 1994-1997 LT1 Trannies are the same. The dfifferences are the Input Shaft, and the Front Cover Plate.
The difference in the Front Plates are the LT1 one has the slot for the Fork, and the LS1 one has the 2 slots for the Slave Cyl, and the spot in the Center of it around the Input Shaft to bolt the Slave to.
The LT1 Front Plate will not work with a LS1 setup, and a LS1 Front Plate will not with with a LT1/SBC setup.
A few people have switched the Input Shafts and the Front Plates to get what they need, but that isn't necessarily good because the Bearings have to be shimmed correctly.
I would look for an LS1 Transmission.
Internally the 1994-1997 LT1 Trannies are the same. The dfifferences are the Input Shaft, and the Front Cover Plate.
The difference in the Front Plates are the LT1 one has the slot for the Fork, and the LS1 one has the 2 slots for the Slave Cyl, and the spot in the Center of it around the Input Shaft to bolt the Slave to.
The LT1 Front Plate will not work with a LS1 setup, and a LS1 Front Plate will not with with a LT1/SBC setup.
A few people have switched the Input Shafts and the Front Plates to get what they need, but that isn't necessarily good because the Bearings have to be shimmed correctly.
I would look for an LS1 Transmission.
#11
You are missing some info there crookedbowtie..
Internally the 1994-1997 LT1 Trannies are the same. The dfifferences are the Input Shaft, and the Front Cover Plate.
The difference in the Front Plates are the LT1 one has the slot for the Fork, and the LS1 one has the 2 slots for the Slave Cyl, and the spot in the Center of it around the Input Shaft to bolt the Slave to.
The LT1 Front Plate will not work with a LS1 setup, and a LS1 Front Plate will not with with a LT1/SBC setup.
A few people have switched the Input Shafts and the Front Plates to get what they need, but that isn't necessarily good because the Bearings have to be shimmed correctly.
I would look for an LS1 Transmission.
Internally the 1994-1997 LT1 Trannies are the same. The dfifferences are the Input Shaft, and the Front Cover Plate.
The difference in the Front Plates are the LT1 one has the slot for the Fork, and the LS1 one has the 2 slots for the Slave Cyl, and the spot in the Center of it around the Input Shaft to bolt the Slave to.
The LT1 Front Plate will not work with a LS1 setup, and a LS1 Front Plate will not with with a LT1/SBC setup.
A few people have switched the Input Shafts and the Front Plates to get what they need, but that isn't necessarily good because the Bearings have to be shimmed correctly.
I would look for an LS1 Transmission.
#12
lt-1 T-56 and a Pontiac 400
Hi,
It looks like a lt-1 t-56 on a ponti 400 is possible, but hopefully someone can set me straight.
I don't believe a pull type flywheel is available for ponti engines, so manual linkage using a stock ponti flywheel could be used with a 26 tooth clutch.
I could use a stock bellshousing but would need an adapter: t-56 to old bellhousing.
Does it look like I would need an ls-1 input shaft - or is there an extended input shaft bearing somewhere?
Thank you for any help, pontiac always makes things hard. (The lt-1 t-56 is new, and has been sitting on the shelf for 9 years)
Dan
It looks like a lt-1 t-56 on a ponti 400 is possible, but hopefully someone can set me straight.
I don't believe a pull type flywheel is available for ponti engines, so manual linkage using a stock ponti flywheel could be used with a 26 tooth clutch.
I could use a stock bellshousing but would need an adapter: t-56 to old bellhousing.
Does it look like I would need an ls-1 input shaft - or is there an extended input shaft bearing somewhere?
Thank you for any help, pontiac always makes things hard. (The lt-1 t-56 is new, and has been sitting on the shelf for 9 years)
Dan