Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Second time @ the track for 5.3L 96' S10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2009, 11:48 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
orange88ls1s-dime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 423
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default Second time @ the track for 5.3L 96' S10

well just got home from friday night test and tune at St. Thomas Dragway
made 5 runs last week went 14.19 @ 96 mph this week i put a shift kit in and went 14.07@ 96 mph next week i just might have to run in the 13s. heres hoping
Old 09-05-2009, 11:07 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (11)
 
VIPERKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice is it a stock 5.3 im dropping in a 5.3 with ported heads and ms4 cam in my 99 s10
Old 09-06-2009, 08:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
orange88ls1s-dime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 423
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

yup bone stock except for carb conversion and s10 headers
Old 09-08-2009, 01:12 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
2XR95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much does the truck weigh? What do you have tranny wise? I would think even a stock 5.3 would be be low 13's in a light little s10?
Old 09-08-2009, 07:35 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
orange88ls1s-dime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 423
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

nope before i even thought of doing this project i did some figuring and 14.00 is wat i came up with for a stock 5.3 auto in the 2900lbs s10 and after running the truck several times the only way im gonna go faster is to add more power jetting is spot on timing is where it wants to be no spinning its as good as it is gonna get with this setup.
now i had trans problems this weekend while racing street class in Grand Bend so ive got some tricks up my sleeve when i pull the trans out i might as well yank the motor too and mess with it. ill post this weekends timeslips after i run on friday night maybe 13s
Old 09-08-2009, 09:24 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Awesome 14.00 from a stock motor is wicked. I heard that the zo6 cam makes a big hp difference
Old 09-08-2009, 10:38 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
2XR95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

long tube or shorty headers?
Old 09-08-2009, 10:39 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
MeanYellowZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

5.3s aren't down much in power from the 5.7 LS1, which has run 12.9 stock many times in a 3400lb f-body. I would expect much faster in a 2900lb S-10 also. My LT1 98 S-10 ran 12.89 with a stock 140k mile LT1 and then 12.46 with a small comp cam, which probably put the power equal to an LS1. A local guy has an S10 here with a junkyard 5.3 and a decent cam ONLY and it runs 11.7. The truck weighs right at 3000, it was weighed yesterday.
Old 09-08-2009, 10:58 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
2XR95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thats exactly why i'm asking this Randy, something doesn't seem right here... I'm thinking the carb jetting and such is off or something...
Old 09-08-2009, 12:01 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm with the guys above thinking it should have more in it. My buddy has a 68 Chevy C10 that we put a 5.3L into and it runs 14.40 on street tires and has gotta weigh alot more than a little S10. BTW his times were at St Thomas too.
Old 09-08-2009, 12:34 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (18)
 
zx9rgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wetumpka, AL
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

late model s-10s weigh a lot. My 98 weighs 3840 with a lot of weight taken out with a 6.0.
Old 09-08-2009, 01:06 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
LS1GMCTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It would probably run a full second faster, if it was installed with its factory fuel injection system.
Old 09-08-2009, 01:06 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Here is a rundown of the ones I have done.

1997 ext. cab @3450lbs race weight. L99 5.3l bone stock shortie headers, 13.3@103.5

1998 reg cab 6 sp. 3350lbs race weight. Alum. 5.3l with ls6 cam and intake stock manifolds. 13.00@108.xx

2003 2wd 2dr blazer, 3850lbs race weight. Iron 5.3l bone stock with ls1 car intake and camaro manifolds. 13.7@99.

I think that is it off the top of my head. Maybe you have a bad DA that you are running in too. We race in with a 2000ft DA most of the time.

BTW, I tuned all three of these too. I just got done with a 2003 ext. cab cam only 5.3l I will give that a shot this Friday with the 205/65's on it.

Last edited by hellbents10; 09-08-2009 at 01:14 PM.
Old 09-08-2009, 01:31 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
 
pdsq98gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MeanYellowZ
5.3s aren't down much in power from the 5.7 LS1, which has run 12.9 stock many times in a 3400lb f-body. I would expect much faster in a 2900lb S-10 also. My LT1 98 S-10 ran 12.89 with a stock 140k mile LT1 and then 12.46 with a small comp cam, which probably put the power equal to an LS1. A local guy has an S10 here with a junkyard 5.3 and a decent cam ONLY and it runs 11.7. The truck weighs right at 3000, it was weighed yesterday.
I disagree. An LS1 puts down about 315 to the tires stock, where a 5.3 puts down about 235 rwhp. That's quite a difference. Stick a different cam in that 5.3 and it will be a different animal.
Old 09-08-2009, 01:47 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
MeanYellowZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pdsq98gt
I disagree. An LS1 puts down about 315 to the tires stock, where a 5.3 puts down about 235 rwhp. That's quite a difference. Stick a different cam in that 5.3 and it will be a different animal.

There have been a handful of dynos between 5.7 and 5.3 gen III engines and when everything is equal (car intake, etc) the difference in power is usually minimal, around 15-20 horse. This truck has a carb'd intake which should flow similiar to an LS1/ LS6 intake, headers and I would assume free flowing exhaust and minimal accessories/ emissions. I have swapped in more than enough 5.3s and when setup right they make very similiar power to a 5.7
Old 09-08-2009, 01:53 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If the numbers are off, I would postulate its the single plane intake with a carb causing it. Low stall might worsen the problem. I'm curious what the 60' is
Old 09-08-2009, 07:57 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Monza355's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ambridge PA
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it should be a little faster. What controller are you using? What's the timing set at? What tires and are there any traction bars, gearing, etc?

I ran my 2900 lb Monza with a 98 F-body LS1 completely stock and went 12.30's at 108. I never had it dynoed.

Good luck!
Old 09-09-2009, 05:44 PM
  #18  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
orange88ls1s-dime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 423
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

whoa i didnt expect this much feed back guys thanks but some of the comments ive read are a little far fetched like low 13s from a ext cab s10 with stock 5.3 come on didnt happen and who ever thinks i dont know how to tune a carb or set timing dont you worry about it the egt is right at 1350degrees my 60 ft times are 1.9 with ET streets not spinning at all it just hooks and goes 3000 stall holding tires with brake @ 2800 shifting at 6800
3.73 gears Sanderson Shorties full exhaust no cats magnaflow 18" muffler
TH350 transmission w shift kit this truck is running exactly what it should but im not stopping here i built this project to see the difference every bolt on part is going to give me thanks again for the feed back
Beau
Old 09-09-2009, 06:05 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (18)
 
zx9rgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wetumpka, AL
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orange88ls1s-dime
whoa i didnt expect this much feed back guys thanks but some of the comments ive read are a little far fetched like low 13s from a ext cab s10 with stock 5.3 come on didnt happen and who ever thinks i dont know how to tune a carb or set timing dont you worry about it the egt is right at 1350degrees my 60 ft times are 1.9 with ET streets not spinning at all it just hooks and goes 3000 stall holding tires with brake @ 2800 shifting at 6800
3.73 gears Sanderson Shorties full exhaust no cats magnaflow 18" muffler
TH350 transmission w shift kit this truck is running exactly what it should but im not stopping here i built this project to see the difference every bolt on part is going to give me thanks again for the feed back
Beau
Since I run a LSx in a s10 with shorty headers I would suggest you shift at a much lower RPM. There is no way that thing stock is making any power above 6k.
Old 09-09-2009, 06:52 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Monza355's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ambridge PA
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I really wasn't questioning your tuning skills but just wanted to know the other info. It's a great starting point for you to really step it up. I loved to see a vid if you have one.

Bill


Quick Reply: Second time @ the track for 5.3L 96' S10



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.