Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Chevelle LS1 Rear End Swap Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2010, 11:48 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
clm69z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Chevelle LS1 Rear End Swap Questions

I have a 72 Chevelle 'vert with the 8.2 non posi 2.73 factory rear end with a stock LS1 with a 4L60E transmission from an'00 Camaro SS. I have found a 68GTO rear end with 3:55's and an Eaton posi for a good price and would like to know the swap issues and if the application would work. The car is just a fun cruiser with a lot of coast cruising and some freeway, so I am not too worried about the ratios- the calculators say around 2,559 revs at 80 with the OD. What do you all think of it?
Old 05-04-2010, 05:55 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A 3.55 gear is pretty decent for all around driving. You can also vary the cruise RPM with tire diameter.

Dave
Old 05-04-2010, 08:31 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
clm69z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bowtie:

I thought that the ratio would not be too "short"- the current 2.73's must be good for about 150 mph!!

Anybody have any opinion/experience with this rearend swap? The rearend is already set up and so it would be relatively easy if it fits. I understand that the yoke may need to be changed and the driveshaft shortened; any other things I should consider?
Old 05-04-2010, 09:09 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
claytonisbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My understanding is 68 to 72 A-Body's have the same rear-end width and brackets. The earlier ones (64 to 67, ect) are a little narrower.
Old 05-04-2010, 10:07 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
70cartruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have my 8.2 with 3.55's.....pretty much the perfect street/strip gear for what i do with the car.......i have a th350 tho....wish i had overdrive....
Old 05-04-2010, 11:15 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
bczee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I would say the 3.55's are a good alround gear. It shuold swap in and be the same hub to hub width. As stated, the earlier A-Body were one inch narrower (56.5 vs 58.5).

You can usually tell the difference by the cover.. the BOP is irregular in shape and the Chevy has a more oval shape with a V in the cover. I think most of the internal are interchangable. (could be corrected ?)
There is also some difference in the BOP vs. Chevy rears.. but I don't recall what the differences are and if your not into Numbers matching or correct parts.. it would not make any difference then.

edit, just noticed I forgot to state, it is 1" per side.. (56.5" vs 58.5" hub to hub)

Last edited by bczee; 05-05-2010 at 12:27 AM.
Old 05-04-2010, 04:15 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have 3.31 gears in my Elcamino and no overdrive with the stock 14 inch SS wheels. My cruise RPM at 80 is 3000. With overdrive it would be 70% of that or 2100rpm. I put a 3.55 gear in my Chevelle with a MN12 (6 speed) with the double overdrive I could hit 150+ no sweat.
Old 05-04-2010, 05:57 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Hodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've owned seven A-bodies over the years. This is what I can tell you about rearend interchangeability:

1. All 64-72 A-body rearends are interchangeable. That is they physically mount the same way.
2. 64-67 A-body rearends are the same width.
3. 68-72 A-body rearends are the same width. these are about 1" wider than the 64-67 rearends.
4. There are two sizes u-joints used. do not remember the spicer numbers of the u-joints. The "small" u-joint uses EXTERNAL clips to hold it in place. The "large" u-joint uses injected plastic to hold it in place. If the "large" u-joint has been replaced, it is held in place with INTERNAL clips.
5. On Chevy rear ends, powerglides, TH-350s and early muncies (pre 1971) use the "small" u-joint. TH-400s (67 and up) and 71 & later muncies use the "large" u-joint.
6. #5 isn't true for BOP (buick, olds, & pontiac). My 66 GTO had a dual path trans (I think it was called a dual path; it was the pontiac version of the power glide) and had the "large" u-joints.

The u-joint differences is NO problem. Spicer makes an adapter u-joint that will mate the different u-joint sizes. Do a google search to find it. As far as the width difference, I would not worry about it either. If you have interference due to the rearend witth, there are many aftermarket wheels with custom offsets. I put custom offset pontiac mags on my 66 GTO in the mid-90's. Very reasonable back then.
Old 05-07-2010, 01:45 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
clm69z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks everybody for the input. I think I have decided to just upgrade my original rear end with an Eaton posi and either a 3:36 or 3:55 gear ratio. Since it is basically a stock 'vert w/an LS1, I don't plan on doing any real drag racing with it so I am leaning toward the lower gear set. I actually had a driveline shop recommend 3:73's with the OD and I thought that shounded way too short for this ap....



Quick Reply: Chevelle LS1 Rear End Swap Questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.