Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LSx conversion- Fox or SN95

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2010, 08:49 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
LS1BADZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LSx conversion- Fox or SN95

What's easier or has more benefits to doing a LSx swap? Computer harness, clearance, etc....

Comparing a 94 Mustang 3.8 vs a 79 Mustang 5.0

Thanks
Old 05-31-2010, 09:30 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
6.0Nova?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They are essentially the same car. '94 would probably be a little easier because the fuel system is already set up for EFI, but that's about it.
Old 05-31-2010, 11:11 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Inbred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

same thing since you would have to swap out for 4.6 k member on both.
fox will be lighter...
Old 06-28-2010, 06:40 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I see no good reason you couldn't fit the '79 with a used K from any '87-'93 2.3L 'stang. Not as light as a tubular, but far cheaper. '94 has 5 lug, which has more wheel choices, and 11" front rotors.



Quick Reply: LSx conversion- Fox or SN95



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.