Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

older vortecs vs 03+ question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2012, 09:28 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
melon07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default older vortecs vs 03+ question

doing some research and can't find an answer

why are the 99-03 5.3's cheaper than the 03+ ??

is it solely on the fact they have drive by wire or is there more to it.

found a 01 for dirt cheap and the newer ones are double the price with more miles

thanks
Old 10-29-2012, 02:39 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
78_elky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 480
Received 104 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Two main points I have heard, but I am sure there are others:
1) The older engines have a longer crank, that will only work with an older trans (turbo350/400 700-R4) or a 4L80e. The 03+ have an adapter that can be removed so they work with the 4L60e. One solution is to buy a new crank and then it won't make any difference.
2) The older engines have iron heads, and newer ones have aluminum. Again you can buy new heads.

I have a '99 vortec engine and it wasn't a big deal to me because of the price. I can afford to buy a new crank and keep my cost below the cost of a newer engines. And as far as the heads are concerned I was planning to swap those as well so it didn't matter what the engine came with originally.
Jess
Old 10-29-2012, 02:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
brewster240's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: clearwater fl
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ what you just posted only applies to 6.0 lq4 in 99-00 trucks.

rumor is that some early 4.8 manual trans had a long crank also, but i have not personally verified that.

doesnt apply to 5.3 at all.
Old 10-29-2012, 03:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,683
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The 99-00 early 4.8L used with the NV3500 had the long crank as well.

Years Liters Casting # Trans Flange Thickness
1999-2000 4.8L 312 V-8 M/T 1.250 thick flange
1999-2000 6.0L 215 V-8 M/T or A/T 1.250 thick flange
1999-2005 4.8L 482 V-8 A/T .857 thick flange
2001-2005 4.8L 482 V-8 M/T .857 thick flange
1999-2005 5.3L 216 V-8 A/T .857 thick flange
1997-2005 5.7L 216 V-8 .857 thick flange
2001-2005 6.0L 216 V-8 M/T or A/T .857 thick flange


Originally Posted by 78 elky
Two main points I have heard, but I am sure there are others:
1) The older engines have a longer crank, that will only work with an older trans (turbo350/400 700-R4) or a 4L80e. The 03+ have an adapter that can be removed so they work with the 4L60e. One solution is to buy a new crank and then it won't make any difference.
The 5.3L never had the longer crank. Only the early 00-99 4.8L used with the NV3500 manual and the 6.0L LQ4 iron head 99-00 units.

The 5.3L was never used with a manual in the trucks.

The only motor using the spacer now are the those used with the 4l80e.

Originally Posted by 78 elky
2) The older engines have iron heads, and newer ones have aluminum. Again you can buy new heads.

I have a '99 vortec engine and it wasn't a big deal to me because of the price. I can afford to buy a new crank and keep my cost below the cost of a newer engines. And as far as the heads are concerned I was planning to swap those as well so it didn't matter what the engine came with originally.
Jess
The only motor to use iron heads was the 99-00 LQ4 long crank motor.

DBC is a factor as well as most have lots of miles now. Also demand has dropped alot for regular replacement cores as those trucks are getting rarer, not alot of money to be made on a motor that would sit nowdays. As most yard are geared toward reg. customers not people doing swaps.

Last edited by Bo185; 10-29-2012 at 03:25 PM.
Old 10-29-2012, 06:04 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
melon07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

okay thanks for the info.. I noticed they had lower compression has well so I was kinda confused why people weren't using them for a budget turbo build
Old 10-29-2012, 06:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
brewster240's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: clearwater fl
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

people are using them for budget turbo build....
Old 10-29-2012, 06:24 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,683
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by melon07
okay thanks for the info.. I noticed they had lower compression has well so I was kinda confused why people weren't using them for a budget turbo build
The 5.3L's???

The Gen IV's 2007-up are 9.9:1
The Gen III's 99-2006 dished pistons versions are all 9.5:1
The Gen III L33 had flat tops and 9.9:1

Were did you notice they had lower CR?
Old 10-29-2012, 06:42 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
melon07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whoops nvm. the chart was talking about 05+ having higher compression on the l33, ly5, and lh6
Old 10-30-2012, 01:12 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
454ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Carver, MA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Weren't early 5.3's prone to piston slap problems, as I seem to remember?
Old 10-30-2012, 12:06 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,683
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 454ragtop
Weren't early 5.3's prone to piston slap problems, as I seem to remember?
Yeah, around '02 or '03 (can't remember off top of my head) GM added a teflon coating the the side of the pistons to help prevent it or lesson the noise. It never really hurt anything per-say just more of an annoying noise.



Quick Reply: older vortecs vs 03+ question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.