Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Hooker G-Body LS Swap System Preview

Old 02-22-2015, 02:30 PM
  #461  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fry_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Marengo, Ia
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Toddoky just curios if I'm going to see you or the MCSS on Power Tour this year? It would be great to see the car or meet you in person.
Old 02-22-2015, 04:02 PM
  #462  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fry_
Toddoky just curios if I'm going to see you or the MCSS on Power Tour this year? It would be great to see the car or meet you in person.
I won't be out on the Power Tour, but I'm fairly certain the Monte will be. Both myself and the Monte will be at LS Fest.
Old 02-22-2015, 10:47 PM
  #463  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
WFO_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: classic chevrolet
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Toddoky,

was there any test fitting of the high ram intake on this application & what kind of interference/hood clearance did it yield?
Old 02-23-2015, 06:19 AM
  #464  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WFO_SS
Toddoky,

was there any test fitting of the high ram intake on this application & what kind of interference/hood clearance did it yield?
We never tested it unfortunately.
Old 03-16-2015, 10:32 PM
  #465  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
onebadbowtie86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 902
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Hey Tod,
What was the determined set back of the hooker mounts from the stock location? I want to say it was 5/8" or 3/4" setback from the sbc location?
Old 03-17-2015, 07:39 AM
  #466  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
llorracs93s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tod,

What are the possibilities of these getting any sort of rust problems? Snow finally melted for me to get to my car and my TSP headers have rust on the primaries near the top of the headers. They only have 500 or so miles on them and as stainless steel. Mine had a polished finish and I see yours are a bare steel finish.

Any concerns? Reason I'm asking is I am not too pleased my headers already rusted and if I ever went another header route I'd like to hope yours would last longer than these have. Plus I have about 1-1/4 inch set back plates so not sure if yours would fit with that much of a set back
Old 03-17-2015, 09:42 AM
  #467  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onebadbowtie86
Hey Tod,
What was the determined set back of the hooker mounts from the stock location? I want to say it was 5/8" or 3/4" setback from the sbc location?
Yes, by my estimation I would say it's 3/4" as we used the brackets last year to set-up two cars for the LS swap challenge at LSFest and both cars were configured to use the stock crossmembers and TH350 transmissions by slotting the center mount holes towards the front of the car in crossmembers by approximately 1/4".
Old 03-17-2015, 09:51 AM
  #468  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by llorracs93s10
Tod,

What are the possibilities of these getting any sort of rust problems? Snow finally melted for me to get to my car and my TSP headers have rust on the primaries near the top of the headers. They only have 500 or so miles on them and as stainless steel. Mine had a polished finish and I see yours are a bare steel finish.

Any concerns? Reason I'm asking is I am not too pleased my headers already rusted and if I ever went another header route I'd like to hope yours would last longer than these have. Plus I have about 1-1/4 inch set back plates so not sure if yours would fit with that much of a set back
Do you have a picture you can post up? Are your headers 304ss or 409ss? All stainless steel headers will discolor from use with the final color being close to chocolate brown if you drive the vehicle hard. 304ss will scale, but it's rare to see it rust unless the raw material was stored on mild steel racks or worked with tooling(i.e. wire brushes)that was also used on mild steel materials; doing so will contaminate the surface of the stainless steel with particles that will indeed rust.

The Hooker headers cannot successfully be installed with that amount of set-back due to the routing of the tubes around the rear lower control arm frame pockets. The height of your engine mounts will also more than likely cause interference issues between the header collectors and the floors. The headers really fit well, but only when installed with the Hooker engine brackets and transmission crossmember.
Old 03-17-2015, 10:10 AM
  #469  
On The Tree
 
Petey-Pop-383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Toddoky do you offer a 2" primary, 3.5" collector header for a LS/G-body swap?
Old 03-17-2015, 10:29 AM
  #470  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Petey-Pop-383
Toddoky do you offer a 2" primary, 3.5" collector header for a LS/G-body swap?
We don't. The lower installed engine height established by the Hooker engine brackets make 1-7/8" primaries the largest practical tube size that can be routed in this application with good clearances all around. The 3.5" collector size will also present ground clearance issues that will be unacceptable to many users. I understand the need exists for such a header in specific circumstances, but it's outside the design intentions of the Hooker system of components.
Old 03-17-2015, 11:41 AM
  #471  
On The Tree
 
Petey-Pop-383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply.

Do you see a big difference between 1 7/8" and 2" primaries on a nitrous motor?
408cuin
Old 03-17-2015, 12:31 PM
  #472  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Petey-Pop-383
Thanks for the reply.

Do you see a big difference between 1 7/8" and 2" primaries on a nitrous motor?
408cuin
You could depending on the amount of shot and your tune, but if the 2" headers in question have low hanging collectors or are based around the geometry of swap plates that provide non-optimized engine inclination/U-joint working angles then the extra power gained is worthless in my opinion.
Old 03-18-2015, 06:22 PM
  #473  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
llorracs93s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
Do you have a picture you can post up? Are your headers 304ss or 409ss? All stainless steel headers will discolor from use with the final color being close to chocolate brown if you drive the vehicle hard. 304ss will scale, but it's rare to see it rust unless the raw material was stored on mild steel racks or worked with tooling(i.e. wire brushes)that was also used on mild steel materials; doing so will contaminate the surface of the stainless steel with particles that will indeed rust.

The Hooker headers cannot successfully be installed with that amount of set-back due to the routing of the tubes around the rear lower control arm frame pockets. The height of your engine mounts will also more than likely cause interference issues between the header collectors and the floors. The headers really fit well, but only when installed with the Hooker engine brackets and transmission crossmember.
Here are the pictures I have for my headers. I think the trans crossmember could still fit with your headers just because they do tuck up along the floor pretty well being the Iceman crossmember. But anyways, here are a few pictures of the headers. Not great but I took them before the sun went down....

Name:  20150318_180828_zpsbk5etpdv.jpg
Views: 528
Size:  179.0 KB

Name:  20150318_180846_zpsymsfvhtb.jpg
Views: 559
Size:  187.6 KB

Name:  20150318_180906_zpscxijibnn.jpg
Views: 518
Size:  159.4 KB

Dont mind the discoloring.....I had a oil leak on a drive home and it went all over the collectors and some piping...
Name:  20150318_182814_zpsohsp85pm.jpg
Views: 513
Size:  165.4 KB

Name:  20150318_182834_zpsh6hbvrzm.jpg
Views: 517
Size:  184.2 KB
Old 03-18-2015, 08:10 PM
  #474  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by llorracs93s10
Here are the pictures I have for my headers. I think the trans crossmember could still fit with your headers just because they do tuck up along the floor pretty well being the Iceman crossmember. But anyways, here are a few pictures of the headers. Not great but I took them before the sun went down....







Dont mind the discoloring.....I had a oil leak on a drive home and it went all over the collectors and some piping...


Thanks for getting around to posting the images Justin. My experience tells me that there is some type of plating or coating on your headers. Bare SS headers typically do not turn blue from the temperatures normally experienced in an exhaust system (peak temps of 1,600 to 1,800 degrees F.)...it turns from bronze to chocolate brown in color. What material were your headers advertised to be made from?

If you compare your undercar shots to those I put up on post #257 you can see the difference in ground clearance that results from using components that are designed at the same time from a single source. I don't see a dead- center photo under your car, but if you post one up it would be the most telling in showing the differences. Also keep in mind that your engine is positioned higher in your frame than what is achieved using the Hooker engine brackets, which in turn creates a higher vehicle center of gravity and U-joint working angles that are of a greater degree value (lower RPM potential of your driveshaft/U-joints).

If you have interest in using the Hooker long-tubes, I welcome you as a customer and user of our products. They may be quite compatible with your Iceman crossmember, but their installation will definitely require the use of the matching Hooker engine brackets to avoid ending up with a basket-case installation. That's a good thing for you as you will see an improvement in your U-joint working angles and center of gravity as a side benefit. Let me know if I can be of any more help to you in your decision making.
Old 03-18-2015, 08:20 PM
  #475  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
onebadbowtie86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 902
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I need to get some of the hooker long tubes, Im not digging my lack of ground clearance with my hedman's

Name:  ls2headers1_zpsqnmf7ybq.jpeg
Views: 528
Size:  114.5 KB
Old 03-18-2015, 08:22 PM
  #476  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
onebadbowtie86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 902
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Justin, If you get a set of the hooker headers will you try them with your 1" setback plates or do the hooker mounts at the same time?
Old 03-18-2015, 08:27 PM
  #477  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
llorracs93s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
Thanks for getting around to posting the images Justin. My experience tells me that there is some type of plating or coating on your headers. Bare SS headers typically do not turn blue from the temperatures normally experienced in an exhaust system (peak temps of 1,600 to 1,800 degrees F.)...it turns from bronze to chocolate brown in color. What material were your headers advertised to be made from?

If you compare your undercar shots to those I put up on post #257 you can see the difference in ground clearance that results from using components that are designed at the same time from a single source. I don't see a dead- center photo under your car, but if you post one up it would be the most telling in showing the differences. Also keep in mind that your engine is positioned higher in your frame than what is achieved using the Hooker engine brackets, which in turn creates a higher vehicle center of gravity and U-joint working angles that are of a greater degree value (lower RPM potential of your driveshaft/U-joints).

If you have interest in using the Hooker long-tubes, I welcome you as a customer and user of our products. They may be quite compatible with your Iceman crossmember, but their installation will definitely require the use of the matching Hooker engine brackets to avoid ending up with a basket-case installation. That's a good thing for you as you will see an improvement in your U-joint working angles and center of gravity as a side benefit. Let me know if I can be of any more help to you in your decision making.

They are 304 stainless steel headers. As for the header /motor mounts swap that would move my transmission and overall drivetrain forward compared to what I have now correct? Only reason I asked that is a mounting position of the tranny crossmember and drive shaft length. and honestly at this point I probably will just stay with what I have since I have other pressing issues with the car but I eventually want my exhaust redone as you can see it hangs down too low so if that calls for headers that tuck up more then I like to do that as well.

And as for the dead center photo, do you mean a side profile shot or front of the car?
Old 03-18-2015, 08:29 PM
  #478  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
llorracs93s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Middletown, DE
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onebadbowtie86
Justin, If you get a set of the hooker headers will you try them with your 1" setback plates or do the hooker mounts at the same time?
If i were to do them, I'd try with the current mounts just due to the fact I'd have to probably do something about my trans and motor moving forward some changing the crossmember mounting position. Plus same would go for the DS as well.
Old 03-18-2015, 08:30 PM
  #479  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onebadbowtie86
I need to get some of the hooker long tubes, Im not digging my lack of ground clearance with my hedman's

Your ground clearance can certainly be improved upon onebadbowtie86. That would be my greatest gripe regarding the Hedman's if I were to use them...and the slip-on collectors would not make me feel all warm and fuzzy either.
Old 03-18-2015, 08:36 PM
  #480  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
onebadbowtie86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 902
Received 62 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

The headers clear everything well, I just dont understand why they hang so low. Also where the collectors slip over the 4 primary tubes, they leak. I would like to buy a set of the hookers and try them with the 1" setbacks, but if they wouldnt work I would get the hooker mounts.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: New Hooker G-Body LS Swap System Preview



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.