Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Hooker G-Body LS Swap System Preview

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2017, 02:44 PM
  #761  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Senna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 166
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mOtOrHeAd MiKe
Or flip the assembly, or drill and tap a hole in the bottom, or run a flex line to a remote location... I am considering a lot of different options. But, I appreciate the advice.
Flipping the assembly didn't look like the answer, I would think it's to thin to drill and tap but I like the flex line and remote location.

Personally I like small and compact when possible.
Old 01-02-2017, 04:36 PM
  #762  
TECH Fanatic
 
jimmyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,525
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default


Been running mine like this for a year or so . No issues
Old 01-02-2017, 04:45 PM
  #763  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

^...jimmyg for the win.
Old 01-02-2017, 09:10 PM
  #764  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
G-BODY-JAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by L92 OLDS
Agreed. The Holley guys did their homework and provide a good product for the G body guys.....In my opinion it's the best engineered system available hands down. My only complaints are: 1) The factory Z bar for the shifter to steering column interlock can't be used. The Lokar cable might be an option but that looks like a PITA to me 2) The oil pressure sender and or oil cooling lines are too close to the headers as noted above. I finally found a T fitting with the correct threads in England of all places. It allowed me to T the oil port behind the intake.
aeroflow makes the best adapter for this problem im tellin ya
part # af 166-05-02BLK
Old 01-02-2017, 09:12 PM
  #765  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
G-BODY-JAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Senna
Flipping the assembly didn't look like the answer, I would think it's to thin to drill and tap but I like the flex line and remote location.

Personally I like small and compact when possible.
look up aeroflow part number AF 166-05-02BLK its the best solution ive found
Old 01-02-2017, 10:04 PM
  #766  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Senna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 166
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G-BODY-JAMES
look up aeroflow part number AF 166-05-02BLK its the best solution ive found
Nice piece. Thanks
Old 01-08-2017, 10:36 PM
  #767  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
HighLiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What happened with the short tube stainless headers?
Old 01-09-2017, 09:25 AM
  #768  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HighLiner
What happened with the short tube stainless headers?
They will come to exist when that header application gets migrated over to the Hooker Blackheart line, which entails moving the production from our Mississippi facility to our Bowling Green, KY facility. We discussed these in a meeting this morning and I think it will take a month or two longer to see it happen as it's an operations issue.
Old 01-24-2017, 10:46 PM
  #769  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
G-BODY-JAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default th400 to crossmember pic

couldnt figure out how to pm you a pic toddoky so here it is
like i said im probably missing the poly mount arent I
haha
but if the poly mount was there like a th350 would i even need that aluminum block???
Attached Thumbnails New Hooker G-Body LS Swap System Preview-th400-mount.jpg  
Old 01-25-2017, 05:52 AM
  #770  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G-BODY-JAMES
couldnt figure out how to pm you a pic toddoky so here it is
like i said im probably missing the poly mount arent I
haha
but if the poly mount was there like a th350 would i even need that aluminum block???
PM sent
Old 02-02-2017, 08:56 AM
  #771  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default New Holley low-mount A/C compressor bracket

I recently validated the fitment of the new Holley 4th-gen f-body style accessory drive set-up and low-mount Sanden A/C compressor bracket on a co-worker's G-body wagon and thought I'd let followers of this thread know they both fit great for anyone using the Hooker LS swap engine brackets on their G-body swap. The accessory drive can be installed only at the F-body and truck offsets; the A/C compressor bracket can be installed at those two offsets on this application, as well as the Corvette offset spacing on certain other applications.






Old 02-02-2017, 10:51 AM
  #772  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
WFO_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: classic chevrolet
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
I recently validated the fitment of the new Holley 4th-gen f-body style accessory drive set-up and low-mount Sanden A/C compressor bracket on a co-worker's G-body wagon and thought I'd let followers of this thread know they both fit great for anyone using the Hooker LS swap engine brackets on their G-body swap. The accessory drive can be installed only at the F-body and truck offsets; the A/C compressor bracket can be installed at those two offsets on this application, as well as the Corvette offset spacing on certain other applications.
low mount a/c compressor is great news for twin turbo hopefuls! one question: i know you said earlier in the thread that the only accessories that will clear a 670 series steering gear were the truck accessories. does the f-body 4th gen vs 5th gen spacing make any difference in the clearance?
Old 02-02-2017, 10:59 AM
  #773  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

I can't make an absolute judgement on the fitment of this new FEAD with the 600 series box at this time (didn't have one to test during this opportunity), but I'm going to assume that the same previous exclusion of the OE 4th-gen FEAD with the 600 box applies here as the position of the alternator on the Holley set-up is in exactly the same spot as the OE 4th-gen alternator.
Old 02-02-2017, 11:16 AM
  #774  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
WFO_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: classic chevrolet
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Toddoky
I can't make an absolute judgement on the fitment of this new FEAD with the 600 series box at this time (didn't have one to test during this opportunity), but I'm going to assume that the same previous exclusion of the OE 4th-gen FEAD with the 600 box applies here as the position of the alternator on the Holley set-up is in exactly the same spot as the OE 4th-gen alternator.
ah, i see. so, since the 5th gen f-body setup is at the truck spacing, i'm assuming clearance is even less. correct?
Old 02-02-2017, 11:37 AM
  #775  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WFO_SS
ah, i see. so, since the 5th gen f-body setup is at the truck spacing, i'm assuming clearance is even less. correct?
I've never done any test fitting of 5th-gen F-body specific accessory drive components, but you would be correct in thinking that the interference with this new Holley FEAD would be worse on a G-body if installation was attempted at the truck offset instead of the F-body spacing.
Old 03-14-2017, 09:38 PM
  #776  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
BanditDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I scoured the thread and was looking for some feedback on the starter fitment with 1.875" headers. Driver's side fit beautifully and while the passenger side header fits very well also, I am noticing that starter clearance particularly in the area of the wiring harness and typical routing is not great. Has anyone else experienced this issue with a PSI conversion harness? It appears I am pinching the starter wiring against the block with one of the primary tubes so I will most likely have to go over the engine, down the front and under the engine mount along the pan to get to the starter.

Definitely not the end of the world, just wondering how folks routed their wiring in the area of the starter. I have a high torque mini starter for LS and one of the primary tubes lines right up with the wiring...appears to be less than an inch from the primary positive terminal.

Thoughts?
Dave
Old 03-15-2017, 06:29 AM
  #777  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BanditDave
I scoured the thread and was looking for some feedback on the starter fitment with 1.875" headers. Driver's side fit beautifully and while the passenger side header fits very well also, I am noticing that starter clearance particularly in the area of the wiring harness and typical routing is not great. Has anyone else experienced this issue with a PSI conversion harness? It appears I am pinching the starter wiring against the block with one of the primary tubes so I will most likely have to go over the engine, down the front and under the engine mount along the pan to get to the starter.

Definitely not the end of the world, just wondering how folks routed their wiring in the area of the starter. I have a high torque mini starter for LS and one of the primary tubes lines right up with the wiring...appears to be less than an inch from the primary positive terminal.

Thoughts?
Dave
Hello Dave. Is your starter clockable, or fixed? The only aftermarket starter I test for fitment is the one from MSD since it can be clocked.
Old 03-15-2017, 12:41 PM
  #778  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
BanditDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hi Toddoky,

I am pretty sure it is clockable. Where it is getting pinched is between the block and header tube. Being able to clock it over, though, will definitely help with running it towards the front...should be able to buy myself at least another 1/2" or so then wrap it in DEI material.

I will check and report back. Will also post some pics of the current situation.

Best,
Dave
Old 03-15-2017, 01:29 PM
  #779  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Posts: 1,129
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BanditDave
I scoured the thread and was looking for some feedback on the starter fitment with 1.875" headers. Driver's side fit beautifully and while the passenger side header fits very well also, I am noticing that starter clearance particularly in the area of the wiring harness and typical routing is not great. Has anyone else experienced this issue with a PSI conversion harness? It appears I am pinching the starter wiring against the block with one of the primary tubes so I will most likely have to go over the engine, down the front and under the engine mount along the pan to get to the starter.
I will have to look.

I just did the final install on our starter this past weekend. Also being a G-body this is sort of relevant. I ran the factory purple exciter wire along the fire wall below the drip tray/wipers and dropped it before the HVAC box, it then snakes along the trans dip stick tube and along the block between the starter solenoid and the block. The main power wire for the starter (this is a 4th Gen F-body battery/starter/alt harness) is run back along the frame and over the motor mount to the starter solenoid. I made a heat shield for the starter solenoid and wiring, and all of the wiring is loomed and tied back/down. I am using a factory 4th Gen starter.

I did not have any immediate interference issues installing the headers and loosely setting them in place; but I have yet torque them down. I can try to find some time to work on that tonight.
Old 03-15-2017, 03:48 PM
  #780  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Toddoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,546
Received 203 Likes on 123 Posts

Default

The Holley MCSS happened to be on a lift in the engineering lab this morning so I took a look at the starter and the wiring at the solenoid. The lab tech who finished off the project routed all the wires through a section of silicone hose to protect them and the car has been driven without any issues for about 2 years now.


Quick Reply: New Hooker G-Body LS Swap System Preview



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.