Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

68 Camaro, engine swap options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2014, 08:52 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Rgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 68 Camaro, engine swap options

I'm just starting to gather parts for an Ls swap into my 68 camaro. My plans are to keep it NA and I'm hoping for 400+ rwhp. I've came across 2 engines in my area that I think would be great starting points but not sure which to buy. One is an '06 Lq9(truck, iron block) and the other is an '09 L76(truck, aluminum block, 823 heads), both are similar mileage and the l76 is a $300 more. Which would be the better option? Can I achieve my hp goals with Ls3 intake and cam?
Old 11-23-2014, 10:07 AM
  #2  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Rgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No opinions or preferences between the two??
Old 11-23-2014, 04:51 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
76larkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: alburnett, iowa
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go the aluminum motor. I did for my skylark because of the weight savings. I dont know what to tell you on cam as I put mine in stock for now. I wanted to get up and running work things out first.
Old 11-23-2014, 05:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
showdog75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hixson TN
Posts: 1,010
Received 184 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

I'd opt for the aluminum l76.
Old 12-01-2014, 10:27 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
ryanleiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lighter weight is always better, but I'm not sure you'll notice much difference in performance just by the difference in blocks.

You could spend the $300 on higher performance parts. It really depends on your purpose for the vehicle to make a decision about the engine specifically.

Either engine is going to be a dramatic upgrade over original equipment for the car.
Old 12-01-2014, 11:39 AM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ablakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

823 heads are gear for NA applications. Put a cam in there and you will see 450rwhp no sweat.

I am currently doing a swap in a 69 using an lq4. But I went iron because 1. I had it from a different build and 2. It will be twin turbo.

Good luck! and get some pics up when you get started.
Old 12-01-2014, 06:44 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
76larkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: alburnett, iowa
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive got a L33 5.3 from 2006 silverado in my skylark. Just got it running but have things to do to make streetable. Mostly few wires and guages as not made panel for them yet. I had Brendan at LT1 Swap.com program the pcm with what would be considered a chip programmer install. Seems peppy just messing around in circle driveway. Try a L33 5.3 in your camaro, its all aluminum. Factory rated 315 horsepower and less weight is why I did it. Probably upgrade cam later tho.



Quick Reply: 68 Camaro, engine swap options



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.