Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes

Old 01-17-2017, 06:44 AM
  #101  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Looks like we're running different types of MAF's. My intake tube is aluminum and also sits right behind the fan (pic below - MAF right beside the throttle body motor). I haven't seen intake air temps any greater than 10F higher than ambient. Does your filter have access to intake air at ambient temps from behind the grill or under the car?

Old 01-18-2017, 12:38 PM
  #102  
Teching In
 
Azryael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 24
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very cool build!

I was initially going to look for a 108/109 body to do something like this, but have since decided to swap a small-block into my W126 500SE.
Old 01-23-2017, 05:45 PM
  #103  
TECH Resident
 
DW SD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 952
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

This is such a great build!

Look forward to the dyno #s.

Doug
Old 01-23-2017, 10:51 PM
  #104  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Yount
Looks like we're running different types of MAF's. My intake tube is aluminum and also sits right behind the fan (pic below - MAF right beside the throttle body motor). I haven't seen intake air temps any greater than 10F higher than ambient. Does your filter have access to intake air at ambient temps from behind the grill or under the car?

Great looking swap! Very clean! How I spent it to drive? I bet massive fun.

While driving I should get airflow from under the front sheetmetal/bumper. On the dyno only getting what the shops fans are getting to it.

But the temp sensor is right in the airflow from the radiator, so will be better to move it.
Old 01-23-2017, 10:53 PM
  #105  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Azryael
Very cool build!

I was initially going to look for a 108/109 body to do something like this, but have since decided to swap a small-block into my W126 500SE.
Thanks for the compliment!

There are pros and cons to every decision, planning is your friend!
Old 01-23-2017, 10:56 PM
  #106  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DW SD
This is such a great build!

Look forward to the dyno #s.

Doug
Thanks Doug.

I've been working on my to do list from dyno day. I've received the proper adapters to install the water temp sender and the oil pressure sender for the gauges. I've replaced the questionable AN fitting going to the remote oil filter and fixed that leak. Also fabricated a shroud for the radiator fan, hope that solves the higher than wanted engine temp. Still have to relocate the intake air temp sensor and weld in another O2 sensor bung for dyno diagnostics.

The steering is my biggest issue. What I put together with the Cavalier rack was good enough to drive around the block and get on and off the dyno, but sucks!

The turning radius is so bad it's probably not practical. I was always concerned about the leverage put on the center bolt location with the tie rods 20" apart. Valid concern as there is movement.

So back to the drawing board. I just ordered a rear steer unit from Flaming River along with their special U-joint and tie rods ends needed. The pivot points are about 1 1/2" farther outbound than stock, so it will take some more effort to get set right to minimize bumpsteer. The good thing about this unit is that the tie rods are at each end of the rack, so gives me more space for install. The bad thing is the price, a good $900 for the require parts. Then I'm going to fabricate new steering arms that locate the tie rod connnection closer to the center of the wheel to get the full turning radius back.

We will have guests from the mainland for the next week, so no updates for a bit.

Hope to be able to drive it to the dyno, this time, within 30 days. Also anxious about the dyno numbers.
Old 01-23-2017, 10:58 PM
  #107  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Thx - yeah, 440hp in 2980 lbs is fun....specially when it idles at 650 rpm all Honda-like.

My point was the my temp sensor/maf is right in the rad airstream too, but I'm seeing much lower temps. Perhaps it's the moving down the road vs shop fan, although in my experience having the hood open expels lots of heat. Can't wait to see yours headed down the road.
Old 01-24-2017, 12:51 AM
  #108  
Teching In
 
Azryael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 24
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coasttocoast
Thanks for the compliment!

There are pros and cons to every decision, planning is your friend!
Ah yes, one of the biggest cons is working to keep the original recirculating ball steering, but a custom oil pan should solve that issue.

Pros are no more CIS, no more 722.3 4-speed auto, better AC compressor... list goes on!

The car is one of my daily drivers, so I want to swap in something domestic that's easier to take care of and parts availability is not a concern.

Either way, this is very cool, and a serious motivator!
Old 03-06-2017, 12:32 PM
  #109  
TECH Resident
 
DW SD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 952
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Did you get the new steering rack installed?
Old 03-07-2017, 01:33 AM
  #110  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DW SD
Did you get the new steering rack installed?
Thanks for your interest.

I have had a rough time trying to locate the rack and parts to connect the steering shaft to the rack. After three orders I finally found a combination that works smoothly.

After a few geometry calculations I shortened the steering arms by the correct amount to achieve the same turning radius with only 6" of travel from the rack.

Saturday I dropped the car back on the ground, roughly adjusted the toe-in/out and drove the car out of the garage for its first bath in 7 months.

As I'm in the process of completely changing out the electrical system, I'm not ready for a test drive.

But now that it's clean, along with the garage, I realize I need to make some more serious changes. The engine and the rack are too close to the ground. My newer Mercedes has 5 1/2" of clearance at the lowest point, the oil pan and rack on this project are at 4 1/4". I basically set the engine height to slip under the stock brake booster, I see now that was a mistake. I've spent a frustrating month+ working on the steering, so I'm going to spend time completing the wiring upgrade and some other odds and ends.

I think I can raise the engine an inch by adding a steel shim under the motor mount and the same for the trans mount without any other changes except a new smaller diameter brake booster. I'm also looking at some more changes to the rack install that might get the steering geometry back to stock.

Right now I'm enjoying the challenge of schematics and soldering.

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1921.jpg
Old 03-07-2017, 06:26 AM
  #111  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Is the new rack/steering arm set up giving you a decent Ackermann angle as well? I've done some experimenting with shorter steering arms to give "quicker" steering on mine - but it totally screwed up the Ackermann which results in some interesting unintended side effects.
Old 03-07-2017, 11:09 AM
  #112  
TECH Resident
 
DW SD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 952
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

May I recommend a hydroboost (hydraulic) unit to replace the vacuum booster, which is much smaller? In my old truck, I wanted a modern driving experience in terms of ergonomics, so I moved the pedals around, changed the pedal geometry as well as steering wheel placement.

In the truck, the brake master and booster is mounted under the body and to the frame. A larger diameter booster wasn't an option, but braking feel, power and boost, frankly sucked. I read about hydroboost setup and tried it.

The amount of boost and firm pedal is awesome (I even run an upsized master cylinder for lower pedal travel and improved modulation). Years ago, it was pointed out to me that NASA studies indicate modulation with our legs improves with reduced braking pedal travel / displacement. Counter intuitive, but if you look at modern (probably old, too) race cars, their pedal travel is very small.

A little extra plumbing is required, but well worth it. For my power steering pump return from the booster, I just added a stainless barbed Tee from McMaster of the right size. I run good quality stainless hose clamps and good quality rubber lines (like Mercedes OEM).

I have a thread on here about the booster I used and modifications to the hydroboost unit. it was a new OEM Delco unit from Amazon for about $125 (+ / - $25). The high pressure lines were about $200 that I assembled myself with Eaton, I think (of which Aeroquip is a subsidiary). Normal AN lines aren't appropriate for 2000 psi applications.

Hope that might help.

Messing with steering geometry is tricky.

Are the new rack arms the same length as the lower control arms?

Doug
Old 03-07-2017, 06:18 PM
  #113  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DW SD
Counter intuitive, but if you look at modern (probably old, too) race cars, their pedal travel is very small.
makes sense to me, I like a hard, short pedal for decel and a soft long pedal for accel
Old 03-07-2017, 06:20 PM
  #114  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,330
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Michael Yount
Is the new rack/steering arm set up giving you a decent Ackermann angle as well? I've done some experimenting with shorter steering arms to give "quicker" steering on mine - but it totally screwed up the Ackermann which results in some interesting unintended side effects.

crank dat ackerman! drift drift drift stance stance stance vape

sorry couldnt help. been looking at e34's on stanceworks.com
Old 03-09-2017, 12:11 PM
  #115  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks all for your comments and questions!

As the projects stands, many issues need to be addressed with steering geometry, engine height, and related interference. The engine and rack are a little over 1" low for proper ground clearance, Ackerman might be off a touch, and due to the current rack setup the tie rod is about 1 1/2" shorter than the lower control arm. I have used hydroboost on another Jeep project before with good success, looking at that as an option here too, thanks. These are all issues that can be overcome. Researching parts and planning now.

But many items to work on and the above has been bogging down my time and spirit!

Since the engine is properly tuned and broke in and I have a "usable" steering system, I can at least move the car around enough to work on other fun things like wiring!

I bought a new universal wiring kit and am in the process of changing out all of the wiring. So far I have completed both the rear and front sections. Everything is complete now except for the dash and underdash. I am unsoldering the old wire from the lighting/accessory connectors, soldering back the new wire and for harness protection wrapping with a heavy cloth tape. I also removed the cable/lever hood release and replaced with a heavy duty solenoid to further clean up the engine compartment and interior. (FYI, button to activate will be located out of reach while driving and I have a remote manual pull in case the solenoid fails)

In a couple of days I should have the electrical done enough to actually drive the car enough to further troubleshoot before ordering parts and starting new changes.
Old 03-09-2017, 07:20 PM
  #116  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Post up some updating pics if you have 'em --- love seeing shots of this one.
Old 03-14-2017, 02:37 AM
  #117  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Yount
Post up some updating pics if you have 'em --- love seeing shots of this one.
Not much photo worthy right now, wiring is so unphotogenic! The last few days have been somewhat positive. After much time in tracing out wires and studying diagrams I moved forward on actually connecting everything to the main harness/fusebox under the dash. I pretty much have all the wires routed to where they go, zip tied in bundles and some terminated. I cleaned up and painted the original horns, installed in pretty much stock position, and they work!

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1933.jpg

I built a bracket today to hold the ECU and have a plan formulated on all the rest of the relay banks and new electronic controls I'm adding.

So now that the hood latch is connected along with the horn, brake lights and turn signals I'm going to take it for a spin around the block, maybe Wednesday.

Still plotting out the engine and steering moves, looking at options.

Talked to Flaming River about what parts they can sell me to make this work. They are USELESS AND UNHELPFULL! They sell this kit for a Chevelle that has what they call a TrackBar.

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1934.jpg

This would help me increase the length of the tie rods. But they won't sell me the parts. I asked what would happen if I bought the whole kit, was in an accident, and needed a couple of replacement parts. He said that wasn't the case, but if it was, I would have to pull the rack and ship it to them to replace the parts. Very frustrating. So looks like more work for me.
Old 03-14-2017, 06:40 AM
  #118  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Michael Yount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,107
Received 463 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Flaming indeed....
Old 03-14-2017, 10:55 AM
  #119  
TECH Resident
 
DW SD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 952
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

there are other companies that make adjustable racks like that. Have you searched around? I remember one that could rotate the input pinion to any angle.
Old 03-22-2017, 02:51 AM
  #120  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Coasttocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for your comments and replies.

Even though Flaming River was of no help, a little digging gives some answers.

I removed one of the boots and unscrewed the control arm from the shaft. Will be easy to fabricate a track bar to bolt onto each end and retain the boots. The track bar will allow me to pick my own tie rod length so I can keep to stock height and length. I ordered tubing and tube inserts to match the 14 x 1.5 mm threads of the tie rod ends, left and right threads to make my own tie rods. Unfortunately the only place I could find these was in the UK.

Of course I can't work on the steering until I solve the issue with the engine/trans installed height. I've been kind of putting this off as I hate to go backwards, but my mental picture was worse than the reality. Over the last two days I removed the master cylinder/brake booster, exhaust system (good thing I made it where it just slides off the isolation brackets after unbolting from the manifolds), and unbolted it from the mounts, modified the trans mount, welded up 1 1/4" "shims" for the front motor mounts, and have everything back as before less the exhaust. Now the bottom of the oil pan is flush with the crossmembers. In total I raised the engine 1 1/4" at the front mounts and the tail,of the trans by 7/8".

No downside to the move, except for the master cylinder. But several positive items. Under the hood the new height looks more right.

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1940.jpg

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1941.jpg

LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes-img_1942.jpg

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: LQ4/4L80 swap 1969 Mercedes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.