LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

13.93 with basically stock lt1 good or bad???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2012, 11:05 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
zboy2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Attica, IN
Posts: 269
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 13.93 with basically stock lt1 good or bad???
Ok so took the car to the track a couple weekends back and ran a 13.93 with just a CAI on a 95 z28 a4, what's everyone think. Is it good or bad? Should I be running better/worse?
zboy2012 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-05-2012, 11:38 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
3rdgen92maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oviedo,Fl/Fairbanks,AK
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
Sounds pretty good to me. Most stock a4 lt1 cars are in the low 14 high 13sec range.
3rdgen92maro is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-05-2012, 11:39 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
zboy2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Attica, IN
Posts: 269
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Ok because I've heard of some but not many running a couple tenths faster and didn't know for sure what most basically stock lt1's ran
zboy2012 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-08-2012, 02:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
moge11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Champaign IL
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
what was your mph and 60'?
moge11 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-08-2012, 02:31 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
transamtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Niagara Falls Ont. Canada
Posts: 640
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default
My 94 TA GT A4 went 14.01 at 98mph with a 2.01 60ft back in the spring of 1996.

That was bone stock full weight 1/2 tank of gas on the 16" Goodyear GSC's with 18,000 miles.
transamtom is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-10-2012, 11:51 AM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
zboy2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Attica, IN
Posts: 269
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by moge11
what was your mph and 60'?
My 60' was 2.0039 and MPH was 99.74
zboy2012 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-10-2012, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
zboy2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Attica, IN
Posts: 269
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by transamtom
My 94 TA GT A4 went 14.01 at 98mph with a 2.01 60ft back in the spring of 1996.

That was bone stock full weight 1/2 tank of gas on the 16" Goodyear GSC's with 18,000 miles.
Mine had a full tank of gas and just the CAI. With no spare or jack due to it not coming with the car when I purchased it and 16" Kumho's
zboy2012 is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 09-10-2012, 01:40 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
transamtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Niagara Falls Ont. Canada
Posts: 640
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by zboy2012
Mine had a full tank of gas and just the CAI. With no spare or jack due to it not coming with the car when I purchased it and 16" Kumho's
Headers,rear seat and spare delete plus a mail order tune got me almost 3/10's.
transamtom is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-12-2012, 01:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default
sounds strong to me.

my 2000 a4 bolt on ls1 car went 14.1 @ 101 bone stock.
s346k is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-12-2012, 06:41 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
transamtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Niagara Falls Ont. Canada
Posts: 640
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by s346k
sounds strong to me.

my 2000 a4 bolt on ls1 car went 14.1 @ 101 bone stock.
Your up in the mountains,you need to use the DA correction factor to get your time at sea level.
transamtom is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-16-2012, 04:49 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default
Originally Posted by transamtom
Your up in the mountains,you need to use the DA correction factor to get your time at sea level.
umm no. i was at irp in central indiana. da was around 2k'. not saying it's normal. the car was painfully slow. after doing bolt-ons it ended up trapping 111+ in the same conditions.
s346k is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-17-2012, 06:36 AM
  #12  
11 Second Club
 
prokilllsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ohio
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
My 95 Z went 13.95 at 101 stock and my Dad's 94 Z went 13.94 at 100.5 stock.
prokilllsx is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-25-2012, 05:05 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
 
joelster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,630
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts

Default
Some a4 cars came with 3.23's most of them came with **** 2.73's. If you can pull the shifter all the way back into first it has 3.23's if it stops at 2nd you have 2.73's.
joelster is offline  
Reply Like
Old 09-25-2012, 05:46 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default
Pretty stout for a near stock car!
Beau@SDPC is offline  
Reply Like
Tags
Back to Subforum
Drag Racing Results
View Next Unread
stock a4 camaro times 1/8th




Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 13.93 with basically stock lt1 good or bad???


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.