Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2002, 04:59 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Jahel'98COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

More details on the 2003 Kenne Bell COBRA can be found on the following thread:

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthr...hreadid=179399

If I am not mistaken, a well tuned 422 ci LS1 with all the bolts ons (LS6 heads/intake, headers, etc.) will make around 550 rwHP and 550 rwTQ at the rear wheels.

With respect to cost, it looks like the 2003 Kenne Bell COBRA and a 422 ci LS1 will offer similar bang for the buck.
Old 10-09-2002, 07:00 PM
  #2  
LEO
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
LEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: HOU - yeah, you know the rest.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Most well tuned 422's make closer to 500 rwhp, 550 rwhp is more like a solid-roller set up.
Old 10-09-2002, 07:44 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

600 HP w/o headers or ORP is awesome if the story is right.
Old 10-09-2002, 07:56 PM
  #4  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,653
Received 1,099 Likes on 721 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

That's a lot of power but 16-20 lbs of boost is a lot of boost, I'm more impressed (if) the block can take it for a year or so MORE so than the power I have a buddy who could make that power on 12 lbs of boost and on race gas in a 357ci LT1 with a supercharger. 20 lbs of boost is what mid 9 second cars run.
Old 10-09-2002, 09:30 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

I hate to say i told you so, but wait until someone stuffs a large turbo atop of one these basically built from the factory motors. More power on the way. Although you are only a relatively small shot and about 800 bucks away from 800rwhp with the 422..... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

<small>[ October 09, 2002, 09:33 PM: Message edited by: cantdrv65 ]</small>
Old 10-10-2002, 10:42 AM
  #6  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 19 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Pretty cool! The new Cobras have alot of potential, too bad there really isn't any support on modifying the engines internally. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />

I've seen Supras pull over 750 rwhp with a stock shortblock. 3.0L and 6-cylinders, so this 4.6L V8 should be able to do that and more with a turbo setup.

-Tony
Old 10-10-2002, 02:49 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Jahel'98COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Pro Stock John:
<strong>That's a lot of power but 16-20 lbs of boost is a lot of boost, I'm more impressed (if) the block can take it for a year or so MORE so than the power I have a buddy who could make that power on 12 lbs of boost and on race gas in a 357ci LT1 with a supercharger. 20 lbs of boost is what mid 9 second cars run.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">John, the car was running 16 pounds of boost. 2003 COBRAs making 12 pounds put about 500 HP to the rear wheels. The block's longevity shouldn't be an issue, as it is made of iron. Everything else in the motor is forged from the factory, save for the aluminum heads.
Old 10-11-2002, 12:26 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
bigSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: PURDUE
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Great, I spend a grand and get 330rwhp, they spent a grand and they get 500rwhp.
<img border="0" alt="[guns]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_guns.gif" /> Cobra
Old 10-11-2002, 07:18 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Jahel'98COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by bigSS:
<strong>Great, I spend a grand and get 330rwhp, they spent a grand and they get 500rwhp.
<img border="0" alt="[guns]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_guns.gif" /> Cobra</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Not necessarily. Spend a grand on an 150 shot N2O setup with all the safety bells and whistles, and you will see in excess of 400 rwHP and 500 rwTQ easily. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Old 10-11-2002, 07:56 PM
  #10  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by bigSS:
<strong>Great, I spend a grand and get 330rwhp, they spent a grand and they get 500rwhp.
<img border="0" alt="[guns]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_guns.gif" /> Cobra</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You spent your grand in the wrong places <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

Impressive for the Cobra, I do have a good bit of respect for these cars compared to the earlier year 4.6's...
Old 10-14-2002, 11:12 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
Matt Sterbator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

The Supra's I-6 configuration helps it hold up to the power.
Old 10-16-2002, 12:48 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
JoSeY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Your Reality Check Bounced...
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

What amazes me is these guys are nutting over 550rwhp @ 20lbs of boost thru a 32V V8 motor.....whooooopty friggin dooo.....the 93 Supra's with a single turbo upgrade can be made to hold 900rwhp on a BONE STOCK BOTTOM END...detroit is light years behind period. The LS1 Heads are a Warp jump compared to what else is coming out...now if GM put the LS1/LS6's together with an Iron block, steel crank, forged rods/pistons and pushrods that weren't made from toothpicks nothing Ford or any of the Japanese cars could touch it.....

I would pay anything to see what Frod and the rest would say if GM would put a motor like that together and supply a blower from the factory...geez that would be crazy sick power.
Old 10-16-2002, 01:14 AM
  #13  
Launching!
 
Stefan D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Hey Josey, well said. Its only taken ford about 5 years to figure how to make a 32 valve motor work, well sort off, its a pig naturally aspirated so lets put a blower on it and hey were a regular bunch of rocket scientists. I will take a LS-1 car, a bunch of bolt ons and some spray and run that **** over. And you know what if the bottle goes empty I will still be some where in the high 11s, low 12s <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> . Any of those Cobra guys want to disconnect the blower belt <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> ?????
Old 10-16-2002, 05:30 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

Josey....just FYI...."IF" doesn't cut the mustard. "IF" GM did this and "IF" GM does that...what's the point?

As for how much the stock bottom end of the 4.6 will hold remains to be seen. Do you know? If so, please tell us. I don't know, and won't pretend to know.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Any of those Cobra guys want to disconnect the blower belt </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sure...whatcha got? I've got one of those naturally aspirated pigs they made before the 03.

<small>[ October 16, 2002, 06:45 AM: Message edited by: Bob Cosby ]</small>
Old 10-16-2002, 10:44 AM
  #15  
Launching!
 
Stefan D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

I have an LS-1 or LT-1. Both will run NA or on NOS and either one has ever lost to no mustang.
BRING THAT **** ON!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Old 10-16-2002, 10:57 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have an LS-1 or LT-1. Both will run NA or on NOS and either one has ever lost to no mustang.
BRING THAT **** ON!!!</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Of course. Another internet racer that has never lost to blah blah blah.

I don't do baby bottles...so what do those awesome cars run w/o the juice? Timeslips, please. If you have none of those, then excuses are welcomed too.

<img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />
Old 10-16-2002, 11:39 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fenris Ulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

I really doubt GM would want a supercharged LS1 from the factory without doing some major revisions to make sure customers won't have the problems you read about in the FI forum right now.
Old 10-16-2002, 01:45 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No internet racer here.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">LOL. Ok. I've made mistakes before. Where do race? Class race, or do you race for ET?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just giving you the facts.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I see. No personal opinions huh? Just facts? Ok. Whatever you say. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Both cars I can assure you run better than 11.85 on motor,on BFGs and better than 112.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Obviously the LT1 is way out of my league. No skin off my back, as it is hardly a bolt-on car. Congrats. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> How about the LS1? What does it run? Ever had it on the track? Ever had it on the track on DR's? Whats its best ET? I'm curious.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What a joke. I cant belive im replying to this in between going over my 9 second timeslips from my LT-1.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Oh, well, I'm very sorry for interupting such important work. Please, if you don't feel my posts are worth replying to, then don't bother. If I'm to far below you to waste your time, then why waste it?

Bueller?

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">But Bob dont get upset its just the truth 4.6s and 5.4s suck.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">This is one of those "facts", right? You know, I could make the same "factual statement" about and LT1 or even an LS1 using ET as an example. Would you like to hear? Probably not, so I'll digress and leave the playground talk to you.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Go buy a 5.0 and get rid of that girls car !!!!!!!!!</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A funny! I get it! Hey, in addition to my 'girlie car' (the one I traded a 99 T/A for), I have an 88 Coupe. It's a 5.0!!! Holy cow! I'm even the original owner! Can I be a man now!!!

<img border="0" alt="[Fluffy]" title="" src="graemlins/fluffy.gif" />

BTW...its a class racer these days, if you know what that is.

Have fun. Hey, do you have a webpage or anything? I'd like to check out your cars. Thanks.
Old 10-16-2002, 03:45 PM
  #19  
Z00
TECH Apprentice
 
Z00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

I'd bet my money on Bob in that race <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 10-16-2002, 11:45 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Jahel'98COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2003 Kenne Belle COBRA versus Bolt-On N/A 422 ci LS1

"I'd bet my money on Bob in that race "

I'd take Bob any day over Alfalfa, but I'm a bit biased <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

"What amazes me is these guys are nutting over 550rwhp @ 20lbs of boost thru a 32V V8 motor.....whooooopty friggin dooo.....the 93 Supra's with a single turbo upgrade can be made to hold 900rwhp on a BONE STOCK BOTTOM END...detroit is light years behind period. The LS1 Heads are a Warp jump compared to what else is coming out...now if GM put the LS1/LS6's together with an Iron block, steel crank, forged rods/pistons and pushrods that weren't made from toothpicks nothing Ford or any of the Japanese cars could touch it.....I would pay anything to see what Frod and the rest would say if GM would put a motor like that together and supply a blower from the factory...geez that would be crazy sick power.

Correction: 613 rwHP and 600 rwTQ on only 16 PSI of boost. And yes, I'm aware of what the Supra can do. Little do you realize that the 4.6 DOHC aluminum blocks made prior to 2003 can also support 800 rwHP, as proven by the likes of a few very hard-core modular racers. Oh yeah, all this GM would of and could have crap won't cut it...the Z28 and Firebird are history (for now), so please don't sing the praises of a utopian motor that GM doesn't even have the interest (or finances) to build.

"Hey Josey, well said. Its only taken ford about 5 years to figure how to make a 32 valve motor work, well sort off, its a pig naturally aspirated so lets put a blower on it and hey were a regular bunch of rocket scientists."

Yes, they are rocket scientists. This car, along with the Z06 are the hottest thing to hit the market ever since the Supra TT and LS1 were introduced in '93 and '98, respectively. A pig, N/A, I don't think so. There are numerous pre-2003 COBRAs with bolt-ons that run between 11.7's and 12.2's, and mind you, this isn't any breaking news.

"I will take a LS-1 car, a bunch of bolt ons and some spray and run that **** over. And you know what if the bottle goes empty I will still be some where in the high 11s, low 12s. Any of those Cobra guys want to disconnect the blower belt?????"

No, the 2003 COBRA owners will keep the blower belt on and let you read their rear plates as they accelerate past you with 613 rwHP of blue oval pride, regardless of whether or not you are spraying. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" /> And you can spray all you want all day long, but at the end of the day, the 2003's will still be ahead, and our forged short blocks will still be in one piece. I wish I could say the same about your unforged motor after a long day of successive N2O hits. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />

<small>[ October 16, 2002, 11:49 PM: Message edited by: Jahel'98COBRA ]</small>



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.