Anyone running faster then 11 flat with BMR torque arm?
#1
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (71)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Brady, Pa
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone running faster then 11 flat with BMR torque arm?
I'm looking for a torque arm and noticed that BMR says not to run their arm below 11 flat due to the tailshaft not being up to the task. What do all of you think of this?
#7
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Back home in Texas!!! (DFW)
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Anyone running faster then 11 flat with BMR torque arm?
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by theblur98ss:
<strong>Yes I'm talking about the regular length arm. I know the track pack heavy duty one will take it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've been using the stock torque arm with urethane bushing, though, after I shredded one of the bushings and wanked the mount bracket up a couple of weeks ago, I'll be changing to one that does not mount to the tailshaft. I found it by accident while putting the exhaust back on.
My 60' average is 1.44-1.46. Best has been a bunch of 1.42's. Take care.
<strong>Yes I'm talking about the regular length arm. I know the track pack heavy duty one will take it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've been using the stock torque arm with urethane bushing, though, after I shredded one of the bushings and wanked the mount bracket up a couple of weeks ago, I'll be changing to one that does not mount to the tailshaft. I found it by accident while putting the exhaust back on.
My 60' average is 1.44-1.46. Best has been a bunch of 1.42's. Take care.