9.783...in yucky weather.
11-30-2002, 04:26 PM
#1
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9.783...in yucky weather. Cecil County Today. Removed a little weight for a total race weight of 3294 lbs.
DA today was not good. Overcast skys (rained later in the day), high humidity and 51 degrees. We were right at sea level (0). I was down 1 MPH from last week. First pass out I spun to a 9.90 @ 136. Second pass out yielded a 9.82 @ 136.
Same thing as last week though, the track would not hold a launch off of the trans brake. When I tried that, it just spun the tires. All the 9 second passes were foot braking.
No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey1.wmv
Better Quality Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey1h.wmv
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey2.wmv
Better Quality Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey2h.wmv
I ran two other 9.78x passes and called it a day.
All-in-all a decent day. No accidents thank God.
Mikey
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 05:00 PM: Message edited by: mikey ]</small>
DA today was not good. Overcast skys (rained later in the day), high humidity and 51 degrees. We were right at sea level (0). I was down 1 MPH from last week. First pass out I spun to a 9.90 @ 136. Second pass out yielded a 9.82 @ 136.
Same thing as last week though, the track would not hold a launch off of the trans brake. When I tried that, it just spun the tires. All the 9 second passes were foot braking.
No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey1.wmv
Better Quality Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey1h.wmv
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey2.wmv
Better Quality Video: http://www.rapidmotorsports.com/978mikey2h.wmv
I ran two other 9.78x passes and called it a day.
All-in-all a decent day. No accidents thank God.
Mikey
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 05:00 PM: Message edited by: mikey ]</small>
11-30-2002, 04:32 PM
#2
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ONTARIO/CANADA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. Great runs Mike, glad to see that things have run great all year for you and even a bit better that I had expected!! Keep up the great effort. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
11-30-2002, 05:11 PM
#4
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. That's awesome, Mikey!!!! Makes me want a 9 second timeslip that much more! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
How are you launching off the transbrake? WOT with no 2-step? My car would never hook until I used the 2-step to bring the starting line RPM down to ~3800rpm or so. May be something you should look into. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
How are you launching off the transbrake? WOT with no 2-step? My car would never hook until I used the 2-step to bring the starting line RPM down to ~3800rpm or so. May be something you should look into. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
11-30-2002, 05:13 PM
#5
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Delaware
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. Congrats Mikey didnt know that was a new best I was there with the black third gen with the lil ATI
BTW that old bastid at the tree have a stick in the *** about the driver switch?
BTW that old bastid at the tree have a stick in the *** about the driver switch?
11-30-2002, 05:43 PM
#6
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. GeorgeC: I am foot breaking it. Only track that will hold the brake is Maple. I'll look into the 2 step, sounds like a good idea. The converter is stalling at 4900 so it's alot to ask the chassis to hold.
LSWon, Yeah we tried to put Steve Spohn in the car since he's 50 lbs lighter than me and they didn't like that too much. Wanted Steve to pay his $35.00 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Mikey
LSWon, Yeah we tried to put Steve Spohn in the car since he's 50 lbs lighter than me and they didn't like that too much. Wanted Steve to pay his $35.00 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Mikey
11-30-2002, 05:54 PM
#7
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. unreal <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
nice way to finish up the year
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 11:12 PM: Message edited by: strife ]</small>
nice way to finish up the year
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 11:12 PM: Message edited by: strife ]</small>
Trending Topics
11-30-2002, 06:00 PM
#8
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. AWESOME!!!! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Still at 3300 raceweight too hehehe <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 06:01 PM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
Still at 3300 raceweight too hehehe <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 06:01 PM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
11-30-2002, 06:23 PM
#9
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Nick Agostino:
<strong>Great runs Mike, glad to see that things have run great all year for you and even a bit better that I had expected!! Keep up the great effort. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thanks Nick. You all built one heck of a motor. Now let's talk about next season...haha.
<strong>Great runs Mike, glad to see that things have run great all year for you and even a bit better that I had expected!! Keep up the great effort. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thanks Nick. You all built one heck of a motor. Now let's talk about next season...haha.
11-30-2002, 07:44 PM
#10
Resident Grump
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Walker County Alabama
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mikey:
<strong>No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
Mikey</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well Mikey I was not going to post on your thread until you brought my name up so you more or less ask for it.
The third pass you had a
1.29 60ft
6.193 @ 109.79 1/8
4th pass you had a
1.35 60ft
6.207 @ 110.25 1/8
Question... How did you make up .05sec you lost in the 60ft time from run 3 to run 4 while only running .46 mph faster in the 1/8th. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> .05 sec at 60ft is like .15 or better in the 1/8 and your mph does not reflect enough of a change to do it. Sorry Mikey but that dog won't hunt.
PS... It can be explained... Just another day of timeslip racing. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
<strong>No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
Mikey</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well Mikey I was not going to post on your thread until you brought my name up so you more or less ask for it.
The third pass you had a
1.29 60ft
6.193 @ 109.79 1/8
4th pass you had a
1.35 60ft
6.207 @ 110.25 1/8
Question... How did you make up .05sec you lost in the 60ft time from run 3 to run 4 while only running .46 mph faster in the 1/8th. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> .05 sec at 60ft is like .15 or better in the 1/8 and your mph does not reflect enough of a change to do it. Sorry Mikey but that dog won't hunt.
PS... It can be explained... Just another day of timeslip racing. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
11-30-2002, 07:53 PM
#12
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mikey:
<strong>GeorgeC: I am foot breaking it. Only track that will hold the brake is Maple. I'll look into the 2 step, sounds like a good idea. The converter is stalling at 4900 so it's alot to ask the chassis to hold.
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Exactly!!! The hit to everything is much softer on a footbrake launch, so it hooks. The t-brake release is violent, and just overpowers the tires/chassis. The two-step would likely solve all of that. It may not gain you any ET over a footbrake launch (my car does the same numbers either way), but it would give you consistency and repeatability. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<strong>GeorgeC: I am foot breaking it. Only track that will hold the brake is Maple. I'll look into the 2 step, sounds like a good idea. The converter is stalling at 4900 so it's alot to ask the chassis to hold.
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Exactly!!! The hit to everything is much softer on a footbrake launch, so it hooks. The t-brake release is violent, and just overpowers the tires/chassis. The two-step would likely solve all of that. It may not gain you any ET over a footbrake launch (my car does the same numbers either way), but it would give you consistency and repeatability. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
11-30-2002, 07:59 PM
#13
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Joe Kizzire:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mikey:
<strong>No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
Mikey</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well Mikey I was not going to post on your thread until you brought my name up so you more or less ask for it.
The third pass you had a
1.29 60ft
6.193 @ 109.79 1/8
4th pass you had a
1.35 60ft
6.207 @ 110.25 1/8
Question... How did you make up .05sec you lost in the 60ft time from run 3 to run 4 while only running .46 mph faster in the 1/8th. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> .05 sec at 60ft is like .15 or better in the 1/8 and your mph does not reflect enough of a change to do it. Sorry Mikey but that dog won't hunt.
PS... It can be explained... Just another day of timeslip racing. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Give me a break Joe Jesus....
hmm lets see, better sixty, but maybe a shift that wasnt as clean or on the same rpm as before, different engine/tranny temp, A different DA between passes, any number of a HUNDRED things can explain the difference. Look at the video and STFU. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />
Chris
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 08:01 PM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mikey:
<strong>No changes at all to the motor. Still my little LS6 intake and TH-350 (that was for Joe...lol <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> )
Third pass looked like this.
60': 1.299 That felt great!
1/8: 6.193
MPH: 109.79
1/4: 9.789
MPH: 136.07
Next pass yielded a new best shifting at a slightly lower rpm.
60': 1.350
1/8: 6.207
MPH: 110.25
1/4: 9.783
MPH: 136.88
Mikey</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well Mikey I was not going to post on your thread until you brought my name up so you more or less ask for it.
The third pass you had a
1.29 60ft
6.193 @ 109.79 1/8
4th pass you had a
1.35 60ft
6.207 @ 110.25 1/8
Question... How did you make up .05sec you lost in the 60ft time from run 3 to run 4 while only running .46 mph faster in the 1/8th. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> .05 sec at 60ft is like .15 or better in the 1/8 and your mph does not reflect enough of a change to do it. Sorry Mikey but that dog won't hunt.
PS... It can be explained... Just another day of timeslip racing. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Give me a break Joe Jesus....
hmm lets see, better sixty, but maybe a shift that wasnt as clean or on the same rpm as before, different engine/tranny temp, A different DA between passes, any number of a HUNDRED things can explain the difference. Look at the video and STFU. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />
Chris
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 08:01 PM: Message edited by: Chris ARE 360 ]</small>
11-30-2002, 08:27 PM
#17
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. Holy smokes, that's flying. Congrats!
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
11-30-2002, 08:53 PM
#18
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. Lighten up old guy...I was havin some fun with ya. I changed the shift points to 6600 and the car pulled harder through the gears. Doesn't seem to like being shifted at 7000 with the LS6 intake. Long story, but I bearly make through the traps with the 4.33 gear so I was letting the shift light on a while before I pulled the shift. Wish I could have got another 1.299 60' after changing the pill but alas the rains came.
11-30-2002, 08:55 PM
#19
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Joe Kizzire:
<strong>Cris the numbers tell the story... sorry <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please explain...I don't understand what you are getting at? Do you? Were you there today Joe? Guess I should have looked in the bushes...lol
FWIW, hazing the tires will result in this too.
Honestly, I wish I knew. Guess I need to scan the time slips...haha
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 08:58 PM: Message edited by: mikey ]</small>
<strong>Cris the numbers tell the story... sorry <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please explain...I don't understand what you are getting at? Do you? Were you there today Joe? Guess I should have looked in the bushes...lol
FWIW, hazing the tires will result in this too.
Honestly, I wish I knew. Guess I need to scan the time slips...haha
<small>[ November 30, 2002, 08:58 PM: Message edited by: mikey ]</small>
11-30-2002, 09:00 PM
#20
Resident Grump
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Walker County Alabama
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 9.783...in yucky weather. </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mikey:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Joe Kizzire:
<strong>Cris the numbers tell the story... sorry <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please explain...I don't understand what you are getting at? Do you? Were you there today Joe? Guess I should have looked in the bushes...lol</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No Mikey you posted the numbers so you explain it.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Joe Kizzire:
<strong>Cris the numbers tell the story... sorry <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please explain...I don't understand what you are getting at? Do you? Were you there today Joe? Guess I should have looked in the bushes...lol</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No Mikey you posted the numbers so you explain it.