403 rwhp LS1 with stock exhaust manifolds and mild cam - LS1TECH

Log In 


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

403 rwhp LS1 with stock exhaust manifolds and mild cam

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-13-2009, 06:51 PM   #1
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default 403 rwhp LS1 with stock exhaust manifolds and mild cam

This was a very cool project. Ray Pesek from Port O'Connor Texas has a gorgeous 1937 Ford Business Coupe that he put a bone stock '99 LS1 in. I tuned it and it made 332rwhp/347rwtq. Ray decided he wanted more power, but he didn't want to spend too much and he had to keep the factory exhaust manifolds.

With help from Geoff from Engine Power Systems, we formulated a budget sleeper approach. We would add bone stock 243 heads (unported and unmilled), add Comp 918 beehive springs, swap the LS1 intake for an LS6 intake and make a custom cam using Engine Power Systems custom EPS lobes. These lobes have been making incredible power with beehive springs. The way this motor revs is a thing of beauty. Cam specs are 218/230 .595"/.600" 115LSA +4 advance. The new power was 403rwhp/392rwtq. A gain of 71rwhp and 45 rwtq.

Keep in mind, we were pulling a 7 KPa vacuum at WOT on the dyno. If we had a better airbox, there's probably 10 more rwhp there. Here are some photos of the car with the front fenders off. The confined space meant that Ray had to run a fairly restrictive airbox assembly as the clearance between the TB and radiator is very tight. Like I said, very cool car and it revs to the moon. We gained over 100 rwhp at 6100 rpm.





Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 06:53 PM   #2
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
ItzQuik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hamilton al
Posts: 102
Default

nice numbers .... i mean really nice numbers!!!!!
ItzQuik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 07:09 PM   #3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manchester, CT
Posts: 2,139
Default

I like the fact that it looks like you gained a solid 30 foot pounds down at 2200 RPM, and just continued to gain more and more all the way through the RPM range...thats sweet.
Mike454SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 07:16 PM   #4
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
RacerXLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NWI
Posts: 1,266
Default

Damn nice job!!!
RacerXLs1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 07:27 PM   #5
TECH Fanatic
 
00T\A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NW Houston,TX
Posts: 1,286
Default

Very Nice.
00T\A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 10:21 AM   #6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,723
Default

I bet some LS7 manifolds would work nicely and pick up some power. That might be close to header money though...
jmilz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 10:45 AM   #7
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Cost wasn't a big reason why Ray chose to stick with manifolds, fitment was. Take a look at the photos and you'll see there is very little room. Besides, there probably aren't too many manufacturers producing LS1 headers for '37 Fords.

Custom headers would be about the only way to go. 400rwhp was a goal I had for the project and I'm pleased that we were able to gain so much with $500 heads, a $300 intake manifold, a $390 custom cam and $189 springs. That's a big power gain without a big investment. Street manners are wonderful too.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 11:29 AM   #8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
 
98camaroLS1M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,372
Default

Wow, well done!!!
98camaroLS1M6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 12:13 PM   #9
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,632
Default

Sweet, I love those mid 30s Ford 2 doors. Nice setup, simple and effective
PREDATOR-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:12 PM   #10
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Default

Good Job. That coupe should scoot!

243s are great heads, especially if someone doesn't screw them up trying to make them better.

If Vette cast iron manifolds fit they are even better.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...est/index.html

Jon
Old SStroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 12:51 PM   #11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick G View Post
Cost wasn't a big reason why Ray chose to stick with manifolds, fitment was. Take a look at the photos and you'll see there is very little room. Besides, there probably aren't too many manufacturers producing LS1 headers for '37 Fords.

Custom headers would be about the only way to go. 400rwhp was a goal I had for the project and I'm pleased that we were able to gain so much with $500 heads, a $300 intake manifold, a $390 custom cam and $189 springs. That's a big power gain without a big investment. Street manners are wonderful too.
plus the $450 tune right??? haha i had too
chrs1313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 01:33 PM   #12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,526
Default

Damn Patrick, my 2000 frc with a lg pro longtubes and a few other bolt ons with the g5x3 cam only made 400 rwhp 380 rwtq. That baby cam really works well. How do the numbers on your dyno compare to LG's ?? Just trying to guage whether they are generous, on par, or stingy. I just can't believe how much power the 243 headed, baby cam and no headers did. WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
allngn_c5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 02:00 PM   #13
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Lickeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 405
Default

Nice I was wanting to do a sort of mild cam and this looks like it fits the bill

What's the deal with EPS lobes?
What drivetrain? M6?

Would you change anything on that cam with the addition of longtubes?

Last edited by Lickeyman; 06-15-2009 at 02:38 PM.
Lickeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 02:55 PM   #14
Closed ex-Sponsor Account
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 443
Default

The design goal of this new lobe design was to have the superior acceleration characteristics of older cam lobe designs that have long been proven to make power, but do it in a more controlled, smoother manner.

This lobe design gives us the best of both worlds: Good acceleration with superior control. What this means is that these lobes are typically capable of turning more RPM and making more horsepower than older designs for a given lift and duration. Along with this, another plus of this design is improved durability as compared to older lobe designs, because of the superior control characteristics.

These lobes were designed to be VERY friendly using beehive springs. It is no longer mandatory to use a double spring that typically is going to cost more and be more difficult to install as compared to a lightweight beehive spring.

Additionally, with the correct lifter preload and the beehive springs, this design makes for a quiet install that doesn't have most of the 'sewing machine' noise associated with most LSX cam installs.

This is just one more test showing that these lobes are living up to their design goals.
Geoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:00 PM   #15
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Lickeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff View Post
The design goal of this new lobe design was to have the superior acceleration characteristics of older cam lobe designs that have long been proven to make power, but do it in a more controlled, smoother manner.....................
Thanks for the fast response.

As soon as I get my heads done you'll probably be hearing from me.
Lickeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:11 PM   #16
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
firefighter813x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 862
Default

Nice job Pat G. Man, I wish I had all of this knowledge when I started to mod. I would have saved mucho $$.
firefighter813x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 03:13 PM   #17
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,421
Default

wow, thats seriously impressive. GREAT work
WSsick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 04:06 PM   #18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (126)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,828
Default

very impressive!
is there a grind number for this cam?
so the scr was around 10.5:1?
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 04:17 PM   #19
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NemeSS View Post
very impressive!
is there a grind number for this cam?
so the scr was around 10.5:1?
The cam uses custom lobes that are only available from Geoff at Engine Power Systems. Call him at 225-751-8500. He can grind you the exact cam or one similar depending on your needs. I am still amazed how well these lobes work with beehive springs.

SCR was 10.5:1 (just like an LS6).
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 04:55 PM   #20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (37)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 6,438
Default

Nice numbers.

It makes me wanting 400rwhp out of a full bolt on car and a TR230 cam silly.

LilJayV10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thumper style cam swap gains big on LS2 Vette Patrick G Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 26 06-02-2011 02:27 AM
ARH 1 7/8" headers, Vararam, tune add 57rwhp, 59 rwtq to G8 Patrick G Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 20 03-25-2010 10:03 PM
No BS dyno test of Vararam CAI for G8 Patrick G Pontiac G8 2008-09 & Chevrolet SS 2014+ 17 08-16-2009 11:07 PM
No BS dyno test of Vararam CAI for G8 Patrick G Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 24 08-13-2009 11:49 PM
AFR 205 heads + T-Rex + stock LS1 shortblock = 502rwhp NA Patrick G Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 53 02-24-2009 07:39 PM


Tags
2257518500, 98, cam, exhaust, install, ls1, ls7, manifold, manifolds, mild, nj, patrick, pictures, rwhp, service, stock

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.