Newest Dyno Numbers 2005 CTS-V
08-22-2009, 12:32 PM
#3
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Land and Sea dyno. This dyno does read high, but using a baseline on this dyno with the tune from my last tuner to the tune that my curent tuner and i have worked on I have gained about 20whp/tq. If you use those gain numbers on the last dyno (Mustang Dyno) I am right around 380whp/376wtq on that Mustang dyno. I am trying to get back there to get some runs in to get a real comparison though.
Those are NA numbers.
Those are NA numbers.
08-22-2009, 12:46 PM
#4
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central ,CT
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Land and Sea dyno. This dyno does read high, but using a baseline on this dyno with the tune from my last tuner to the tune that my curent tuner and i have worked on I have gained about 20whp/tq. If you use those gain numbers on the last dyno (Mustang Dyno) I am right around 380whp/376wtq on that Mustang dyno. I am trying to get back there to get some runs in to get a real comparison though.
Those are NA numbers.
Those are NA numbers.
those are awsome numbers!
im just trying to compare my numbers to yours but seem like every dyno is diffrent....
08-22-2009, 12:49 PM
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basically yes. That is a very conservative Mustang dyno too. There were a few kinks in my tune that needed to be worked out and my tuner really stepped up to the plate and fixed everything. Now I get to keep datalogging myself and keep tweaking thins until I personally feel that it is perfect (probably never)
08-22-2009, 12:56 PM
#6
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central ,CT
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basically yes. That is a very conservative Mustang dyno too. There were a few kinks in my tune that needed to be worked out and my tuner really stepped up to the plate and fixed everything. Now I get to keep datalogging myself and keep tweaking thins until I personally feel that it is perfect (probably never)
Trending Topics
08-30-2009, 10:35 PM
#8
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central ,CT
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe im missing something here.....
but stock ls6 cts-v dynos around 330 on a dynojet maybe 315 on a mustang dyno
any with just headers ,catback , and ported T.B. you picked up ~ 60 hp ??
Seems to me like its just a very genorus dyno or its broken ....
anyone else think so ?
but stock ls6 cts-v dynos around 330 on a dynojet maybe 315 on a mustang dyno
any with just headers ,catback , and ported T.B. you picked up ~ 60 hp ??
Seems to me like its just a very genorus dyno or its broken ....
anyone else think so ?
08-31-2009, 04:55 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is a very generous dyno, but a gain of x hp is a gain of x hp...if I compare the gains with the new tune to my original Mustang dyno numbers I am making around 380whp +/- a few.
08-31-2009, 05:10 PM
#10
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central ,CT
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive just been doing alot of dyno sheet searching just cause im getting the idea I should of gone with just a slightly bigger cam ....
But it just seems like all the v #s are all over the place because of the diffrent dyno brands, and then even 2 mustang dynos are hard to comapre cause some are more stingy then others...
