PRC 227 Head / Torquer 3 Camshaft Results - LS1TECH

Log In 


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

PRC 227 Head / Torquer 3 Camshaft Results

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-28-2010, 05:04 PM   #1
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,223
Default PRC 227 Head / Torquer 3 Camshaft Results

Recently installed a set of 227 heads & Torquer 3 camshaft & thought I'd post the sheet. I dont have a baseline before because the car needed additional work before it could be run.
Car has a Dished 6.0l engine so we decided to put the small chamber 227 heads with the smaller chamber option on it to try to bring the compression up a little bit.

Mods Are:

Used 6.0l Engine
PRC 227 Small Chamber Heads (62cc)
Torquer 3 Camshaft
Fast 90mm Intake
Stock MAF
Stock Pulley
Long tubes & exhaust

Enjoy!!
Jason 98 TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 11:48 AM   #2
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,236
Default

Big power. I believe it. I've seen similar results with the PRC 227 heads myself.
Patrick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 12:52 PM   #3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,563
Default

Indeed big power for a stock U/Ds and MAF car. What size headers?

...killer H/C combo anyway!
Johnnystock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 03:00 PM   #4
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
MYSTIC-1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,274
Default

nice results.
MYSTIC-1SC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 05:04 PM   #5
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,577
Default

very nice gotta love the 6.0 tq
chrs1313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 11:12 PM   #6
TECH Resident
 
fatmat80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 876
Default

very impressive what is the cr u ended up with?
fatmat80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 08:50 AM   #7
LS1TECH Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,223
Default

It's right at 10.8 compression!

The moral of the story is even with the dished piston 6.0L you can make big big power with the right cylinder head!
Jason 98 TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 09:32 AM   #8
Launching!
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 274
Default

Nice! How are the PRC 227s compared to the PRC LS6 stg 2.5s?
427LS7HCI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 03:45 PM   #9
LS1Tech Platinum Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,991
Default

I'd expect about 15-20rwhp from the 227's over the Stage 2.5 LS6's on average.
Sales2@Texas-speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:48 AM   #10
Launching!
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed View Post
I'd expect about 15-20rwhp from the 227's over the Stage 2.5 LS6's on average.
Hs the 227s compare to TFS 215s?
427LS7HCI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 01:25 PM   #11
LS1Tech Platinum Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,991
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 427LS7HCI View Post
Hs the 227s compare to TFS 215s?
I haven't back to back tested those two...I'd expect them to be pretty close, with the 227's about 5hp or so up over the 215's.
Sales2@Texas-speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 02:40 PM   #12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed View Post
I haven't back to back tested those two...I'd expect them to be pretty close, with the 227's about 5hp or so up over the 215's.
I would love to see those results...why would you guess the TFS would be less...
chrs1313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 03:56 PM   #13
LS1Tech Platinum Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,991
Default

Extra valve and runner size are the two main reasons for that. And although we haven't back-to-back tested it, we have done enough dyno testing on both that we are very familiar with how they work and their usual results.
Sales2@Texas-speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 04:56 PM   #14
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 483
Default

impresive
LS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 06:57 PM   #15
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed View Post
Extra valve and runner size are the two main reasons for that. And although we haven't back-to-back tested it, we have done enough dyno testing on both that we are very familiar with how they work and their usual results.
since when does extra valve size and runner size translate to more hp...I bet Tony at afr would have to disagree too with his little 205s...
chrs1313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 06:39 AM   #16
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,182
Default

Very Nice Power!
Gordon0652 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:10 PM   #17
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,045
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrs1313 View Post
since when does extra valve size and runner size translate to more hp...I bet Tony at afr would have to disagree too with his little 205s...
Good point Chris. You can have more flow, bigger runner, and a bigger valve but that doesn't always mean more horsepower, especially if the coefficient of discharge has dropped. I'm not saying that's the case here, but just something to keep in mind.
Paint_It_Black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:48 PM   #18
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
hivoltagedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 531
Default

These heads are awesome. Too bad they take so damn long to get. SNL waited damn near 2 months for mine. I just got the car back last weekend.
hivoltagedriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2011, 11:44 PM   #19
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls1fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 35
Default

I currently have an ls1.....ms3cam..pace setter longtubes,fast 92,90mm tb,hooker exhaust, and ported ls6 heads...im looking for some heads that will make great power and that will go great with bottle as well.....

What heads will go better with this set up? the prc 215s
or the 227s...expected gains?
Ls1fury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 02:13 PM   #20
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,534
Default

I know this is over a year old but I figured this would have made more in the 480 range... my 317 headed ls2 made 463.. Wonder if id lose hp buying these heads havent heard much about the prc 227's

Last edited by 1nasty86; 10-11-2011 at 02:19 PM.
1nasty86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
227/235 .639 .621 114lsa+2 camshaft PwrdbyLS1 Parts Classifieds 2 12-03-2015 06:48 AM
PRC 227/F-14 Cam/Fast 102 Setup For Stock Bottom End (With Dyno Numbers) usafcrewchief01 Generation III Internal Engine 86 04-27-2011 06:43 PM
PRC 227 heads F/S hivoltagedriver Parts Classifieds 6 01-29-2011 01:05 PM
PRC 227 Heads Now Available In 60cc Chambers For Large Camshafts! Jon@Texas-Speed Generation III Internal Engine 12 09-05-2010 08:05 PM
PRC 227 Automatic Dyno Results Jason 98 TA Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 19 07-14-2010 07:12 AM


Tags
227, 440, boost, cam, cid, combo, dyno, head, heads, ms4, pcr, prc, results, speed, texas, tfs, torquer

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.