dyno numbers for slp 1.85 rockers
03-01-2004, 05:00 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dyno numbers for slp 1.85 rockers had ls1speed change out the rocker arms on my formula, heres the numbers.
stock rocker arms, 289.8 max torque 311.6
slp rocker arms, 298.0 max torque 328.6
cars only mods are lid and flowmaster and now slp 1.85 rockers arms.
ill post the graph once i get it scanned
stock rocker arms, 289.8 max torque 311.6
slp rocker arms, 298.0 max torque 328.6
cars only mods are lid and flowmaster and now slp 1.85 rockers arms.
ill post the graph once i get it scanned
Trending Topics
03-01-2004, 06:43 PM
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp
swap them out and get a new cam 
i find that pretty funny seeing as how you were such a propenent for these rockers
i find that pretty funny seeing as how you were such a propenent for these rockers
03-02-2004, 12:28 AM
#15
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Needville, TX
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am glad you posted as I have thought about these myself. Trying to maximize the RWHP without a Cam, Heads, etc... The HP you gained is right on the money as far as what I learned about these and the TQ gain is actually about twice what I would have expected.
They aren't going to win any 'Bang-for-the-Buck' votes - but you should have known that up front. They are to maximize a stock or stealth cam - pretty much anyway.
Two simple questions - #1 If you install these Rockers and Chromoly Push-rods, etc. - do you still qualify as "Internally Stock"? I would think you wouldn't - but this may actually be considered a "bolt-on" mod? Can anyone clarify this? #2 Would the 1.85 Rockers change the idle - maybe give a bit more "lope" to the engine? Thanks...
They aren't going to win any 'Bang-for-the-Buck' votes - but you should have known that up front. They are to maximize a stock or stealth cam - pretty much anyway.
Two simple questions - #1 If you install these Rockers and Chromoly Push-rods, etc. - do you still qualify as "Internally Stock"? I would think you wouldn't - but this may actually be considered a "bolt-on" mod? Can anyone clarify this? #2 Would the 1.85 Rockers change the idle - maybe give a bit more "lope" to the engine? Thanks...
03-02-2004, 06:05 AM
#16
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1999Daytona500PaceCar
I am glad you posted as I have thought about these myself. Trying to maximize the RWHP without a Cam, Heads, etc... The HP you gained is right on the money as far as what I learned about these and the TQ gain is actually about twice what I would have expected.
They aren't going to win any 'Bang-for-the-Buck' votes - but you should have known that up front. They are to maximize a stock or stealth cam - pretty much anyway.
Two simple questions - #1 If you install these Rockers and Chromoly Push-rods, etc. - do you still qualify as "Internally Stock"? I would think you wouldn't - but this may actually be considered a "bolt-on" mod? Can anyone clarify this? #2 Would the 1.85 Rockers change the idle - maybe give a bit more "lope" to the engine? Thanks...
They aren't going to win any 'Bang-for-the-Buck' votes - but you should have known that up front. They are to maximize a stock or stealth cam - pretty much anyway.
Two simple questions - #1 If you install these Rockers and Chromoly Push-rods, etc. - do you still qualify as "Internally Stock"? I would think you wouldn't - but this may actually be considered a "bolt-on" mod? Can anyone clarify this? #2 Would the 1.85 Rockers change the idle - maybe give a bit more "lope" to the engine? Thanks...
Last edited by 4mula; 03-02-2004 at 07:57 AM.
03-02-2004, 06:08 AM
#17
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp
did you do any tuning or anything or just install and dyno? you atap and make sure nothing unusual shows up?
its was dyno, install and dyno. im gonna have my buddy who works at a dealership look at it.
not having headers is hurting results also.
03-02-2004, 07:35 AM
#18
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You would probably have seen more gain if you had headers and perhaps a better flowing exhaust. I assume you still have cats.
With your listed mods that's really not a bad gain. A larger cam would have been a cheaper way to go however.
With your listed mods that's really not a bad gain. A larger cam would have been a cheaper way to go however.
03-02-2004, 07:58 AM
#19
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Larry
You would probably have seen more gain if you had headers and perhaps a better flowing exhaust. I assume you still have cats.
With your listed mods that's really not a bad gain. A larger cam would have been a cheaper way to go however.
With your listed mods that's really not a bad gain. A larger cam would have been a cheaper way to go however.
