Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Well the numbers are in....

Old 01-20-2012, 06:07 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Well the numbers are in....

Well after doing some mods on my '06 GTO: PRC 215 cnc ported heads, Comp Cams V3, Kooks headers 1 7/8, Fast #46 injectors, Wilson Manifolds fuel rails, Texas speed ported oil pump, double roller timing chain, Edelbrock two piece timing cover and K&N cold air intake.
Stock intake, TB, coils & wires.

On the Dynojet it made: 436/ 395 to the rear wheels.

How would you rate the increase for what I have done? This was my first time modding an LSx engine.

Thanks for your comments.
Old 01-20-2012, 06:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (34)
 
outkast6991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: lancaster,pa
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A4 or m6? Honestly the numbers seem low. Do you have a baseline number? Dynos are just tools but I would have thought it would have been higher
Old 01-20-2012, 07:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
reeperz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Numbers seem on par to me but dynos are a tuning tool see what it can do at the track!!! If you are running a stock ls2 intake a cheap way to feed those nice heads would be porting the intake or picking up a fast intake. Should pick up some nice gains.
Old 01-20-2012, 08:36 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
caviness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liberty,NC
Posts: 698
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I don't think that bad for a auto car if you're auto
Old 01-20-2012, 09:27 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (14)
 
Squirts11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 898
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The numbers do seem lower than I would have expected, but did you have baseline numbers before the build? If you're looking for a bit more power, a plate kit with a small shot (75-100hp) would be waaay more bang for your buck vs a FAST since you'd need a retune anyway.

Last edited by Squirts11; 01-20-2012 at 09:37 PM.
Old 01-21-2012, 01:07 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah, I didn't have the time to get a baseline run. The car is M6, and drives good. I'm just not sure what numbers it should run with this set up? Everyone says they are low numbers, but can someone show me similar set ups and their numbers as a comparison?
This is my daily driver and what it is, is what it is. I don't care if I'm down some HP, all I care about it that it's a little bit better than stock.
Old 01-21-2012, 02:24 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Comp cam V3 spec?
Numbers seems on par, for a stock intake and TB. FAST 102mm would be a killer mod on your combo..20rwhp+ right there IMO. LS2 intake suck.
Old 01-21-2012, 02:58 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

+1 for cam specs
Old 01-21-2012, 04:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (34)
 
outkast6991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: lancaster,pa
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For a comparison my 6.0 with stock runner 243' s, 230/242 cam, and a ls6 intake put down 435/420 on a dj. With a 92/92 it made 465/435
Old 01-21-2012, 06:28 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

V3 cam @.050 231/234 ---.644/.598 LSA 111°
Old 01-21-2012, 06:48 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Stock intake is killing it.
Old 01-21-2012, 07:23 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
5w20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston , Tx
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

stock intake = LS2 intake or air box?
Old 01-21-2012, 10:28 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

it has a K&N CAI. I'd change intakes if I could find a Fast on the cheap. But really for the money, how much more HP will that give me?
I'd rather save up and build up a completely different engine, 427 or something close to that. RHS block, Lunati crank, Carrillo rods, Weisco's or Diamond pistons, figure a cam size, and some Mozes heads, with a sheet metal intake. I think that would be a good solid running engine.
I don't want to supercharge, turbo or nitrous it either. Just a nice N/A motor with some *****. I know that I could build it myself and be happy with what comes of it.
Maybe once I get tired of this set up, I'll start looking around for some deals for all of those other parts. Should be a fun one to build up.
Old 01-22-2012, 12:15 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
1dirtybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Scottsdale Az
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the graph is very smooth and power carries all the way never dropping off. The car also made over 300rwtq at 2k.

You should post the graph for sure man. That dyno dosent produce queens, just fast cars
Old 01-22-2012, 10:33 AM
  #15  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1dirtybird
the graph is very smooth and power carries all the way never dropping off. The car also made over 300rwtq at 2k.

You should post the graph for sure man. That dyno dosent produce queens, just fast cars


I don't' have a way to scan the dyno sheet.
Old 01-22-2012, 12:15 PM
  #16  
Launching!
 
bitterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you racing? Do you really need more then 430+ RWHP? I know the more you have the more you want but at some point traction is your limiting factor!

Bruce
Old 01-22-2012, 03:48 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,296
Received 857 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by outkast6991
For a comparison my 6.0 with stock runner 243' s, 230/242 cam, and a ls6 intake put down 435/420 on a dj. With a 92/92 it made 465/435
Wow that's a nice increase from the FAST.
Old 01-22-2012, 04:45 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (34)
 
outkast6991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: lancaster,pa
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LilJayV10
Wow that's a nice increase from the FAST.
yup i was surprised myself
Old 01-22-2012, 06:28 PM
  #19  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's my DD, I don't need more HP. Kinda like do we even need the cars we have? right? This is just a toy to me, if I can get some fun out of it then so be it. If I get 1200HP then that's cool too.
That is what life is all about, doing what pleases you. Who cares what other people think or do.
Old 01-22-2012, 08:04 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (34)
 
1999BlueTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Numbers seem low to me for a ls2 m6 with the mods listed above and a dynojet seem more like cam only numbers!!!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.