Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Stock internal LS1 N/A H.P. record breaker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:39 AM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Happy Dyno
Old 06-08-2012, 07:08 AM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
armyboyatc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 1,063
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
i think it's kind of silly to argue dyno sheets. the track is the tell-all. at the very least, the car cannot forge a powercurve. i think that is the most impressive thing. look at the tq curve...lt1 what? the power does seem to carry far too well past 6k to be on the stock springs, let alone a stock cam. but who am i to argue, i am not there to see the car or the parts inside of it.

good work using simple parts and getting results. go make some passes and let us know what it traps. i feel it should mph better than the numbers indicate given the curve. i've wanted to run an ls6 cam, vic jr, and e85 for years. this year i finally have the opportunity to do something so we shall see.

OP: i am very intersted in your setup and track results. good luck.
What I have learned is that the E85 will not greatly benefit you unless you have a power adder or higher compression. I would like to see a back to back comparison between 93 and E85 on a heads cam motor.

If someone produced more power than this then I want to see what they have done and where they picked up the power and why and also what their curve looks like. Not argue their results.

Thanks for the kind words. Track times will be coming soon.
Old 06-08-2012, 09:24 AM
  #43  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
10secZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: cape coral, fl
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol i have personally seen this car, driven this car, worked on this car you name it, it does not have a cam in it.
Old 06-08-2012, 10:06 AM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by armyboyatc
I would like to see a back to back comparison between 93 and E85 on a heads cam
Old 06-09-2012, 12:13 AM
  #45  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
98blueSScamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
Do it ******.....
Old 06-27-2012, 03:23 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
 
nmass399's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 1,244
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I made 372hp and 389ft/lbs stock internal, not sure how much the bad cylinder, bad valvesprings and 24 degrees of timing hurt it. Probably not that much. I was running vp109 in it. Dyno at holley lsfest whatever kind that was. Its crazy to see your graph keep pulling up top like that, if i was to just look at that without info i would assume its a bigger than stock cam.

Dyno's don't tell the whole story tho, timeslips will help to see if its got the power. The e85 is helping out with power similar to the vp109 i ran.
Old 06-27-2012, 05:38 PM
  #47  
Launching!
 
usmonaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if the older LS1's are anything to judge. I mean that is extremely good numbers to me if it was on 93oct only with a few bolt ons. My 04 M6 GTO put 386rwhp / 374rwtq with Torquer V.2 cam, PAC .650 springs and a K&N cai as the only non GM stock parts on the car. That's on 93oct.
Old 06-27-2012, 06:06 PM
  #48  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Fwiw Both A4 Bolt on car's i've had a hand in tuning personally, both made 347&352rwhp respectively on a Dynojet... Same dyno... One was 3500lbs went 11.7@114mph or so the other was 3Klbs and went 11.04@121mph... Oh btw the 352rwhp one was through a 9" and was a 98 Car w/ 130K miles... Congrats on your numbers.. But dyno's are tool's.. not benchmark's.. Run it at the track.. report back w/ your MPH... i'm guessing 116mph is about where your gonna fall...
Old 06-27-2012, 07:18 PM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
armyboyatc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 1,063
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
Fwiw Both A4 Bolt on car's i've had a hand in tuning personally, both made 347&352rwhp respectively on a Dynojet... Same dyno... One was 3500lbs went 11.7@114mph or so the other was 3Klbs and went 11.04@121mph... Oh btw the 352rwhp one was through a 9" and was a 98 Car w/ 130K miles... Congrats on your numbers.. But dyno's are tool's.. not benchmark's.. Run it at the track.. report back w/ your MPH... i'm guessing 116mph is about where your gonna fall...
Nice numbers..... I understand that dynos are just tuning tools. I was just posting up to show off the power that the Vic junior picked it up and the E85 gains. We are still workin some bugs out of it but track times will come soon.
Old 06-27-2012, 07:28 PM
  #50  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Honestly, I think your cars pretty strong, should be nice .. Just have fun..
Old 07-23-2012, 12:57 PM
  #51  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

and then
Old 07-25-2012, 05:56 AM
  #52  
Teching In
 
redcam622's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Springfield ,Ma
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 02 camaro 115k miles..ebay t/body,K&N filter,flowmaster muffler only..no cat back..on 87oct..cause i'm too cheap for 93. 353hp 347lb ft torque.
Old 08-03-2012, 09:30 PM
  #53  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
88blackiroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redcam622
My 02 camaro 115k miles..ebay t/body,K&N filter,flowmaster muffler only..no cat back..on 87oct..cause i'm too cheap for 93. 353hp 347lb ft torque.
Track tells all. As mentioned, dynos are only tuning devices.
OP did you ever make it to the track? That dyno sheet is very... impressive for stock internals.
Old 08-04-2012, 05:54 PM
  #54  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Dyno numbers are like fake ****...they look good but thier not the real thing!
Old 08-08-2012, 04:31 PM
  #55  
Teching In
 
redcam622's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Springfield ,Ma
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default dyno

actually..dyno #s are pretty acurate..assuming gear,converter, suspension, and tires are matched correctly...my car has a stock converter and 273s...so it comes out like a snail and gos through the traps in 3rd. at 107. w/26# tires @3700 lbs...With gear and converter...which wont change the dyno #s would expect mid 12s @110...Dynojet dyno #s tend to be a bit high because of the way they load..the mustang dyno has been dead nuts.
Old 08-09-2012, 09:14 AM
  #56  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Happy Dyno
No joke....nearly 400 rwhp with boltons? Most small-mid size cammed cars don't even get within 10hp of that.

This thread is worthless without track results IMO.
Old 08-09-2012, 01:18 PM
  #57  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
TransAmcoupe98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Happy Dyno
Someone finally said it lol.
Old 08-26-2012, 10:54 AM
  #58  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
maxpower_454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by armyboyatc
No heads, no cam, no built bottom end no nothing.
No heads, cam, bottom end, nothing??!!??? This is crazy power for just a bare block!!!!!



Quick Reply: Stock internal LS1 N/A H.P. record breaker?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 AM.