Torquer V3 and PRC Stage 2.5 LS6 heads on 2 different dynos - LS1TECH

Log In 


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Torquer V3 and PRC Stage 2.5 LS6 heads on 2 different dynos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2012, 08:10 AM   #1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Bramlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 636
Default Torquer V3 and PRC Stage 2.5 LS6 heads on 2 different dynos

Fbody car, full bolt ons, with V3 cam and PRC LS6 heads, LS6 intake, 1 7/8" headers with ORY and Corsa. M6 car with stock gearing. Originally tuned in 70* weather with low humidity on a dynojet and made 421hp/389tq. The tune is spot on. Perfect A/F ratio, perfect drivability.

I had the chance to strap in down at another shop and do a few pulls, also on a dynojet. On this day it was hot and humid. 97* and high humidity. The car with same mods put down 446hp/409tq.

The only problem at both shops is it started pulling vacuum as early as 3000rpm all the way to redline at 7000. They both said it was due to a restriction in the intake somewhere. Either the LS6 intake, the throttle body (ported stocker), stock MAF, SLP Lid or a combination of all of the above. I found this odd and I've never heard of this problem before. Both shops said with a better flowing intake system to expect even better numbers, and it would also stop pulling vacuum.

But I guess the bottom line is both shops are well known and it just shows how far off dyno numbers can be on any given dyno and day. If anything, my numbers should have been much lower on the hot and humid day. At this point I could give a **** about dyno numbers as long as the cars drives good and pulls hard, which is does.

And next time your bolt on, cam only car makes numbers like 440hp/410tq, take those readings with a grain of salt.
Bramlok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 09:46 AM   #2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,046
Default

With you setup I think a Fast intake would benefit you, but it's up to you if it's worth it, sounds like the car is running healthy.

You could do a GM 85mm maf with no screen or the wider mesh aftermarket screen for cheap and see if it helps some but you are likely just at the limit of the stock intake, especially in the higher RPM range.
thunderstruck507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 10:23 AM   #3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,708
Default

Quote:
I found this odd and I've never heard of this problem before.
It's not a problem, it's just how things are with engines and the laws of physics. Unless you have a ridiculous setup like NASCAR, you're always going to be pulling vacuum and have less pressure in your engine than outside.

Quote:
Both shops said with a better flowing intake system to expect even better numbers
Of course a better flowing intake system will make even better numbers, especially on a H/C car. A 2 year old could've told you that...
redtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 10:03 PM   #4
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 872
Default

Interesting results. My car was tuned on a pretty stingy dynojet, and I've wondered what it'd make on a different one. Dynos are just tools though, and track times are the ultimate barometer.

Jason
Camaro99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2012, 03:09 AM   #5
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Bramlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redtan View Post
It's not a problem, it's just how things are with engines and the laws of physics. Unless you have a ridiculous setup like NASCAR, you're always going to be pulling vacuum and have less pressure in your engine than outside.
Well, in my case it is a problem. I have enough of an intake restriction to where it's throwing MAP sensor codes when driving it hard. At WOT it's pulling 3" Hg which is more than acceptable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redtan View Post
Of course a better flowing intake system will make even better numbers, especially on a H/C car. A 2 year old could've told you that...
That was unnecessary. I don't know how many 2 year olds you talk tech with, but I have hard evidence and numbers that show that an LS6, ported stock TB and SLP lid are not enough in some cases and even can cause issues with certain setups. So for everyone that says an LS6 is good enough for a H/C cam setup, that may not always be the case. I know that now after getting in a few dyno runs, learning a few things and sharing my experience. I am not just basing my logic on "I could have told you so internet theory".

I'm getting off point here. My main point was to show that different dyno's can read a wide range of numbers when running the same car with same mods, under different temp and humidity conditions.
Bramlok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2012, 03:13 AM   #6
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Bramlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro99SS View Post
Interesting results. My car was tuned on a pretty stingy dynojet, and I've wondered what it'd make on a different one. Dynos are just tools though, and track times are the ultimate barometer.

Jason
Very true about track times and how it runs. It never hurts just for fun to throw in on another dyno just to see, if there is any discrepancy between dynos and numbers.
Bramlok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2012, 03:18 AM   #7
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Bramlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 636
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderstruck507 View Post
With you setup I think a Fast intake would benefit you, but it's up to you if it's worth it, sounds like the car is running healthy.

You could do a GM 85mm maf with no screen or the wider mesh aftermarket screen for cheap and see if it helps some but you are likely just at the limit of the stock intake, especially in the higher RPM range.
Yes, that's the plan down the line, maybe over the winter or next year. But for now, I just got it back together and want to drive it for the summer.
Bramlok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2012, 03:42 AM   #8
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 626
Default

You mentioned weather conditions during both dyno runs being different. Were the runs in Std or corrected configuration of the dyno's?.

If they were corrected runs then weather would have been factored & calculated, the runs would be comparable.

I always watch the torque numbers the dyno indicates, if you see inflated numbers that's a pretty good indicator.
ctd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2012, 10:23 AM   #9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 1,735
Default

Glad to see you finally got everything done....solid numbers!
BrntWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2012, 09:17 AM   #10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,046
Default

That seems odd that it's throwing codes with 3". IIRC mine was ~4 before the larger MAF and a bigger inlet air filter and the car ran fine. I haven't even checked it since then.

I might be confused on the measurement though. I compared the MAP reading with key on engine off to the reading at WOT. Started developing a discrepancy around 4k rpm.
thunderstruck507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2012, 09:55 AM   #11
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Bramlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 636
Default

Other than throwing the MAP code it runs fine. It will only throw the code if I drive it hard and repeatedly shift at around 6500rpm. If I shift at 6000-6200, it's fine and won't trigger the light.
Bramlok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2012, 01:22 AM   #12
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 109
Default

I just purchased same setup as you but have a fast 92 TB and ported 92 intake. Ill let you know when I get my car dynoed what the numbers are so maybe we can compare how much that LS6 is holding you back
smahlum_21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2012, 02:13 PM   #13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 1,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smahlum_21 View Post
I just purchased same setup as you but have a fast 92 TB and ported 92 intake. Ill let you know when I get my car dynoed what the numbers are so maybe we can compare how much that LS6 is holding you back

~20rwhp....I have that setup too and that's what I gained on the same dyno.
BrntWS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.3 Thirdgen, New cam, Heads, and Dyno Tune.. I think i lost power Mgg4591 PCM Diagnostics & Tuning 5 05-18-2015 09:30 AM
Vararam intake install + dyno numbers Bumblebee SS Gen 5 Camaro External Bolt-On Tech 9 02-05-2011 12:01 AM
2008 LS4 Dyno Tune Results Garou24 LS4 Performance 17 10-02-2009 05:29 PM
Best Weather to Dyno? H/C LS6Z Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 9 11-20-2005 05:34 PM
prelim sts #'s and info on the ultimate in tuning. (long) Blackbird Western Members 11 06-13-2005 06:14 PM


Tags
25, cam, car, day, dyno, heads, hot, humid, ls1, ls1tech, ls6, prc, stage, torquer, v3, worth

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.