Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

MY 2002 CORVETTE (PRC LS6 Heads and 228R Cam) DYNO TUNE! 450 RWHP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2012, 07:07 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MY 2002 CORVETTE (PRC LS6 Heads and 228R Cam) DYNO TUNE! 450 RWHP!

Well the moment we have all been waiting for! My 2002 Corvette with full exhaust and intake.

It previously dyno'ed a respectable number of 369 horsepower and 375 ft-lbs of torque. Respectable, but mistaken

Now with the PRC Stage 2.5 heads, decked for 11:5-1 compression and 228R 112 LSA camshaft the results were remarkable.

450 rear wheel horsepower! 444 ft-lbs of torque! How this car pulls....

The dyno sheet is below. Omit the green one, I think layne culver may have overlapped the wrong dyno...I don't know.

The Red is all mine though!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1st dyno with full intake and full exhaust.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------

2nd dyno with PRC Stage 2.5 LS6 heads, 228R Camshaft with 112 LSA.
Decked for 11:5-1 compression.
Comp rocker arm trunion upgrade.
LS7 lifters.
LS2 lifter trays.
LS2 timing chain.
Mellings high volume oil pump.
Redline raised to 6700 rpms.

Old 08-03-2012, 07:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I like those numbers since I have the same combo....But I don't believe dyno numbers...So many variables and some dynos rate high. I think 450/444 is too much power for that combo. Do you have a FAST 92/92 as well?

Take it to the track and get a trap speed.
Old 08-03-2012, 07:31 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
I like those numbers since I have the same combo....But I don't believe dyno numbers...So many variables and some dynos rate high. I think 450/444 is too much power for that combo. Do you have a FAST 92/92 as well?

Take it to the track and get a trap speed.
I agree, LS6 intake and TB.

The same dyno gave me 370 horsepower, the same dyno after mods gave me 450.

So by percentage. It made more peak power by 17 percent.
80 more horsepower out of heads and cam. Not bad!

How does it feel? About the same, until you hit 4000, then it hits you and instead of power dropping off after 5,500 this engine just keeps...on...going... All the way to 6,700 hard cut!

God forbid can I say it feels like VTEC from 4,000-6,500 rpms. It is pretty damn awesome how quick it gets to 60 from a stand still.
Old 08-03-2012, 07:32 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And true, I say just use the same dyno. It's just a reference device.

So if my car made 340 on a mustang dyno and 420 after heads and cam on a mustang dyno, then I guess its still 80 horsepower, whatever that unit may mean
Old 08-03-2012, 08:18 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
cowpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia / Kentucky
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cody,

Those are some stout numbers!!! Good Job dude...

You remarked that it felt the same until 4K rpm. My old C5 w/ TSP H/C 228R & PRC STG 2.5 5.3's always felt like it needed 3.90 or 4.11 gears to make it feel complete. But, job transfers, kids...blah, blah , blah...

How does your valve train sound?

Any cam surge?

What's your idle RPM (mine was 900-ish)

Cowpunk
Old 08-03-2012, 08:32 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cowpunk
Cody,

Those are some stout numbers!!! Good Job dude...

You remarked that it felt the same until 4K rpm. My old C5 w/ TSP H/C 228R & PRC STG 2.5 5.3's always felt like it needed 3.90 or 4.11 gears to make it feel complete. But, job transfers, kids...blah, blah , blah...

How does your valve train sound?

Any cam surge?

What's your idle RPM (mine was 900-ish)

Cowpunk
My idle Rpm's is around 900 to 1000, actually I need to look at that again, LOL.

Cam surge, define? (Is it like surging or hopping at near idle slow speeds?)

The valvetrain, in all honesty is very quiet, probably more quiet than it was before. .080 preload on LS7 lifters seems to the job very very very well!

My tuner anticipated power around 420-430, but 450 was alot, this could be because of the raised compression. From 10:5-1 to 11:5-1.

It definitely improves torque and horsepower through the powerband and the engine is made more responsive by the raised compression.

Anybody who plans to do this, do not cheap out. Upgrade oil pump, lifters, lifter trays, timing chain, rocker trunions, new torque to yield head and crankshaft bolts, and use GM multilayer steel head and exhaust manifold gaskets.

You will probably thank yourself later on when you never have to open the engine again, as many have due to split lifter trays or worse.

I love it. I really do!
Old 08-04-2012, 03:01 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
94Z28-MSTGKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Looks like my 99 SS is getting this setup! Any videos?
Old 08-04-2012, 09:53 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

All that matters is that you're happy with the results and the way the car drives. I love seeing people going with smaller cams and still making great numbers. Plus, you have what is called "ueseable power" and great low end torque that people who go with donkey dick cams don't.
Old 08-04-2012, 10:07 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
chevybayboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,293
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rise of the Phoenix
All that matters is that you're happy with the results and the way the car drives. I love seeing people going with smaller cams and still making great numbers. Plus, you have what is called "ueseable power" and great low end torque that people who go with donkey dick cams don't.
lmfao @ donkey Dick cam lol
Old 08-04-2012, 10:20 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I believe the horsepower but not the torque. Should run hard nonetheless.
Old 08-04-2012, 10:23 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Here's a very similar combo.. https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...l#post16588089
Old 08-04-2012, 10:51 AM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Will you get it to a drag strip? I know that isn't always possible for some folks. But it is a better way to measure real world power from the mph the car runs.
My C5 hasn't seen a dyno, I'm tuning it myself and ran 122 last evening. It's an A4 car. I have no idea what HP that is, but it's probably not 450 at the wheels.....
These were my first good runs, I believe there will be a little more with tuning and better weather conditions.

Ron
Old 08-04-2012, 11:23 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Cody,

Congrats!! Those numbers are great. What i love about your setup is that it is a simple setup, an off the shelf cam. You didnt spend $3000 in heads, or "Custom Spec" a magical cam that is supposed to do everything..

This is a simple combo.. Im sure the haters will say well dynos arent everything, and TSP/PRC heads arent top echelon heads that should be making that kind of power..lol

Great job.. I bet you didnt have a headache with that simple and yet effective combo..
Old 08-04-2012, 12:55 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, this was a fun undertaking...

From a young guy that got his start with the venerable roadster, the Mazda Miata.

I learned what I know working on those cars and applying it to the corvette was just a matter of changing the form a bit...

It feels good to see gains like this knowing you didn't have to go forced induction...
Old 08-04-2012, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Cody Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The corvette's y body platform was the closest thing I could get to the handling characteristics, balance, and feel of a lightweight roadster.

C5 platforms seem much stouter in appearance than the f body's.

It looks like a body on frame truck u know what I mean
Old 08-04-2012, 01:07 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

The C5 is amazingly stiff too. Jack the front up at the jack point and the rear nearly comes off the ground.

I wanted to learn the LS engines, and EFI. The Vette is quite a nice wrapper.

And guys, they aren't all that expensive. I piad $10k for mine with 78k on the clock last summer. All the parts in my .sig were bought used save for the cam and timing chain. Although the EPS cam isn't off the shelf, it was $20 more than the Comp.
Old 08-04-2012, 01:18 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
sweet99ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plains Ks
Posts: 1,907
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Great before and after numbers! Really gets me excited because this is the same setup I have been looking at for a long time now. It would be even cooler if you could get some track times with it!
Old 08-04-2012, 06:39 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

great numbers ! I have some new found respect for the 228r cam.I always though it was too mellow to produce such great numbers.
Old 08-05-2012, 04:33 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
94Z28-MSTGKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Anyone have an idea of how this cam would perform on a set of stock 243's. I'm about to pick up a set to replace my 853's.
Old 08-05-2012, 07:15 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
baxsom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rockledge FL
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djfury05
I started to link back to my post as well.

same heads 11:1 compression, same cam but a 114LSA with a +2 timing.
They did the LS7 lifters and LS2 trays with 7.375 pushrods and the comp upgraded trunions. the engine is quieter now than it was stock.

440/380 final numbers.


Quick Reply: MY 2002 CORVETTE (PRC LS6 Heads and 228R Cam) DYNO TUNE! 450 RWHP!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.