Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

As cast TFS 220/Stock LS6/Stock TB/1 x 3/4"/custom cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2012, 03:55 PM
  #1  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default As cast TFS 220/Stock LS6/Stock TB/1 x 3/4"/custom cam

Thought I'd share this with you guys...

This is a customers dyno graph from a set-up I specified for him. His wants were a "look at me idle" and as much usable power as possible without going overboard and run on pump 91 octane fuel.

His combination consists of:
As Cast 220cc TFS cylinder heads milled to produce 11.2:1-11.3:1 compression
Stock un-ported LS6 intake, stock throttle body, stock MAF
SLP Lid
Pacesetter 1x3/4" headers
TSP 3" True Duals
My custom camshaft: 234/239 .612/.610 112+3 LXL/HUC

Numbers ended up at 441rwhp and 409rwtq but take a look at the torque curve and the average power it made...


It hangs onto peak torque from 4600rpm to 5600rpm and the graph is peaky by no means. I would say that he is getting some valve float at 6200-6300rpm. We discovered after he got the camshaft that his springs were not the open and seat pressure that he thought they were, so I suggested to try and shim them for more seat pressure to ward off the valve float it looks like he is running into to that is keeping him from a little more top end hp.

Overall he is very happy with the cam and says that it pulls like a freight train. As you can see he gained nearly 130rwhp from just the head and cam swap alone and this was on a Eddy Current Dyno Jet.

He just picked up a Fast 102/92 set-up and we're hoping to see another 20rwhp from the intake swap to put him over 460rwhp on a stingier dyno, not as bad as a Mustang Dyno or Dyno Dynamics, but won't read as high as a non loaded Dyno Jet.

We're also contemplating a 85mm MAF, a 98mm lid, Chris1313 ram-air and an under drive pulley to put him well into the 475-480rwhp zone if not more.

All in all I am pretty pleased with the results and anyone else looking to duplicate this could easily best these numbers with a set of Kooks or ARH 1x7/8" headers, UDP, EWP and a set of CNC TFS 215's.

Thanks for looking and here is an idle clip

Old 09-17-2012, 05:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
fatmat80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

very nice results!!
what valve springs is the customer running?
Old 09-17-2012, 07:03 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatmat80
very nice results!!
what valve springs is the customer running?
I am honestly not sure, I will get with him and ask him to stick his head in here if he can.

I spoke with Brian Tooley earlier and he recommends 3/8" push rods while using his Max Pressure springs since they have higher open pressures which can pogo stick a 5/16" push rod once you get into those higher spring rates especially with a heavier valve-train.

I'm very anxious to see what the Fast 102/92 does, but I want to clear up this valve control problem soon after as I bet there is another 5-10rwhp hiding in the valve-train itself.

Last edited by Sales@Tick; 09-17-2012 at 07:42 PM.
Old 09-17-2012, 07:41 PM
  #4  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I just spoke with the customer and he does indeed have the TFS springs with nearly 420lbs of open pressure.

He had two different sets of springs and the other were a set of Lunati's that only had 375-380lbs of open pressure which I had confused with what he actually used.

I'm really thinking now that it's push rod deflection causing this with the heavier open spring pressures being used.
Old 09-17-2012, 08:06 PM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I was running 5/16 push rods with 480ish lbs at .646 lift with my AFR head set up. Cam was 245@.050 and .646 on the intake. Held clean to a peak hp at 6,800. No saying it was the best solution, but never had a problem with it.

I am however having issues with the new heads/cam and PRC's .650 springs. Cam is less aggressive being .629 lift and 254@.050. After pulling a few springs they are 145 on the seat and only 409@.650. I think in my case they are bouncing off the seat. Same push rods, same lifters, .050 preload on the intakes and .060 preload on the exhaust.
Old 09-17-2012, 08:28 PM
  #6  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIL SS
I was running 5/16 push rods with 480ish lbs at .646 lift with my AFR head set up. Cam was 245@.050 and .646 on the intake. Held clean to a peak hp at 6,800. No saying it was the best solution, but never had a problem with it.

I am however having issues with the new heads/cam and PRC's .650 springs. Cam is less aggressive being .629 lift and 254@.050. After pulling a few springs they are 145 on the seat and only 409@.650. I think in my case they are bouncing off the seat. Same push rods, same lifters, .050 preload on the intakes and .060 preload on the exhaust.
That is the same preload I suggested on this customers car. Do you happen to know the weight of the valves you used in the AFR heads? Did you use aftermarket roller rockers?

Even though the lift may be less on your current cam the lobes may be more aggressive than your old camshaft. The only way to really determine if they are less aggressive is by comparing total duration, @.050, @.200, tappet lift, minor intensity and major intensity to name a few.

I also just noticed that the new cam gives up nothing to the stock cam from the time the pull is started to the time it was shut down.
Old 09-17-2012, 10:51 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would have to post all the info on both cams, but trust me, the ramps on this new one are softer

I bought the AFR's back in 2005 or 2006 new. Tony set them up with the light weight intake valves, but I don't rember exactly what those weighed, I think the 2.08 valve were around 105g . I did double check the spring pressure, install height etc.

The vavles in the PRC heads are right around the 110g mark.

Stock rockers with upgraded trunions in both.


Hope that helps.
Old 09-18-2012, 12:48 AM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
bwolfZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I would really like to know why it is falling off at 6300rpm. I'm not sure on the exact spring pressure but I know they were well over 400. I will call the machine ship in the morning and find out if they know still. I have the rockers set at 1 turn past 0 lash which puts the preload at .060". I do bet that if I cant get the stability problem under control it should pick up 5-10whp easy. As I said that we moved the install height up would that have any effect on the open pressure of the spring? The TFS retainers were replaced with Crane 144944-16 retainers
Old 09-18-2012, 07:39 AM
  #9  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LIL SS
I would have to post all the info on both cams, but trust me, the ramps on this new one are softer

I bought the AFR's back in 2005 or 2006 new. Tony set them up with the light weight intake valves, but I don't rember exactly what those weighed, I think the 2.08 valve were around 105g . I did double check the spring pressure, install height etc.

The vavles in the PRC heads are right around the 110g mark.

Stock rockers with upgraded trunions in both.


Hope that helps.
Yes it does thank you for the shared information. That's a lot lighter than the TFS valves that come with these heads. I would say that is the only downfall if you could even call it a downfall of a TFS head set-up is the heavier valve weight and the weight of the roller rockers.
Originally Posted by bwolfZ28
I would really like to know why it is falling off at 6300rpm. I'm not sure on the exact spring pressure but I know they were well over 400. I will call the machine ship in the morning and find out if they know still. I have the rockers set at 1 turn past 0 lash which puts the preload at .060". I do bet that if I cant get the stability problem under control it should pick up 5-10whp easy. As I said that we moved the install height up would that have any effect on the open pressure of the spring? The TFS retainers were replaced with Crane 144944-16 retainers
We will get it figured out Brian. I'm confident that with this slight issue resolved that you would of squeaked out 445-450rwhp like we intended.

Anxious as you are probably to see what the Fast intake does.
Old 09-18-2012, 08:05 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
20ws601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Murderland
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had the ls3 hollow stems cut down, no complaints here 469 on a mustang with a fast 92.
Old 09-18-2012, 10:51 AM
  #11  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
bwolfZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Just dropped the car off at the tuner. I should have a new graph up by the end of the day.
Old 09-18-2012, 11:35 AM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
06X6spdGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe i missed it,

But is this combo using the stock GM rockers or aftermarket rollers??

Pretty damn impressive that it didnt give up anything compaired to stock cam... would be interesting to see what the fast produces....

This combo still on stock gears and 10bolt?
Old 09-18-2012, 01:16 PM
  #13  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
bwolfZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm using Comp Pro magnum 1.75RR and yes its a 10bolt with 3.42's (for the next month or so).
Old 09-18-2012, 01:33 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
bwolfZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Martin: Would preload around .090" resolve the issue or do you think that is irrelevant?
Old 09-18-2012, 02:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Killer5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ms
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What exhaust lobe is that HUC?
Old 09-18-2012, 03:41 PM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If I am having problem with mine currently, 145lbs on the seat and 409lb @ .650 (only lifting to .629 and did not check there), lighter valves, stock rockers, I'd say that your pressures are not enough. And I am leaning towards it being more of a seat pressure like what I am seeing.

I have had Tony Mamo explain that he sees more problems with too little seat pressure before too little open pressure. Basically the valve bounces off the seat before it gets lofted off the lobe. David Vizard also talks about this in his valve train book.

Looking at mine, shimming them .015 was gonna gain me less than 15lbs of seat pressure. That is why I am buying different springs and shimming those up. I should have 180ish on the seat and 470ish open.

My springs are not that old. Couple hundred miles, 10ish dyno pulls and 15ish passes at the track. They are down 60lbs at .650..
Old 09-18-2012, 03:59 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
06X6spdGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lil Ss,
Are you running TFS heads or afr??

Thought i had read somewhere to be below 410 lbs @ .650 with stock rockers.... but could be wrong or have misread it..

Im running 386# at .625 with my TFS 220 Ls1 heads on the Lq9
Old 09-18-2012, 04:07 PM
  #18  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Neither, I have a set of PRC's on the motor now. I think spring pressure is relative to the complete combo. Rockers are only one piece of the puzzle. Valve weight, lifter weight, push rod weight, spring weight, retainer weight, weight of the locks, rocker ratio, rpm.. All of that determines what spring you need. There is more to it than a simple answer of stock rocker, below 410lbs.
Old 09-18-2012, 04:56 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackonblacksls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think tooley has said don't get crazy with spring pressure on stock rockers to save valve tips.
Old 09-18-2012, 06:04 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
06X6spdGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackonblacksls
I think tooley has said don't get crazy with spring pressure on stock rockers to save valve tips.
THIS ^^

Kind of what I was referring to... and the change in head design with valve angles.

But Im sure there is ALOT that goes into a valvetrain more than just rockers...


Quick Reply: As cast TFS 220/Stock LS6/Stock TB/1 x 3/4"/custom cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.