391/366
12-20-2014, 12:09 AM
#1
391/366 2002 Camaro vert
Sbe lq9
Tick performance custom grind
Ls7 lifters and btr 7.375 pushrods
241's cnc ported stage 1 by TEA
Stock ls6 intake
Stock throttle body and MAF
Pacesetter 1 3/4 longtubes
Dual 3" into single 4" with a flowmaster merge and dynomax bullet
Numbers through a stalled 60e and 9" with a spool and 4.11's.
Before the low numbers comments start, this car layed waste to a 450+ hp z06 right after we dynoed. The numbers are deceiving and this was on a MD 5000.
Sbe lq9
Tick performance custom grind
Ls7 lifters and btr 7.375 pushrods
241's cnc ported stage 1 by TEA
Stock ls6 intake
Stock throttle body and MAF
Pacesetter 1 3/4 longtubes
Dual 3" into single 4" with a flowmaster merge and dynomax bullet
Numbers through a stalled 60e and 9" with a spool and 4.11's.
Before the low numbers comments start, this car layed waste to a 450+ hp z06 right after we dynoed. The numbers are deceiving and this was on a MD 5000.
12-20-2014, 01:13 PM
#2
Those sound like solid numbers to me for a mustang dyno that is calibrated and used 100% correctly. It's very realistic for a mustang dyno operated properly to read 10-12% lower than a dyno jet.
The fact you still have a ls6 intake and trying to put that power through a 9" with a spool shows that the numbers look about right.
Should run low 11's and if you work at it high 10's.
The fact you still have a ls6 intake and trying to put that power through a 9" with a spool shows that the numbers look about right.
Should run low 11's and if you work at it high 10's.
Last edited by Sales@Tick; 12-22-2014 at 09:46 AM.
Trending Topics
12-28-2014, 07:22 PM
#11
Those sound like solid numbers to me for a mustang dyno that is calibrated and used 100% correctly. It's very realistic for a mustang dyno operated properly to read 10-12% lower than a dyno jet.
The fact you still have a ls6 intake and trying to put that power through a 9" with a spool shows that the numbers look about right.
Should run low 11's and if you work at it high 10's.
The fact you still have a ls6 intake and trying to put that power through a 9" with a spool shows that the numbers look about right.
Should run low 11's and if you work at it high 10's.
Last edited by HISS; 12-28-2014 at 08:02 PM.
12-28-2014, 07:52 PM
#12
One thing to note and I see this happen a lot.
Guys go to the track and don't run what they expected. Try to data log any and every pass you make.
You'd be amazed some of the things that can be going on and you never really realize it.
There is no reason even with the power it made you should be going low 12's. I wouldn't start throwing parts at it yet. If I was going to buy an intake it would be a fast 92 instead.
Guys go to the track and don't run what they expected. Try to data log any and every pass you make.
You'd be amazed some of the things that can be going on and you never really realize it.
There is no reason even with the power it made you should be going low 12's. I wouldn't start throwing parts at it yet. If I was going to buy an intake it would be a fast 92 instead.
12-28-2014, 08:00 PM
#13
One thing to note and I see this happen a lot.
Guys go to the track and don't run what they expected. Try to data log any and every pass you make.
You'd be amazed some of the things that can be going on and you never really realize it.
There is no reason even with the power it made you should be going low 12's. I wouldn't start throwing parts at it yet. If I was going to buy an intake it would be a fast 92 instead.
Guys go to the track and don't run what they expected. Try to data log any and every pass you make.
You'd be amazed some of the things that can be going on and you never really realize it.
There is no reason even with the power it made you should be going low 12's. I wouldn't start throwing parts at it yet. If I was going to buy an intake it would be a fast 92 instead.
60' was mid 1.8x so that tells me the converter is way tight, and the car is heavy full weight full option z28 vert with a cage. The mph seems pretty low regardless.
Last edited by HISS; 12-28-2014 at 08:50 PM.
12-29-2014, 09:38 AM
#14
Data logged, everything looked fine. Did you see anything weird with the graph Martin? I sold my intake already so a fast is coming regardless.
60' was mid 1.8x so that tells me the converter is way tight, and the car is heavy full weight full option z28 vert with a cage. The mph seems pretty low regardless.
60' was mid 1.8x so that tells me the converter is way tight, and the car is heavy full weight full option z28 vert with a cage. The mph seems pretty low regardless.
Shift RPM? Good to see you logging the passes though. I have seen a lot of simple things fixed just by doing such.
12-29-2014, 10:05 AM
#15
Shift RPM was 6450-6500. I didn't pay attention to the rpm drop. What I was more concerned with was the 2100 rpm foot brake before it pushed through the beams. I'll tag you in the videos so you can watch the launch etc see if you notice anything weird.
12-29-2014, 10:22 AM
#17
Time slips
Track got damp and wheel hopped on this one
60' 1.986
330' 5.2005
660' 8.0371
660' mph 88.88
1000' 10.42
1320' 12.4442
Mph 112.0
Track surface was good
60' 1.8499
330' 5.1546
660' 7.9312
660' mph 87.77
1000' 10.3441
1320' 12.3762
Mph 111.39
60' 1.8528
330' 5.1831
660' 7.9636
660'mph 88.08
1000' 10.3752
1320' 12.4107
Mph 111.00
60' 1.8356
330' 5.1704
660' 7.9444
660' mph 88.37
1000' 10.3496
1320' 12.3783
Mph 111.33
60' 1.8632
330' 5.1812
660' 7.9494
660' mph 88.44
1000' 10.3523
1320' 12.3805
Mph 111.39
Afr was between 12.5-12.7 on the entire run, and when I was consistant the car was consistant.
Track got damp and wheel hopped on this one
60' 1.986
330' 5.2005
660' 8.0371
660' mph 88.88
1000' 10.42
1320' 12.4442
Mph 112.0
Track surface was good
60' 1.8499
330' 5.1546
660' 7.9312
660' mph 87.77
1000' 10.3441
1320' 12.3762
Mph 111.39
60' 1.8528
330' 5.1831
660' 7.9636
660'mph 88.08
1000' 10.3752
1320' 12.4107
Mph 111.00
60' 1.8356
330' 5.1704
660' 7.9444
660' mph 88.37
1000' 10.3496
1320' 12.3783
Mph 111.33
60' 1.8632
330' 5.1812
660' 7.9494
660' mph 88.44
1000' 10.3523
1320' 12.3805
Mph 111.39
Afr was between 12.5-12.7 on the entire run, and when I was consistant the car was consistant.
12-29-2014, 11:14 AM
#18
Do you know the actual weight of the car and the DA at the track? I would be very bummed with those traps. Especially in the 1/8th...
Even right now when my car has something pretty seriously wrong with it, it was trapping 91mph in the 1/8th and 112mph in the 1/4. Back when it was running good it was running 95mph 1/8 and 116mph 1/4.
Even right now when my car has something pretty seriously wrong with it, it was trapping 91mph in the 1/8th and 112mph in the 1/4. Back when it was running good it was running 95mph 1/8 and 116mph 1/4.