Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Highest NA RWHP?

Old 06-25-2004, 01:43 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Highest NA RWHP?

Where do you folks keep up with these highest numbers? Who has the highest HP all motor?
Old 06-25-2004, 02:12 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
 
TexMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winnsboro, TX
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdioSS
Where do you folks keep up with these highest numbers? Who has the highest HP all motor?
There was a similar question in the internals section, only it was cam-only. I don't know about the highest hp, but the fastest car thats n/a according to Best of tech, hot ls1 engine tech magazine is a ws6 owned by Mike Klemen that runs a 9.65 at 139.21 mph. It has 538 rwhp.
Old 06-25-2004, 03:08 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Talking

Originally Posted by TexMax
There was a similar question in the internals section, only it was cam-only. I don't know about the highest hp, but the fastest car thats n/a according to Best of tech, hot ls1 engine tech magazine is a ws6 owned by Mike Klemen that runs a 9.65 at 139.21 mph. It has 538 rwhp.
so a car that put down 25% more to the wheels should be the fastest when it finally hits the track, right?
Old 06-25-2004, 03:15 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iv_z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdioSS
so a car that put down 25% more to the wheels should be the fastest when it finally hits the track, right?
Theoretically, if it's got the same weight, proper suspension, transmission and driver - yes.
Old 06-25-2004, 05:15 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Iv_z28
Theoretically, if it's got the same weight, proper suspension, transmission and driver - yes.
ok, then what did Mike Kleman's car weigh? The car I'm talking about is a bit heavy for a "race car" but the suspension works very well.
Old 06-25-2004, 05:55 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iv_z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdioSS
ok, then what did Mike Kleman's car weigh? The car I'm talking about is a bit heavy for a "race car" but the suspension works very well.
I don't know. However I suggest you go to the drag racing section of that forum and check out ET database for the info you need (I think they even made it a sticky).
Old 06-25-2004, 05:59 AM
  #7  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've been to that forum. The car hasn't gone down the track in it's current form yet. If the rain down here quits today, then it'll probably make a few passes. Otherwise, it'll be a few more weeks.
Old 06-25-2004, 09:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
B18B1LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lawrenceville, Ga
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I think Vince's car just went 563 rwhp with a Futral 408.

Jeffrey
Old 06-25-2004, 09:57 PM
  #9  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The highest horsepower reported NA is Gordon's 418ci SR setup from Futral Motorsports when it had a M6. The next highest is a 434ci SR street application from Futral Motorsports. Both of the cars mentioned were F-bodies. The highest dyno'ing NA C5 is currently owned by Brent and his car was built by Cartek. I currently own the highest dyno'ing hydraulic cammed F-body and my car was built by Futral Motorsports. I think my record is going to come down soon. Futral Motorsports has customers already calling them to build them a similar setup like mine. Remember dyno #'s are great and they are used as a tool to show the potential of a car. They do not necessarily mean the car will run the times w/out a supporting platform.
Old 06-25-2004, 11:06 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So what were the numbers for those Futral and Cartek cars?
Old 06-25-2004, 11:12 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
 
Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KingCrapBox
So what were the numbers for those Futral and Cartek cars?
Futral....

Gordon's FMS 418 - 612rwhp (6-speed, LS6 intake)
581rwhp (T400 FAST 90 intake)

Ray's FMS street 434 - 605rwhp (6-speed, FAST 90 intake)

Both through 12 bolt, gears and steel flywheels.
Old 06-25-2004, 11:44 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

All of that on 93 Octane? Do you have the dyno-graphs for those cars? Thanks a bunch Candy!
Old 06-25-2004, 11:49 PM
  #13  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingCrapBox
All of that on 93 Octane? Do you have the dyno-graphs for those cars? Thanks a bunch Candy!
Well Gordons car is strickly race. So I am sure it dyno'd on 103 octane. The 434ci most likely dyno'd like I did on a 103/93 mix.
Old 06-25-2004, 11:52 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How about cars that have dynoed on straight 93 Octane, just the way a Mustang driver would run across it on the street.
Old 06-25-2004, 11:53 PM
  #15  
FormerVendor
 
Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gordon's was on straight C16 and the 434 was 103\93 mix.
Old 06-25-2004, 11:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Awesome! Thanks a bunch Candy! Those are great numbers!
Old 06-26-2004, 09:16 AM
  #17  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingCrapBox
How about cars that have dynoed on straight 93 Octane, just the way a Mustang driver would run across it on the street.
To actually do this test you would have to get ALL the CLAIMED high horsepower cars in one location. Same dyno, same time of day, and pump gas put in by independent person. If this is not done then anyone can claim anything.

Most people who race ask for a more aggressive setup. Usually that means more compression. Therefore not being pump gas friendly. Also depending on where you live will cause your compression to be lower or you to run less timing on HOT DAYS. Well I live in Florida and Futral Motorsports made it a point to keep my compression safe even though I told them I can reduce timing with the timing tuner. I even suggested running a bigger cam to bleed off compression, but Futral Motorsports told me to stick with the original plan. Which was building a potent, idle perfect, street car. Well that is what was delivered to me on June 22nd. Am I picky? Yes, I drove around with my scan tool and verified my timing was 28 degree's at WOT. No KR on pump gas in Louisiana. How do I know? I filled the car up. I drove the car all the way back to Florida using 93 octane and I saw no KR. On day two of having the car home it was especially HOT. To be exact it was 97 degrees out at 1pm. I took a friend for a ride and we both could hear knocking when I hit 5krpm on a quick blast. I pulled out my scan tool to verify. I saw 3 degrees retard. I got out of the car and used my nifty timing tuner and reduced timing to a MAX of 6 degrees. I forgot to mention I had already reduced timing that morning because I knew it was going to be hot. Anyway, I took my car for another blast and no KR. It drove perfect on 22 degree's of timing on a VERY HOT Summer day. My compression is 11.7:1. My cam is not much bigger than the Trex that is going in 346's. Allan Futral wanted to keep the low rpm tq high to maintain driveability and reduce bucking below 2krpm. I have 3.73's and I think my old 4.10 combo would have been perfect for this setup NA, but on the spray on the street, 3.73's are better.

Basically what I am trying to say is depending on the combo, location where customer lives, finances available to customer and integrity of the engine builder/tuner will determine what is pump gas friendly.
Old 06-26-2004, 12:43 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Wink

Originally Posted by Candy
Futral....

Gordon's FMS 418 - 612rwhp (6-speed, LS6 intake)
581rwhp (T400 FAST 90 intake)

Ray's FMS street 434 - 605rwhp (6-speed, FAST 90 intake)

Both through 12 bolt, gears and steel flywheels.

So that's the highest NA RWHP LS1 known? I guess in a few weeks the car I've been talking about will hit the track and then maybe they'll let the truth be known.

It should be obvious on which one I'm talking about.
Old 06-26-2004, 03:56 PM
  #19  
FormerVendor
 
Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdioSS
So that's the highest NA RWHP LS1 known? I guess in a few weeks the car I've been talking about will hit the track and then maybe they'll let the truth be known.

It should be obvious on which one I'm talking about.

Those are just a couple of authorized disclosures, not everyone spills the news of their setup online

I have no clue who you are talking about unless however the car is yours hmmm
Old 06-26-2004, 04:01 PM
  #20  
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
XLR8NSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Posts: 21,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know of one higher than 612rwhp NA but, I ain't talking.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Highest NA RWHP?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.