Replaced FM13 with FM15 (Ron Jeremy), lost power
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Replaced FM13 with FM15 (Ron Jeremy), lost power
I'm at a loss here. Through my old restrictive exhaust, no cutouts, I made 393rwhp/375rwtq with the FM13. With the FM15, QTP ory, cutouts open, tuned, it made 386/365. Cutouts closed, it made 375/353. These numbers are nowhere near what I was expecting or where they should be. The car feels sluggish as well... doesn't pull as hard as it used to top end.
I have full boltons (LS6 intake, LT's, pulley, TB, etc.) The only changes to the car are the new cam, a TSP oil pump, and a Rollmaster single roller timing set. The timing set is non-adjustable. We installed the cam dot to dot. It'd be fantastic if it was off a tooth, but with the size of the FM15, I don't see that being the problem, I'd think there would be major P to V clearance issues. It peaks at 6300rpm.
Tomorrow, Gomer and I are going to redyno the car at Racetech and then tear it down, maybe something is wrong but it sure doesn't seem that way. More to come soon. Any thoughts / comments / suggestions / questions are welcome.
Oh yeah, Happy Thanksgiving too.
I have full boltons (LS6 intake, LT's, pulley, TB, etc.) The only changes to the car are the new cam, a TSP oil pump, and a Rollmaster single roller timing set. The timing set is non-adjustable. We installed the cam dot to dot. It'd be fantastic if it was off a tooth, but with the size of the FM15, I don't see that being the problem, I'd think there would be major P to V clearance issues. It peaks at 6300rpm.
Tomorrow, Gomer and I are going to redyno the car at Racetech and then tear it down, maybe something is wrong but it sure doesn't seem that way. More to come soon. Any thoughts / comments / suggestions / questions are welcome.
Oh yeah, Happy Thanksgiving too.
#2
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you log it when you dynoed? Howd that look? Did you tune at all?
Friend of mine installed a cam once and his car ran OK but was down on power though.. turns out he installed the cam one tooth off. They fixed it and he showed almost 30 more hp then before. But yeah, with the FM15 Im not sure how much the tolerances would allow a tooth being off.
Good luck.
Friend of mine installed a cam once and his car ran OK but was down on power though.. turns out he installed the cam one tooth off. They fixed it and he showed almost 30 more hp then before. But yeah, with the FM15 Im not sure how much the tolerances would allow a tooth being off.
Good luck.
#6
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CANNIBAL
Was it even tuned after the install?
What was the A/F on the dyno?
There's too many variables not accounted for here.
What was the A/F on the dyno?
There's too many variables not accounted for here.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by jlaw
What is unaccounted for? I stated in my first post that it was tuned... Mike Norris at NLP tuned the car yesterday, he was the same one who tuned the car with the FM13. AFR was dead on, total timing was 28-29* between 3200 and 6800rpm (we threw 33-34* at it and gained no power) and there was 0 KR.
And it is peaking at it's proposed peak, correct?
There other info I was referring to you made known with the quoted reply that wasn't in your original post.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CANNIBAL
I just saw the "tuned" buried in your text. Thanks for the clarification.
And it is peaking at it's proposed peak, correct?
There other info I was referring to you made known with the quoted reply that wasn't in your original post.
And it is peaking at it's proposed peak, correct?
There other info I was referring to you made known with the quoted reply that wasn't in your original post.
#10
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
i dont know what to tell you jon, the cam is in right.
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
hopefully youll figure something out if you tear it down this weekend
#13
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by jlaw
111 LSA, 108 ICL
I have dyno sheets of this cam, all showing a ~6300rpm peak... one from Allan, one from Gomer, one from SidewaysOZ...
I have dyno sheets of this cam, all showing a ~6300rpm peak... one from Allan, one from Gomer, one from SidewaysOZ...
#15
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kurtomac
my F13 was ground as follows 230 232 595 585 113+2 heres a pic of my graph
#16
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well where did your smaller F13 peak in comparison to your F15 which is bigger and SHOULD or i would think peak higher? btw good luck with your **** box ***, you dont have to be a dick i was just tryin to show where a 113+2 cam would peak in comparison to others
#20
Jon,you and Gomer take a look at it yet?
I will be in Tallahassee Saturday around 2:00-3:00,meeting with a customer to drop off car . We can make arrangements to meet up and I can do some looking into if you want.
I will be in Tallahassee Saturday around 2:00-3:00,meeting with a customer to drop off car . We can make arrangements to meet up and I can do some looking into if you want.