Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2005, 10:11 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376




Possible? Any idea what my inj. pulse rate should be? It was at mid 22-23... I think I was really really rich...

times are not a fluke think i have ran very close more than several times...

Just trying to figure out if this is just possible or was there something wrong w/ my tune.
Old 02-07-2005, 10:11 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2002 A4 Z28

Magnaflow Exhaust/K&N filter/Free Mods/LS6 Block/NGK TR55 Plugs/3.42 Gears/Clear MTI Lid/Porter TB/Aluminum D.S/Smooth Bellow/ M/T ET Streets/ Flowtechs Headers/ FLowtech ORY/HP Tuners/160* Hyperstat/Lower control arms/relocation brackets/TnT Nitrous
Ram Air II Hood/C5 Rims/Nitto 555E Tires


1/4- 12.50 @ 114...60'-1.97 (street tires)........ TnT 11.5@ 125.5 60'-1.89 (m/t)
1/8- 8.05@ 92.5 (street tires)........................ TnT 7.52@ 97.9 same run
Old 02-08-2005, 04:42 AM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
LS1SS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

great time, with cam and ratio u will get better
Old 02-08-2005, 01:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
 
Turo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont know man, i say dyno again. those dyno numbers just seem WAY too low for the times you're running, unless your car is really really light.
Old 02-08-2005, 02:01 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

3650-70 depending on gas. thats a pretty empty tank there.
Old 02-08-2005, 07:03 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
turbogarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 'tosa, wisconsin
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
Old 02-08-2005, 07:17 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbogarrett
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
thank you...lol

everyone wants to say oh its ok just a low dyno and runs good. from physics this ddoesnt add up..I have someone looking over the logs now. I think I was going so rich it killed the hp...

I think its a dyno jet btw

I know one guy dynoed 344 and ran .2 thenths slower like 4 hours later at the track. Trap was 2mph slower as well. He had slightly better 60's than I did.

Nitrous he put down like 440 to my 376 and I run the same time w/ a 95 trap to his 90.... I only sprayed from 50 up to his spraying out of the whole...
Old 02-08-2005, 08:32 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
RUSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbogarrett
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me
Old 02-20-2005, 11:09 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
 
CarsRFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nice torque....
Old 02-20-2005, 11:28 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
hc_performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: memphis
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RUSH
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me
Nope its a dynojet. This dyno has been known to read sometimes 20-30 rwhp less than others in the same conditions.
Old 02-20-2005, 11:36 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
DocEwww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

damn and I thought my 12.464 @ 111.85 with 330rwhp was impressive...does sound like ur numbers are way lower than they should be with a 114 trap.
Old 02-21-2005, 01:18 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
thenewb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's
Old 02-21-2005, 08:25 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thenewb
340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's
My thoughts exackly People laughed when i said one of the 1st mods should be et streets.... But then i beat cammed cars all the time. So hmmm

However trap shows a lot... I think it was the tune.... I found out in the tuning section when i scaled the maf it creates a mess...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.