Guess my dyno numbers.
02-10-2005, 03:53 PM
#1
Guess my dyno numbers. I'm going to get my car tuned on the 15th ( My birthday ), and I was wondering what everyone thought my car should dyno, so that I get a better idea and don't get disappointed.
Mods are in sig, and the car trapped at 106 and 107 consistently off of 2.1 or 2.2 60 foot times. Oh, and track times were set previous to the headers, true duals, and gears. Exhaust at the time was a Magnaflow Catback. Gears were stock 3.23's
The Dyno is a Dynojet 248.
All guesses would be appreciated, and numbers will be posted on Tuesday so we can see how close everybody was.
Mods are in sig, and the car trapped at 106 and 107 consistently off of 2.1 or 2.2 60 foot times. Oh, and track times were set previous to the headers, true duals, and gears. Exhaust at the time was a Magnaflow Catback. Gears were stock 3.23's
The Dyno is a Dynojet 248.
All guesses would be appreciated, and numbers will be posted on Tuesday so we can see how close everybody was.
02-15-2005, 06:50 PM
#5
Y'all were off a little bit. Got a best SAE HP of 324.7, and a best SAE TQ of 339.6 ( on separate pulls ). The tune gave me a good amount more under the curve, and I'm really impressed with the torque curve. I don't see why everyone says that headers and true duals robs you of down-low torque, 'cause I just dont see it.
gomer did a really good job for me, and as a result, the car is a lot more driveable. MUCH better shift points with this tune than with the HPP3. I know that some would consider these numbers low, but I'm satisfied with them, 'cause after all, you can't race a dyno. I'm sure that I'll see good results at the track.
gomer should be posting up a graph for me in this thread soon, so you can tell me how everything looks.
gomer did a really good job for me, and as a result, the car is a lot more driveable. MUCH better shift points with this tune than with the HPP3. I know that some would consider these numbers low, but I'm satisfied with them, 'cause after all, you can't race a dyno. I'm sure that I'll see good results at the track.
gomer should be posting up a graph for me in this thread soon, so you can tell me how everything looks.
i got 321hp and 335tq no tune though.
02-16-2005, 08:07 AM
#7
Well, I've got those gears eating some HP up. Go get you a tune man, the drivability of the car improves a whole lot. My car was running pretty rich at first, like 11.8 and 11.9 AFR. Now I've got a nice flat AFR curve, sittin' at 12.8.
Trending Topics
02-17-2005, 03:00 PM
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the graph! The only changes between these two runs was leaning it out some. We ran the baseline with timing already added.
Last edited by gomer; 02-17-2005 at 03:19 PM.
02-17-2005, 04:49 PM
#12
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jet_black
Scott, why do your graphs list my torque as lower? The chart Walker gave me said 337 on the 2nd run and 339.6 on the final. Did they just not correct it?
