Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

mustang vs dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2005, 10:43 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
seppe855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: california
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default mustang vs dynojet

what are the differences between mustang and dynojet and which one is better
Old 03-24-2005, 04:33 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
97bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My understanding is the mustang dyno is a brake dyno that applies a larger load on the rollers to simulate wind resistance as speed increases and emulates "real world" load on the car. A dynojet doesn't simulate wind resistance and will give higher readings than a mustang dyno. Either dyno is a good tuning tool although I think the general consensus is the mustang dyno is a little better for tuning due to the higher load applied. Either a dynojet or mustang will work well for tuning and measuring gains as long as you consistently use the same type of dyno.

Last edited by 97bowtie; 03-24-2005 at 04:43 PM.
Old 03-24-2005, 04:43 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TroubledWine3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard the exact opposite. I heard the Mustang reads higher and the Dynojet is the more accurate and desired of the two.
Old 03-24-2005, 04:44 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
97bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TroubledWine3
I heard the exact opposite. I heard the Mustang reads higher and the Dynojet is the more accurate and desired of the two.
Mustang dynos will give lower results than a dynojet as they attempt to emulate real world driving conditions under load. Dynojets have no active power absortion device as a brake dyno does. The dynojet uses solely the weight of the drum as its load on the rear tires.
Old 03-24-2005, 04:55 PM
  #5  
Launching!
 
PHANTA-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Mustang is definitly lower (usually ~5-8%), and it has a electric eddy-current brake that allows you to put a specified amount of load on a vehicle, which is very nice for tuning purposes. The Dynojet will give you bigger numbers though.
Old 03-25-2005, 04:12 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
prostock_bigblock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC, Charlotte / SC, RockHill
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I heard the exact opposite. I heard the Mustang reads higher and the Dynojet is the more accurate and desired of the two.
me to . Ive read the opposite .
Old 03-25-2005, 07:53 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dynocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When the Dynojet and Mustang are calibrated to the manufacturer's specs, the Dynojet reads 10-20% higher then the Mustang, a non linear % depending upon HP range and drivetrain mods. However, many businesses either don't do it, don't know how or intentionally skew their readings to increase business which is why we have the above confusion. Example, I've asked many dyno operators if they are compensating for elevation and they don't know.
Old 03-25-2005, 08:34 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
v8maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Commerce, MI
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

mustang will dyno LOWER than a dynojet.
Old 03-25-2005, 09:26 AM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
97bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by prostock_bigblock
me to . Ive read the opposite .
Just so there is no confusion, mustang dynos will read LOWER than dynojets.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.