New Prc 5.3 -2.5's/torquer Cam!!!
05-06-2005, 06:41 AM
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New Prc 5.3 -2.5's/torquer Cam!!! we just got the car put togther, and needless to say we where impressed!!!
the car is an 01' ws6 m6...
-new tsp prc 5.3 stg 2.5's
-torquer cam .589/.589
-pasesetter LT's/tsp y-pipe/loudmouth
DYNORUN1=MAX POWER-439.3 RWHP/411 RWTQ
not to bad for truck heads and a "small" cam.graph on the way!
BTW-the car has sock block w/80k/10-bolt-3.42's.
the car is an 01' ws6 m6...
-new tsp prc 5.3 stg 2.5's
-torquer cam .589/.589
-pasesetter LT's/tsp y-pipe/loudmouth
DYNORUN1=MAX POWER-439.3 RWHP/411 RWTQ
not to bad for truck heads and a "small" cam.graph on the way!
BTW-the car has sock block w/80k/10-bolt-3.42's.
05-06-2005, 07:48 AM
#2
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
we just got the car put togther, and needless to say we where impressed!!!
the car is an 01' ws6 m6...
-new tsp prc 5.3 stg 2.5's
-torquer cam .589/.589
-pasesetter LT's/tsp y-pipe/loudmouth
DYNORUN1=MAX POWER-439.3 RWHP/411 RWTQ
not to bad for truck heads and a "small" cam.graph on the way!
BTW-the car has sock block w/80k/10-bolt-3.42's.
the car is an 01' ws6 m6...
-new tsp prc 5.3 stg 2.5's
-torquer cam .589/.589
-pasesetter LT's/tsp y-pipe/loudmouth
DYNORUN1=MAX POWER-439.3 RWHP/411 RWTQ
not to bad for truck heads and a "small" cam.graph on the way!
BTW-the car has sock block w/80k/10-bolt-3.42's.
Are these numbers SAE? Would you post a dynograph???
Trending Topics
05-06-2005, 01:42 PM
#11
Originally Posted by SuperZ
There are 2 torquers a 225/225 589/589 and a 233/233 595/595 so yes the one they used is a small cam.Get your stuff right before you act like a bad ***.
there are several versions that they call their "torquer" cams on their site...none of them are under 230 in duration. Also if youve ever heard their 225 cam its lopey as hell with no tuning even in an m6 with the 800 rpm idle...its by no means a small cam IMO just no Trex or majic stick
Last edited by foff667; 05-06-2005 at 01:49 PM.
05-06-2005, 01:48 PM
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by foff667
http://www.texas-speed.com/9802fbody...tFld=9802fbody
there are several versions that they call their "torquer" cams on their site...none of them are under 230 in duration.
there are several versions that they call their "torquer" cams on their site...none of them are under 230 in duration.
Yea have a nice day
05-06-2005, 02:10 PM
#14
Great results man! These heads are really going to become popular. The great thing is every set is put together with great attention to detail. This helps to insure everyone gets a great head, instead of making a few good heads for the internet & sending junk to the other customers...
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
05-06-2005, 03:20 PM
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperZ
Wow my mistake"lilbuddy" 
.I still wouldnt consider 589 lift a big cam there are plenty of cams 600 plus lift.
.I still wouldnt consider 589 lift a big cam there are plenty of cams 600 plus lift.
) so again have a nice day 
05-06-2005, 05:30 PM
#16
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it is the 233/233 cam, and not i put "SMALL" cam.....
graph will be up soon, trying to figure this out...
thanks jason, yea these heads are awesome, and the cam pulled pretty good, i believe it made peak hp @6400.ill have the graph up soon.
thanks.
graph will be up soon, trying to figure this out...
thanks jason, yea these heads are awesome, and the cam pulled pretty good, i believe it made peak hp @6400.ill have the graph up soon.
thanks.
05-07-2005, 09:23 AM
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
it is the 233/233 cam, and not i put "SMALL" cam.....
graph will be up soon, trying to figure this out...
thanks jason, yea these heads are awesome, and the cam pulled pretty good, i believe it made peak hp @6400.ill have the graph up soon.
thanks.
graph will be up soon, trying to figure this out...
thanks jason, yea these heads are awesome, and the cam pulled pretty good, i believe it made peak hp @6400.ill have the graph up soon.
thanks.
I have the same cam but no heads. It put down 362hp and 341tq.
06-28-2005, 10:03 AM
#20
The 225 camshaft is not the torquer camshaft. The original Torquer was a 233/233, but it has recently been replaced with a 232/234 XER version called the T2
Great results though!!
Great results though!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com