TSP 233/239 Dyno Results
05-12-2005, 07:31 AM
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TSP 233/239 Dyno Results I got my cam installed last week, and got the dyno tune just the other day. I'm pretty happy with it considering im still on the stock LS1 Intake, stock pulley and stock TB and stock maf. My next round of mods are gonna be an LS6 intake and an underdrive pulley, with the addition of those 2 mods, should put me at around 400-410 on motor. Overall I'm happy with this cam I chose, it makes the car 100x's funner to drive, and I love finally having power up top! its taking some getting use to shifting at 6700, but im lovin it!
.
.
05-12-2005, 11:06 AM
#6
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp
how do you think the thread got here 
, i'll give you a hint, havoc didnt post it here....
, i'll give you a hint, havoc didnt post it here....my bad for posting in the wrong forum, i posted it in the ls1 internal engine because this is all about the new cam, and that basically all that is talked about in ls1 internal engine, so many people ask quesitons there about cam, seemed like the right place to me, exsp, since i bet most of them dont even visit this seciton to find out. oh well!
anyways, the last time I dynoed my car (before the cam) I did 345 rwhp and 360 rwtq. so this cam gave me a gain of 45 rwhp and 13 rwtq! pretty good I think!
Trending Topics
on the 360rwtq on the previous dyno; especially not without an ls6 intake, TB, and pulley.
05-12-2005, 11:47 AM
#9
I rolled 352 tq with nearly the same bolt-ons as this guy, less the x-pipe and true duals. I can definitely see the x-pipe and true duals making 360 tq. Just MO.
I'm curious to see the SAE numbers as well. That torque curve looks pretty good for the 233/239. You need to spin the motor higher than 6400 w/that cam. You probably would have made another 2-4 peak rwhp had you spun it to ~ 6700.
I'm curious to see the SAE numbers as well. That torque curve looks pretty good for the 233/239. You need to spin the motor higher than 6400 w/that cam. You probably would have made another 2-4 peak rwhp had you spun it to ~ 6700.
05-12-2005, 12:21 PM
#11
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by verbs
Can you post the corrected dynojet numbers?
97bowtie, on the motor run, we acutally did take it upto 6700, for some reason they dyno just stopped reading after 6400...
jrp Quote:
im gonna call on the 360rwtq on the previous dyno; especially not without an ls6 intake, TB, and pulley.
im gonna call on the 360rwtq on the previous dyno; especially not without an ls6 intake, TB, and pulley.
I didn't print out my last dyno sheet where I made 360rwtq, However, I do have this one from over a year ago where I made 358.8 rwtq, with only mods being Lid, LT headers, cutom true duals with an X pipe.
.
Last edited by _HAVOC_; 05-12-2005 at 12:34 PM.
05-12-2005, 01:44 PM
#16
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't take this as a slam... its just I'm not very impressed with the torque curves this cam is producing.
I'm glad you are happy with it tho. Just making an observation of the past few dynos I have looked at. Of course, I may be looking at the wrong dynos.
I think it's very misleading to have nicknamed this camshaft "The Torquer".
I'm glad you are happy with it tho. Just making an observation of the past few dynos I have looked at. Of course, I may be looking at the wrong dynos.
I think it's very misleading to have nicknamed this camshaft "The Torquer".
05-12-2005, 01:59 PM
#18
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First off, this is NOT our Torquer cam, it's the 233/239. Secondly, he DOES NOT HAVE ALL THE BOLT_ONS! 
Good numbers Havoc
You'll have fun with that cam.
Brian
Good numbers Havoc
You'll have fun with that cam.Brian
__________________
01 NBM Z28- A4 w/3.23s, TSP Black Lid, Hooker Catback, Pacesetter Headers w/ORY, ASP Pulley, Ported Throttle Body, TSP Torq. v3(231/234) Camshaft, TCI 4400, PRC Stg 1 Heads
Texas Speed & Performance
www.texas-speed.com
(806) 866-0734
01 NBM Z28- A4 w/3.23s, TSP Black Lid, Hooker Catback, Pacesetter Headers w/ORY, ASP Pulley, Ported Throttle Body, TSP Torq. v3(231/234) Camshaft, TCI 4400, PRC Stg 1 Heads
Texas Speed & Performance
www.texas-speed.com
(806) 866-0734
Last edited by Brian @ Texas Speed & Performance; 05-12-2005 at 02:17 PM.
05-12-2005, 02:20 PM
#19
The Torquer Camshaft "T2" Camshaft is a 232/234 XER Comp Grind.
Is this camshaft the version 2 of the 233/239 or version 1? Either way I think the graph looks fine & it should do very well when you add pulley, tb, & a ls6 intake
Is this camshaft the version 2 of the 233/239 or version 1? Either way I think the graph looks fine & it should do very well when you add pulley, tb, & a ls6 intake
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
05-12-2005, 08:35 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
The Torquer Camshaft "T2" Camshaft is a 232/234 XER Comp Grind.
Is this camshaft the version 2 of the 233/239 or version 1? Either way I think the graph looks fine & it should do very well when you add pulley, tb, & a ls6 intake
Is this camshaft the version 2 of the 233/239 or version 1? Either way I think the graph looks fine & it should do very well when you add pulley, tb, & a ls6 intake
damn,
now i need to go and spray my 233/239
so i can make that crazy *** power
